Agent Above, Atom Below: How Agents Causally Emerge from Their Underlying Microphysics

Some physical entities, which we often refer to as agents, can be described as having intentions and engaging in goal-oriented behavior. Yet agents can also be described in terms of low-level dynamics that are mindless, intention-less, and without goals or purpose. How we can reconcile these seemingly disparate levels of description? This is especially problematic because the lower scales at first appear more fundamental in three ways: in terms of their causal work, in terms of the amount of information they contain, and their theoretical superiority in terms of model choice. However, recent research bringing information theory to bear on modeling systems at different scales significantly reframes the issue. I argue that agents, with their associated intentions and goal-oriented behavior, can actually causally emerge from their underlying microscopic physics. This is particularly true of agents because they are autopoietic and possess (apparent) teleological causal relationships.

[1]  H. Maturana,et al.  Autopoiesis and Cognition , 1980 .

[2]  Larissa Albantakis,et al.  Black-boxing and cause-effect power , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[3]  N. Block Do Causal Powers Drain Away , 2003 .

[4]  T. Bontly The Supervenience Argument Generalizes , 2002 .

[5]  M. Pigliucci,et al.  Phenotypic Evolution: A Reaction Norm Perspective , 1998 .

[6]  Erik P. Hoel,et al.  Quantifying causal emergence shows that macro can beat micro , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Mathias Frisch,et al.  Causal Reasoning in Physics , 2014 .

[8]  R. Sperry A modified concept of consciousness. , 1969, Psychological review.

[9]  D. Kahneman Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics , 2003 .

[10]  B. Skinner,et al.  The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis , 2016 .

[11]  Arend Hintze,et al.  Evolutionary game theory using agent-based methods. , 2014, Physics of life reviews.

[12]  G. Bateson,et al.  STEPS TO AN ECOLOGY OF MIND COLLECTED ESSAYS IN ANTHROPOLOGY, PSYCHIATRY, EVOLUTION, AND EPISTEMOLOGY , 2006 .

[13]  J. Fodor Special sciences (or: The disunity of science as a working hypothesis) , 1974, Synthese.

[14]  Erik P. Hoel When the Map Is Better Than the Territory , 2016, Entropy.

[15]  Denis Noble,et al.  A theory of biological relativity: no privileged level of causation , 2012, Interface Focus.

[16]  George F. R. Ellis,et al.  How can physics underlie the mind , 2016 .

[17]  Jeremy L. England,et al.  Statistical physics of self-replication. , 2012, The Journal of chemical physics.

[18]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[19]  W. Ashby,et al.  An Introduction to Cybernetics , 1957 .

[20]  Filippo Castiglione Agent based modeling , 2006, Scholarpedia.

[21]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Measuring information integration , 2003, BMC Neuroscience.

[22]  Jaegwon Kim Mind in a Physical World: An Essay on the Mind-Body Problem and Mental Causation , 2001 .

[23]  Solomon Kullback,et al.  Information Theory and Statistics , 1960 .

[24]  John H. Conway,et al.  The game of life. , 1996, The Hastings Center report.

[25]  W. James,et al.  The Principles of Psychology. , 1983 .

[26]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  The mathematical theory of communication , 1950 .

[27]  J. Fodor,et al.  A Theory of Content and Other Essays. , 1992 .