Privileged Functional Connectivity between the Visual Word Form Area and the Language System

The visual word form area (VWFA) is a region in the left occipitotemporal sulcus of literate individuals that is purportedly specialized for visual word recognition. However, there is considerable controversy about its functional specificity and connectivity, with some arguing that it serves as a domain-general, rather than word-specific, visual processor. The VWFA is a critical region for testing hypotheses about the nature of cortical organization, because it is known to develop only through experience (i.e., reading acquisition), and widespread literacy is too recent to have influenced genetic determinants of brain organization. Using a combination of advanced fMRI analysis techniques, including individual functional localization, multivoxel pattern analysis, and high-resolution resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) analyses, with data from 33 healthy adult human participants, we demonstrate that (1) the VWFA can discriminate words from nonword letter strings (pseudowords); (2) the VWFA has preferential RSFC with Wernicke's area and other core regions of the language system; and (3) the strength of the RSFC between the VWFA and Wernicke's area predicts performance on a semantic classification task with words but not other categories of visual stimuli. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that the VWFA is specialized for lexical processing of real words because of its functional connectivity with Wernicke's area. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The visual word form area (VWFA) is critical for determining the nature of category-related organization of the ventral visual system. However, its functional specificity and connectivity are fiercely debated. Recent work concluded that the VWFA is a domain-general, rather than word-specific, visual processor with no preferential functional connectivity with the language system. Using more advanced techniques, our results stand in stark contrast to these earlier findings. We demonstrate that the VWFA is highly specialized for lexical processing of real words, and that a fundamental factor driving this specialization is its preferential intrinsic functional connectivity with core regions of the language system. Our results support the hypothesis that intrinsic functional connectivity contributes to category-related specialization within the human ventral visual system.

[1]  Michelle Hampson,et al.  Connectivity–behavior analysis reveals that functional connectivity between left BA39 and Broca's area varies with reading ability , 2006, NeuroImage.

[2]  D. Schacter,et al.  Implicit memory and priming , 2008 .

[3]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  What do differences between multi-voxel and univariate analysis mean? How subject-, voxel-, and trial-level variance impact fMRI analysis , 2014, NeuroImage.

[4]  D. Schacter,et al.  Reductions in cortical activity during priming , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[5]  Xi-Nian Zuo,et al.  Resting-State Functional Connectivity Indexes Reading Competence in Children and Adults , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Amir Amedi,et al.  Origins of the specialization for letters and numbers in ventral occipitotemporal cortex , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  S. Petersen,et al.  The putative visual word form area is functionally connected to the dorsal attention network. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  A new neural framework for visuospatial processing , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[9]  Lorraine K Tyler,et al.  Morphology, language and the brain: the decompositional substrate for language comprehension , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Connectivity precedes function in the development of the visual word form area , 2016, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  Suzanne E. Welcome,et al.  Preserved mid-fusiform activation for visual words in a patient with a visual word recognition impairment , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Systems Neuroscience , 2022 .

[13]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  The ventral visual pathway: an expanded neural framework for the processing of object quality , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The unique role of the visual word form area in reading , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  Bilateral hemispheric processing of words and faces: evidence from word impairments in prosopagnosia and face impairments in pure alexia. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  Cyril Poupon,et al.  Anatomical Connections of the Visual Word Form Area , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[18]  A. Schleicher,et al.  Broca's region revisited: Cytoarchitecture and intersubject variability , 1999, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[19]  Josef P. Rauschecker,et al.  Wernicke’s area revisited: Parallel streams and word processing , 2013, Brain and Language.

[20]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Cerebral Lateralization of Frontal Lobe Language Processes and Lateralization of the Posterior Visual Word Processing System , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  Chris I. Baker,et al.  Teaching an adult brain new tricks: A critical review of evidence for training-dependent structural plasticity in humans , 2013, NeuroImage.

[23]  Itamar Kahn,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetry of visual scene processing in the human brain: evidence from repetition priming and intrinsic activity. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[24]  D. Plaut,et al.  Distributed circuits, not circumscribed centers, mediate visual recognition , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  S. Petersen,et al.  The left occipitotemporal cortex does not show preferential activity for words. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  What drives the organization of object knowledge in the brain? , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  Hang Joon Jo,et al.  Effective Preprocessing Procedures Virtually Eliminate Distance-Dependent Motion Artifacts in Resting State FMRI , 2013, J. Appl. Math..

[28]  Laurie S. Glezer,et al.  Evidence for Highly Selective Neuronal Tuning to Whole Words in the “Visual Word Form Area” , 2009, Neuron.

[29]  Hang Joon Jo,et al.  Mapping sources of correlation in resting state FMRI, with artifact detection and removal , 2010, NeuroImage.

[30]  R. Matthew Hutchison,et al.  Resting-state fMRI reveals functional connectivity between face-selective perirhinal cortex and the fusiform face area related to face inversion , 2014, NeuroImage.

[31]  Zeynep M. Saygin,et al.  Anatomical connectivity patterns predict face-selectivity in the fusiform gyrus , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  R Nathan Spreng,et al.  Resting-state functional connectivity MRI reveals active processes central to cognition. , 2014, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[33]  Joseph T Devlin,et al.  The myth of the visual word form area , 2003, NeuroImage.

[34]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Reading Without Speech Sounds: VWFA and its Connectivity in the Congenitally Deaf. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[36]  Julie A Fiez,et al.  Decoding and disrupting left midfusiform gyrus activity during word reading , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Information-based functional brain mapping. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  Michael Henry Tessler,et al.  Functional connectivity constrains the category‐related organization of human ventral occipitotemporal cortex , 2015, Human brain mapping.

[39]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  High-level visual object representations are constrained by position. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[40]  Hua Shu,et al.  Altered connectivity of the dorsal and ventral visual regions in dyslexic children: a resting-state fMRI study , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[41]  Michael P Milham,et al.  Reading networks at rest. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  Yukihiko Fujii,et al.  Planum Temporale: Where Spoken and Written Language Meet , 2001, European Neurology.

[43]  Xiaoqian J Chai,et al.  Intrinsic Functional Connectivity in the Adult Brain and Success in Second-Language Learning , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  Joseph T Devlin,et al.  The pro and cons of labelling a left occipitotemporal region: “the visual word form area” , 2004, NeuroImage.

[45]  Daniel D. Dilks,et al.  Resting-State Neural Activity across Face-Selective Cortical Regions Is Behaviorally Relevant , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  Bo Zhang,et al.  The orthographic sensitivity to written Chinese in the occipital-temporal cortex , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[47]  S. Dehaene,et al.  How Learning to Read Changes the Cortical Networks for Vision and Language , 2010, Science.

[48]  J H Steiger,et al.  Testing Pattern Hypotheses On Correlation Matrices: Alternative Statistics And Some Empirical Results. , 1980, Multivariate behavioral research.

[49]  Jie Tian,et al.  Resting state neural networks for visual Chinese word processing in Chinese adults and children , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  Alexander Borst,et al.  How does Nature Program Neuron Types? , 2008, Front. Neurosci..

[51]  Adam W. Anderson,et al.  Structural connectivity patterns associated with the putative visual word form area and children׳s reading ability , 2014, Brain Research.

[52]  John C. Trueswell,et al.  Multi-voxel pattern analysis of noun and verb differences in ventral temporal cortex , 2014, Brain and Language.

[53]  Stefan Everling,et al.  Distinct and distributed functional connectivity patterns across cortex reflect the domain-specific constraints of object, face, scene, body, and tool category-selective modules in the ventral visual pathway , 2014, NeuroImage.

[54]  Brenna Argall,et al.  SUMA: an interface for surface-based intra- and inter-subject analysis with AFNI , 2004, 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821).

[55]  Alex Martin,et al.  Shades of Déjerine—Forging a Causal Link between the Visual Word Form Area and Reading , 2006, Neuron.

[56]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Structural Connectivity Fingerprints Predict Cortical Selectivity for Multiple Visual Categories across Cortex. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[57]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Visual word processing and experiential origins of functional selectivity in human extrastriate cortex , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  Real-World Scene Representations in High-Level Visual Cortex: It's the Spaces More Than the Places , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[59]  Maximilian Riesenhuber,et al.  Individual Variability in Location Impacts Orthographic Selectivity in the “Visual Word Form Area” , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.