Final results from a randomized phase 3 study of FOLFIRI {+/-} panitumumab for second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND The study 20050181 demonstrated significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS), objective response, and a nonsignificant trend toward increased overall survival (OS) with panitumumab-FOLFIRI versus FOLFIRI alone for second-line wild-type (WT) KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Updated long-term data from a prespecified descriptive analysis are reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients receiving one prior mCRC treatment were randomly assigned (1:1) to panitumumab (6.0 mg/kg)-FOLFIRI versus FOLFIRI every 2 weeks. Co-primary end points (PFS and OS) were prospectively analyzed by tumor KRAS status. RESULTS One thousand one hundred and eighty-six patients were randomly assigned. In patients with WT KRAS tumors, panitumumab-FOLFIRI significantly improved PFS versus FOLFIRI [median 6.7 versus 4.9 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.82 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69, 0.97]; P = 0.023]. A trend toward longer OS was observed (median 14.5 versus 12.5 months; HR 0.92 [95% CI 0.78, 1.10]; P = 0.37). Response rates improved from 10% to 36% (P < 0.0001). From post hoc analyses in patients receiving prior oxaliplatin-bevacizumab, panitumumab-FOLFIRI improved PFS (median 6.4 versus 3.7 months; HR 0.58 [95% CI 0.37, 0.90]; P = 0.014). PFS and OS appeared longer for worst-grade skin toxicity of 2-4, versus 0-1 or FOLFIRI. Safety results were as previously reported and consistent with the known toxicities with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy. CONCLUSIONS These data confirm the primary efficacy and safety findings of this trial and support panitumumab-FOLFIRI as a second-line treatment of WT KRAS mCRC.

[1]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Intrapatient cetuximab dose escalation in metastatic colorectal cancer according to the grade of early skin reactions: the randomized EVEREST study. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  E. Vasile,et al.  Cetuximab plus irinotecan after irinotecan failure in elderly metastatic colorectal cancer patients: clinical outcome according to KRAS and BRAF mutational status. , 2011, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[3]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global Cancer Statistics , 2011 .

[4]  R. Greil,et al.  First-line panitumumab plus irinotecan/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer , 2011, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[5]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Randomized phase III study of panitumumab with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) compared with FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  Josep Tabernero,et al.  Randomized, phase III trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-line treatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the PRIME study. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  M. Stockler,et al.  Capecitabine, bevacizumab, and mitomycin in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: results of the Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group Randomized Phase III MAX Study. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Advanced colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for treatment. , 2010, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[9]  S. Dakhil,et al.  A phase II trial of FOLFOX6 and cetuximab in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2010, Clinical colorectal cancer.

[10]  R. Pearson,et al.  Cetuximab and Chemotherapy as Initial Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer , 2010 .

[11]  J. Kim,et al.  The Role of KRAS Mutations in Predicting the Efficacy of Cetuximab-Plus-Irinotecan Therapy in Irinotecan-Refractory Korean Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients , 2009, Oncology.

[12]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Association of progression‐free survival, overall survival, and patient‐reported outcomes by skin toxicity and KRAS status in patients receiving panitumumab monotherapy , 2009, Cancer.

[13]  F.A.M. Bordonaba,et al.  Wild-Type KRAS Is Required for Panitumumab Efficacy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer , 2009 .

[14]  W. Scheithauer,et al.  EPIC: phase III trial of cetuximab plus irinotecan after fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin failure in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  W. Scheithauer,et al.  Bevacizumab in Combination With Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy As First-Line Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Phase III Study , 2023, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  KRAS wild-type state predicts survival and is associated to early radiological response in metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. , 2008, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[17]  Dongsheng Tu,et al.  Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Sung Sook Lee,et al.  A Phase II Study of Cetuximab (Erbitux®) plus FOLFIRI for Irinotecan and Oxaliplatin-refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer , 2007, Journal of Korean medical science.

[19]  Marc Peeters,et al.  Open-label phase III trial of panitumumab plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  Manuel Hidalgo,et al.  Expression of epiregulin and amphiregulin and K-ras mutation status predict disease control in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  P. Catalano,et al.  Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX4) for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E3200. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  T. Frebourg,et al.  Clinical relevance of KRAS mutation detection in metastatic colorectal cancer treated by Cetuximab plus chemotherapy , 2007, British Journal of Cancer.

[23]  A. Lièvre,et al.  KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer. , 2006, Cancer research.

[24]  Ma Dong,et al.  Bevacizumab plus Irinotecan,Fluorouracil,and Leucovorin for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer , 2006 .

[25]  Z. Hua Cetuximab Monotherapy and Cetuximab plus Irinotecan in Irinotecan-Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer , 2006 .

[26]  E. Van Cutsem,et al.  Clinical signs, pathophysiology and management of skin toxicity during therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[27]  M. van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[28]  M Van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.