Source memory performance is modulated by transcranial direct current stimulation over the left posterior parietal cortex

This study employed transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to examine whether the left posterior parietal cortex (LPPC) is causally involved in episodic memory retrieval. Thirty-six participants were assigned to the anodal or the cathodal stimulation group with the block-randomization method and engaged in three source memory tests on three separate days. During the test phase, the participants received anodal or cathodal stimulation over the LPPC scalp region in one visit, sham over the LPPC in another visit, and anodal or cathodal stimulation over the right primary motor cortex (M1) scalp region in the other visit. The results showed that source memory accuracy, but not old/new recognition performance, decreased significantly when participants in the cathodal group received stimulation over the LPPC scalp region in comparison to the other two stimulation conditions. No such effect was found in the anodal group. These findings provide evidence for the causal relationship between the LPPC and episodic memory retrieval.

[1]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up attention to memory: A hypothesis (AtoM) on the role of the posterior parietal cortex in memory retrieval , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  I. Olson,et al.  Bilateral parietal cortex damage does not impair associative memory for paired stimuli , 2009, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[3]  Anthony D Wagner,et al.  Executive Control during Episodic Retrieval Multiple Prefrontal Processes Subserve Source Memory , 2002, Neuron.

[4]  Tracy H. Wang,et al.  Recollection-Related Increases in Functional Connectivity Predict Individual Differences in Memory Accuracy , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Alberto Pisoni,et al.  Separating Recognition Processes of Declarative Memory via Anodal tDCS: Boosting Old Item Recognition by Temporal and New Item Detection by Parietal Stimulation , 2015, PloS one.

[6]  Stefan Elmer,et al.  Behavioral and Brain Functions , 2009 .

[7]  Pierre Maquet,et al.  Brain activity underlying encoding and retrieval of source memory. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  Ingrid R. Olson,et al.  Dissociation Between Memory Accuracy and Memory Confidence Following Bilateral Parietal Lesions , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  Michael D Rugg,et al.  Dissociation of recollection-related neural activity in ventral lateral parietal cortex , 2012, Cognitive neuroscience.

[10]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Attention to Memory and the Environment: Functional Specialization and Dynamic Competition in Human Posterior Parietal Cortex , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Joel L. Voss,et al.  Targeted enhancement of cortical-hippocampal brain networks and associative memory , 2014, Science.

[12]  Paul C. Fletcher,et al.  Is the parietal lobe necessary for recollection in humans? , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  Roberto Cabeza,et al.  Role of parietal regions in episodic memory retrieval: The dual attentional processes hypothesis , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  Roberto Cabeza,et al.  Parietal Lobe and Episodic Memory: Bilateral Damage Causes Impaired Free Recall of Autobiographical Memory , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Rugg,et al.  Episodic memory retrieval: an (event-related) functional neuroimaging perspective , 2002 .

[16]  Giancarlo Zito,et al.  Prefrontal and parietal cortex in human episodic memory: an interference study by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[17]  Melina R. Uncapher,et al.  Posterior parietal cortex and episodic retrieval: convergent and divergent effects of attention and memory. , 2009, Learning & memory.

[18]  C. Juan,et al.  Brain stimulation improves cognitive control by modulating medial‐frontal activity and preSMA‐vmPFC functional connectivity , 2015, Human brain mapping.

[19]  Hongkeun Kim,et al.  Dissociating the roles of the default-mode, dorsal, and ventral networks in episodic memory retrieval , 2010, NeuroImage.

[20]  E. Tulving Memory and consciousness. , 1985 .

[21]  O. Carter,et al.  Evidence that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) generates little-to-no reliable neurophysiologic effect beyond MEP amplitude modulation in healthy human subjects: A systematic review , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  E. D. de Haan,et al.  The posterior parietal paradox: Why do functional magnetic resonance imaging and lesion studies on episodic memory produce conflicting results? , 2011, Journal of neuropsychology.

[23]  Marinella Cappelletti,et al.  Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over posterior parietal cortex enhances distinct aspects of visual working memory , 2016, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  P. Matthews,et al.  Polarity-Sensitive Modulation of Cortical Neurotransmitters by Transcranial Stimulation , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Benjamin J. Shannon,et al.  Parietal lobe contributions to episodic memory retrieval , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  F. Fregni,et al.  Noninvasive Brain Stimulation with Low-Intensity Electrical Currents: Putative Mechanisms of Action for Direct and Alternating Current Stimulation , 2010, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[27]  R. Buckner,et al.  Neural Correlates of Episodic Retrieval Success , 2000, NeuroImage.

[28]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Interference with episodic memory retrieval following transcranial stimulation of the inferior but not the superior parietal lobule , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Dissociation of the neural correlates of recognition memory according to familiarity, recollection, and amount of recollected information , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  O. Tzeng,et al.  Unleashing Potential: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over the Right Posterior Parietal Cortex Improves Change Detection in Low-Performing Individuals , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[32]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up attention-to-memory: Mapping functional connectivity in two distinct networks that underlie cued and uncued recognition memory , 2012, NeuroImage.

[33]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Shauna M. Stark,et al.  Introduction to Memory , 2016 .

[35]  Chu-Ren Huang,et al.  A Data-driven Approach to the Mental Lexicon: Two Studies on Chinese Corpus Linguistics , 1998 .

[36]  J. Gardiner Functional aspects of recollective experience , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[37]  Roberto Cabeza,et al.  Overlapping Parietal Activity in Memory and Perception: Evidence for the Attention to Memory Model , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  H. Jasper,et al.  The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[39]  M. Koslowsky,et al.  tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[40]  T. Shallice,et al.  Recollection and Familiarity in Recognition Memory: An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  L. Cohen,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008 , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[42]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Conceptual and Procedural Shortcomings of the Systematic Review “Evidence That Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Generates Little-to-no Reliable Neurophysiologic Effect Beyond MEP Amplitude Modulation in Healthy Human Subjects: A Systematic Review” by Horvath and Co-workers , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[43]  Men-Tzung Lo,et al.  Revealing the brain's adaptability and the transcranial direct current stimulation facilitating effect in inhibitory control by multiscale entropy , 2014, NeuroImage.

[44]  O. Carter,et al.  Quantitative Review Finds No Evidence of Cognitive Effects in Healthy Populations From Single-session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[45]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  Cognitive contributions of the ventral parietal cortex: an integrative theoretical account , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  Markus Zahn,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: A computer-based human model study , 2007, NeuroImage.

[47]  Mark E Wheeler,et al.  Functional-anatomic correlates of remembering and knowing , 2004, NeuroImage.

[48]  K. Schleifer,et al.  Targeted enhancement of cortical-hippocampal brain networks and associative memory , 2014 .

[49]  J. Simons,et al.  Parietal contributions to recollection: Electrophysiological evidence from aging and patients with parietal lesions , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Physiological Basis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2011, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[51]  L. Davachi,et al.  Behavioral/systems/cognitive Functional–neuroanatomic Correlates of Recollection: Implications for Models of Recognition Memory , 2022 .

[52]  Yadin Dudai,et al.  The posterior parietal cortex in recognition memory: A neuropsychological study , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[53]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  The parietal cortex and episodic memory: an attentional account , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[54]  E. Chua,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the parietal cortex leads to increased false recognition , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[55]  Zara M. Bergström,et al.  Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of Angular Gyrus Reduces Subjective Recollection , 2014, PloS one.

[56]  Ingrid R. Olson,et al.  A selective working memory impairment after transcranial direct current stimulation to the right parietal lobe , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.

[57]  C. Miniussi,et al.  Transcranial brain stimulation studies of episodic memory in young adults, elderly adults and individuals with memory dysfunction: A review , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[58]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  Top-Down and Bottom-Up Attention to Memory Are Dissociated in Posterior Parietal Cortex: Neuroimaging and Neuropsychological Evidence , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[59]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans , 2001, Neurology.

[60]  Patrick S. R. Davidson,et al.  Does lateral parietal cortex support episodic memory? Evidence from focal lesion patients , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[61]  Neil G. Muggleton,et al.  Modulating inhibitory control with direct current stimulation of the superior medial frontal cortex , 2011, NeuroImage.

[62]  Nachum Soroker,et al.  Parietal lesion effects on cued recall following pair associate learning , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[63]  Kaia L. Vilberg,et al.  Memory retrieval and the parietal cortex: A review of evidence from a dual-process perspective , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[64]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.