P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli

[1]  N. Squires,et al.  Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  E. Courchesne,et al.  Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  E Courchesne,et al.  Changes in P3 waves with event repetition: long-term effects on scalp distribution and amplitude. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  The effect of stimulus deviation on P3 waves to easily recognized stimuli , 1978, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  J. Ford,et al.  Age-related changes in auditory event-related potentials. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  R Galambos,et al.  Autism: processing of novel auditory information assessed by event-related brain potentials. , 1984, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  R. Knight.  Decreased response to novel stimuli after prefrontal lesions in man. , 1984, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  J. Polich,et al.  Attention, probability, and task demands as determinants of P300 latency from auditory stimuli. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  H. Semlitsch,et al.  A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[11]  J. Polich,et al.  Task difficulty, probability, and inter-stimulus interval as determinants of P300 from auditory stimuli. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  A Pfefferbaum,et al.  ERPs to stimuli requiring response production and inhibition: effects of age, probability and visual noise. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[14]  E Courchesne,et al.  Effects of rare non-target stimuli on brain electrophysiological activity and performance. , 1990, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[15]  Ray Johnson,et al.  Event-related brain potentials : basic issues and applications , 1990 .

[16]  R. Knight,et al.  P300 generation by novel somatosensory stimuli. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  T W Picton,et al.  The P300 Wave of the Human Event‐Related Potential , 1992, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[18]  L. Squire,et al.  P300 from amnesic patients with bilateral hippocampal lesions. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  R. Johnson,et al.  On the neural generators of the P300 component of the event-related potential. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[20]  D Friedman,et al.  Age-related changes in scalp topography to novel and target stimuli. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[21]  L. Squire,et al.  P300 from amnesic patients with bilateral hippocampal lesions. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  J. Ford,et al.  The relationship between P300 amplitude and regional gray matter volumes depends upon the attentional system engaged. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[23]  G. V. Simpson,et al.  ERP amplitude and scalp distribution to target and novel events: effects of temporal order in young, middle-aged and older adults. , 1994, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[24]  E. Halgren,et al.  Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. III. Frontal cortex. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[25]  E. Halgren,et al.  Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. II. Medial, lateral and posterior temporal lobe. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[26]  E. Halgren,et al.  Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. I. Superior temporal plane and parietal lobe. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[27]  J. Polich,et al.  P300, probability, and the three-tone paradigm. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[28]  J. Polich,et al.  P300 topography and modality effects from a single-stimulus paradigm. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[29]  R. Knight.  Contribution of human hippocampal region to novelty detection , 1996, Nature.

[30]  J. Polich,et al.  P300 from one-, two-, and three-stimulus auditory paradigms. , 1996, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[31]  R. Verleger.  On the utility of P3 latency as an index of mental chronometry. , 1997, Psychophysiology.

[32]  J. Polich,et al.  P300 from a single-stimulus paradigm: passive versus active tasks and stimulus modality. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[33]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Infrequent events transiently activate human prefrontal and parietal cortex as measured by functional MRI. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  C. Kemner,et al.  Processing capacity and the frontal P3. , 1997, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[35]  R. Knight.  Distributed Cortical Network for Visual Attention , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  J. Polich.  P300 clinical utility and control of variability. , 1998, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[37]  J. Polich,et al.  Stimulus context determines P3a and P3b. , 1998, Psychophysiology.