Exports and Manufacturing Productivity in East Asia: A Comparative Analysis with Firm-Level Data

This paper uses new firm level data from five East Asian countries to explore the patterns of manufacturing productivity across the region. One of the striking patterns that emerges is how the extent of openness and the competitiveness of markets affects the relative productivity of firms across the region. Firms with foreign ownership and firms that export are significantly more productive, and the productivity gap is larger the less developed is the local market. We exploit the rich set of firm characteristics available in the database to explore the sources of export firms' greater productivity. We argue that it is in aiming for export markets that firms make decisions that raise productivity. It is not simply that more-productive firms self-select into exporting; rather, firms that explicitly target export markets consistently make different decisions regarding investment, training, technology and the selection of inputs, and thus raise their productivity.

[1]  David L. Dollar,et al.  Crisis, Adjustment, and Reform in Thailand's Industrial Firms , 2000 .

[2]  Nina Pavcnik,et al.  Trade Liberalization, Exit, and Productivity Improvements: Evidence from Chilean Plants , 2000 .

[3]  Alwyn Young,et al.  The Tyranny of Numbers: Confronting the Statistical Realities of the East Asian Growth Experience , 1994 .

[4]  L. Westphal,et al.  Technology Strategies For Economic Development In A Fast Changing Global Economy , 2002 .

[5]  A. Bernard,et al.  Exceptional Exporter Performance: Cause, Effect, or Both? , 1997 .

[6]  J. Tybout,et al.  Manufacturing Firms in Developing Countries: How Well Do They Do, and Why? , 1998 .

[7]  A. Harrison.  Productivity, imperfect competition and trade reform: Theory and evidence , 1994 .

[8]  A. Kokko,et al.  The Impact of Foreign Investment on Host Countries : A Review of the Empirical Evidence , 1996 .

[9]  Dominque Colaco Francis Hallward-Driemeier Mary Dwor-Frecaut.  Asian corporate recovery : findings from firm-level surveys in five countries , 2000 .

[10]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  R&D Spillovers and Global Growth , 1996, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[11]  J. Gunning,et al.  Exports and Firm - level Efficiency in African Manufacturing , 2000 .

[12]  Chang-tai Hsieh.  Productivity Growth and Factor Prices in East Asia , 1999 .

[13]  J. Tybout,et al.  Trade liberalization and the dimensions of efficiency change in Mexican manufacturing industries , 1995 .

[14]  Mark J. Roberts,et al.  Industrial evolution in developing countries : micro patterns of turnover, productivity, and market structure , 1996 .

[15]  J. Levinsohn.  Testing the Imports-as-Market-Discipline Hypothesis , 1991 .

[16]  F. Meyer.  Market structure and foreign trade: increasing returns, imperfect competition, and the international economy , 1986 .

[17]  J. Levinsohn.  Firm Heterogeneity, Jobs, and International Trade: Evidence from Chile , 1996 .

[18]  A. Pakes,et al.  The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry , 1992 .

[19]  Mona Haddad.  The link between trade liberalization and multi-factor productivity : the case of Morocco , 1993 .

[20]  Kenneth L. Sokoloff,et al.  Patterns of productivity growth in South Korean manufacturing industries, 1963-1979 , 1990 .

[21]  Sukkyun Chung,et al.  Productivity and Turnover in the Export Market: Micro-level Evidence from the Republic of Korea and Taiwan (China) , 2000 .

[22]  D. Rodrik.  Tfpg Controversies, Institutions, and Economic Performance in East Asia , 1997 .

[23]  R. Reinikka,et al.  Confronting Competition Investment Response and Constraints in Uganda , 1999 .

[24]  Kenneth L. Sokoloff,et al.  Was the transition from the artisanal shop to the nonmechanized factory associated with gains in efficiency?: Evidence from the U.S. Manufacturing censuses of 1820 and 1850 , 1984 .

[25]  Romain Wacziarg.  Measuring the Dynamic Gains from Trade , 1998 .

[26]  Joshua D. Angrist,et al.  Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables , 1993 .

[27]  B. Aw,et al.  Productivity and the export market: A firm-level analysis , 1995 .

[28]  Brian Aitken.  Do domestic firms benefit from foreign direct investment? Evidence from panel data , 1994 .

[29]  Gordon H. Hanson,et al.  Spillovers, Foreign Investment, and Export Behavior , 1994 .

[30]  S. Tong,et al.  Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Foreign Direct Investment ? , 2003 .

[31]  Saul Lach,et al.  Is "Learning-by-Exporting" Important? Micro-Dynamic Evidence from Colombia, Mexico and Morocco , 1996 .

[32]  Howard Pack,et al.  Industrial strategy and technological change: theory versus reality , 1986 .

[33]  Mona Haddad,et al.  Are there positive spillovers from direct foreign investment?: Evidence from panel data for Morocco , 1993 .

[34]  Aart C. Kraay.  Exports and economic performance: Evidence from a panel of Chinese , 2002 .

[35]  Alwyn Young.  A Tale of Two Cities: Factor Accumulation and Technical Change in Hong Kong and Singapore , 1992, NBER macroeconomics annual.