A familiarity disadvantage for remembering specific images of faces.

Familiar faces are remembered better than unfamiliar faces. Furthermore, it is much easier to match images of familiar than unfamiliar faces. These findings could be accounted for by quantitative differences in the ease with which faces are encoded. However, it has been argued that there are also some qualitative differences in familiar and unfamiliar face processing. Unfamiliar faces are held to rely on superficial, pictorial representations, whereas familiar faces invoke more abstract representations. Here we present 2 studies that show, for 1 task, an advantage for unfamiliar faces. In recognition memory, viewers are better able to reject a new picture, if it depicts an unfamiliar face. This rare advantage for unfamiliar faces supports the notion that familiarity brings about some representational changes, and further emphasizes the idea that theoretical accounts of face processing should incorporate familiarity. (PsycINFO Database Record

[1]  M. Eimer,et al.  The Focus of Spatial Attention Determines the Number and Precision of Face Representations in Working Memory. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  A. D. Yarmey,et al.  Recognition memory for familiar “public” faces: Effects of orientation and delay , 1971 .

[3]  R. Johnston,et al.  Exploring Levels of Face Familiarity by Using an Indirect Face-Matching Measure , 2002, Perception.

[4]  Alberta Ipser,et al.  Exemplar Variance Supports Robust Learning of Facial Identity , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  Differential sensitivity for viewpoint between familiar and unfamiliar faces in human visual cortex , 2008, NeuroImage.

[6]  The locus of semantic priming effects in person recognition , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[7]  A. Burton,et al.  Variability in photos of the same face , 2011, Cognition.

[8]  M. Myles-Worsley,et al.  The influence of expertise on X-ray image processing. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Stimulus-specific effects in face recognition over changes in viewpoint , 1998, Vision Research.

[10]  H. Ellis,et al.  Identification of Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces from Internal and External Features: Some Implications for Theories of Face Recognition , 1979, Perception.

[11]  P. Sessa,et al.  Race perception and gaze direction differently impair visual working memory for faces: An event-related potential study , 2016, Social neuroscience.

[12]  Stefan R Schweinberger,et al.  Event-related potentials indicate different processes to mediate categorical and associative priming in person recognition. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  Eleanor A. Maguire,et al.  The effect of navigational expertise on wayfinding in new environments , 2010, Journal of environmental psychology.

[14]  R L Klatzky,et al.  Recognizing familiar and unfamiliar faces , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[15]  A. Burton,et al.  Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[16]  V. Bruce,et al.  Effects of lighting on the perception of facial surfaces. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Isabelle Bülthoff,et al.  Gaze behavior in face comparison: The roles of sex, task, and symmetry , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[18]  Andrew W. Young,et al.  Social inferences from faces: Ambient images generate a three-dimensional model , 2013, Cognition.

[19]  V. Bruce Influences of Familiarity on the Processing of Faces , 1986, Perception.

[20]  Ahmed M. Megreya,et al.  Hits and false positives in face matching: A familiarity-based dissociation , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  Daniel D. Dilks,et al.  Domain-specific development of face memory but not face perception. , 2014, Developmental science.

[22]  S. Andrews,et al.  Telling faces together: Learning new faces through exposure to multiple instances , 2015, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  Tim Valentine,et al.  CCTV on trial: Matching video images with the defendant in the dock , 2009 .

[24]  A. Young,et al.  Repetition Priming and Face Processing: Priming Occurs within the System that Responds to the Identity of a Face , 1990, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[25]  John R. Vokey,et al.  Changing photos of faces: effects of exposure duration and photo similarity on recognition and the accuracy−confidence relationship , 1990 .

[26]  H. Ellis,et al.  The emotional impact of faces (but not names): Face specific changes in skin conductance responses to familiar and unfamiliar people , 1999 .

[27]  Jie Sui,et al.  Transfer between pose and illumination training in face recognition. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  John R. Vokey,et al.  The Face-Space Typicality Paradox: Understanding the Face-Space Metaphor , 1998 .

[29]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  Activity in the right fusiform face area predicts the behavioural advantage for the perception of familiar faces , 2015, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  Rob Jenkins,et al.  Unfamiliar Face Perception , 2011 .

[31]  R. Johnston,et al.  Matching as an index of face familiarity , 2004 .

[32]  A. Burton,et al.  The Glasgow Face Matching Test , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[33]  Emanuel Schmider,et al.  Is It Really Robust , 2010 .

[34]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[35]  Vaidehi S. Natu,et al.  The neural processing of familiar and unfamiliar faces: a review and synopsis. , 2011, British journal of psychology.

[36]  A. Burton,et al.  Passport Officers’ Errors in Face Matching , 2014, PloS one.

[37]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  Andrew W Young,et al.  Learning faces from photographs. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  Maria A. Bobes,et al.  Timing and Tuning for Familiarity of Cortical Responses to Faces , 2013, PloS one.

[40]  A. Baddeley,et al.  When face recognition fails. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[41]  V. Bruce,et al.  Face Recognition in Poor-Quality Video: Evidence From Security Surveillance , 1999 .

[42]  Susanne Huber,et al.  Gaze behavior in analytical and holistic face processing , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[43]  V. Bruce,et al.  Matching identities of familiar and unfamiliar faces caught on CCTV images. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[44]  V. Bruce,et al.  Recognition of unfamiliar faces , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[45]  H D Ellis,et al.  Covert face recognition without prosopagnosia. , 1993, Behavioural neurology.

[46]  S. Penrod,et al.  Meta-analysis of facial identification studies. , 1986 .

[47]  R. Johnston,et al.  Demonstrating how unfamiliar faces become familiar using a face matching task , 2005 .

[48]  A. Todorov,et al.  Misleading First Impressions , 2014, Psychological science.

[49]  P. Sessa,et al.  On the neglected role of stereotypes in empathy toward other-race pain , 2015, Social neuroscience.

[50]  Peter J. B. Hancock,et al.  From Pixels to People: A Model of Familiar Face Recognition , 1999 .

[51]  Itiel E. Dror,et al.  The Paradoxical Brain: The paradox of human expertise: why experts get it wrong , 2011 .

[52]  Andrew J. Edmonds,et al.  Familiar and unfamiliar face recognition: A review , 2009, Memory.

[53]  B. Duchaine,et al.  The Cambridge Face Memory Test for Children (CFMT-C): A new tool for measuring face recognition skills in childhood , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[54]  Ahmed M Megreya,et al.  Matching faces to photographs: poor performance in eyewitness memory (without the memory). , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[55]  Shawn Barr,et al.  The perception of a familiar face is no more than the sum of its parts , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[56]  Paul Miller,et al.  Verification of face identities from images captured on video. , 1999 .

[57]  A. Mike Burton,et al.  Why has research in face recognition progressed so slowly? The importance of variability , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[58]  Ahmed M. Megreya,et al.  Unfamiliar faces are not faces: Evidence from a matching task , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[59]  V. Bruce Stability from Variation: The Case of Face Recognition the M.D. Vernon Memorial Lecture , 1994, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[60]  G. Pike,et al.  When Seeing should not be Believing: Photographs, Credit Cards and Fraud , 1997 .

[61]  Shimon Ullman,et al.  Face Recognition: The Problem of Compensating for Changes in Illumination Direction , 1994, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..