Clinical function after primary surgery for oral and oropharyngeal cancer: an 11-item examination.

The aim of this study was to record clinical function using an 11-item clinical examination and identify the main postoperative functional deficits. Of 132 consecutive patients undergoing surgery for previously untreated disease between January 1995 and June 1997, 130 were recruited in the study. An 11-domain clinical examination was made on the day before operation, and at 6 and 12 months afterwards. This examination assessed lip competence, tongue movement, oral mucosa, dental state, mouth opening, speech, drooling, diet, appearance, oral sensation and shoulder movement. Preoperatively there were deficits in natural dentition, consistency of diet and tongue protrusion. Postoperatively functional scores fell particularly for tongue movements, mouth opening, mucosa, dentition, speech, diet, appearance, lip sensation and tongue sensation. At 1 year, dental status, sensation and oral mucosa were particularly defective. Patients with large tumours, free tissue transfer, or adjuvant radiotherapy had the worst levels of function.A simple clinical examination provides a rapid assessment of function that can be used in conjunction with validated questionnaires to provide a more comprehensive evaluation of outcome.

[1]  S. Rogers,et al.  Health-related quality of life and clinical function after primary surgery for oral cancer. , 2002, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[2]  S. Rogers,et al.  A comparison of aesthetic, functional and patient subjective outcomes following lip-split mandibulotomy and mandibular lingual releasing access procedures. , 2001, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[3]  S. Rogers,et al.  Psychologic response of the edentulous patient after primary surgery for oral cancer: A cross-sectional study. , 1999, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[4]  James S. Brown,et al.  The University of Washington head and neck cancer measure as a predictor of outcome following primary surgery for oral cancer , 1999, Head & neck.

[5]  V. Konstantinovic.  Quality of life after surgical excision followed by radiotherapy for cancer of the tongue and floor of the mouth: evaluation of 78 patients. , 1999, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[6]  A. Rademaker,et al.  Factors Related to Dropout in a Study of Head and Neck Cancer Patients after Surgery , 1999, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[7]  V. Konstantinovic,et al.  Articulatory function and tongue mobility after surgery followed by radiotherapy for tongue and floor of the mouth cancer patients. , 1998, British journal of plastic surgery.

[8]  J. Logemann,et al.  Surgical Variables Affecting Speech in Treated Patients With Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancer , 1998, The Laryngoscope.

[9]  R Schönweiler,et al.  Speech, deglutition and life quality after intraoral tumour resection. A prospective study. , 1998, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[10]  S. Stern,et al.  Osseointegrated implants in the head and neck cancer patient , 1997, Head & neck.

[11]  James S. Brown,et al.  Functional outcome in soft palate reconstruction using a radial forearm free flap in conjunction with a superiorly based pharyngeal flap , 1997, Head & neck.

[12]  M. Singer,et al.  A comparison of masticatory function in patients with or without reconstruction of the mandible , 1997, Head & neck.

[13]  M. Dropkin.  Coping with disfigurement/dysfunction and length of hospital stay after head and neck cancer surgery. , 1997, ORL-head and neck nursing : official journal of the Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Nurses.

[14]  D. Savant,et al.  Comparative evaluation of function after surgery for cancer of the alveolobuccal complex. , 1996, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[15]  H. Schliephake,et al.  Prospective study of the quality of life of cancer patients after intraoral tumor surgery. , 1996, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[16]  A. Rademaker,et al.  T stage and functional outcome in oral and oropharyngeal cancer patients , 1996, Head & neck.

[17]  R. Gilbert,et al.  Free forearm flap in oral reconstruction. Functional outcome. , 1995, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[18]  V. Haribhakti,et al.  Oral cavity reconstruction: An objective assessment of function , 1993, Head & neck.

[19]  T. Bundgaard,et al.  A functional evaluation of patients treated for oral cancer. A prospective study. , 1993, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[20]  E. D. Vaughan,et al.  Improvements in morbidity of mouth cancer using microvascular free flap reconstructions. , 1992, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[21]  D. Soutar,et al.  An evaluation of functional outcome after surgery and radiotherapy for intraoral cancer. , 1992, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[22]  Daniel Buchbinder,et al.  Functional evaluation following microvascular oromandibular reconstruction of the oral cancer patient: A comparative study of reconstructed and nonreconstructed patients , 1991, The Laryngoscope.

[23]  C. Blackburn.  A method of assessment in cases of lingual nerve injury. , 1990, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[24]  J. Teichgraeber,et al.  Functional analysis of treatment of oral cavity cancer. , 1986, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[25]  J. Teichgraeber,et al.  New test series for the functional evaluation of oral cavity cancer. , 1985, Head & neck surgery.