How Do Community Associations Vary? The Structure of Community Associations in Calgary, Alberta

The growth in territorial community associations has been one of the major trends in Western cities in recent years, but there are few comprehensive studies of the range of variation of these organisations in a single city. This case study of Calgary, a Canadian city of three-quarters of a million people in 1991, addresses this gap in our understanding by showing the variation in the character of all 118 community associations in the city. The city contained 94 local community buildings; 21 with an insured value of over 1m dollars. Yet membership levels were relatively low with a mean of 18.9 per cent. A factor analysis of 11 key variables of the variations in community association characteristics revealed 5 basic sources of differentiation, summarised as: resources; programmes and organisation; age and rental revenue dependency; membership; and salaries. A further factor analysis of the social structural characteristics of the community areas identified nine axes called: economic status; family status; age-participation; early middle age; mobility; immigrant-Charter Group; each European ethnic; central and southern European ethnic; and Dutch ethnic-old housing. In general, there were few strong associations between the two sets of generalised axes, demonstrating that the contextual effects of the variations in community association activity were not strong. The only exceptions were that membership levels had medium positive correlates with economic status, and old age areas had community associations that depended highly on revenues from the rental of community facilities to non-member groups.

[1]  W. Johnson.  Citizen participation in local planning in the U.K. and U.S.A.: A comparative study , 1984 .

[2]  R. Rich.  A Political-Economy Approach to the Study of Neighborhood Organizations , 1980 .

[3]  Christopher Silver,et al.  Neighborhood Planning in Historical Perspective , 1985 .

[4]  W. Davies,et al.  CONSISTENCY AND DIFFERENTIAL IMPACT IN URBAN SOCIAL DIMENSIONALITY: INTRA-URBAN VARIATIONS IN THE 24 METROPOLITAN AREAS OF CANADA , 1991 .

[5]  S. Keller.  The American dream of community: An unfinished agenda , 1988 .

[6]  D. Warren,et al.  The Functional Diversity of Urban Neighborhoods , 1977 .

[7]  Neighborhood Associations, Political Repertoires and Neighborhood Exits , 1989 .

[8]  Economic Diversification and Group Stability in an Urban System: The Case of Canada, 1951-86 , 1993 .

[9]  Barrett A. Lee,et al.  Testing the Decline-of-Community Thesis: Neighborhood Organizations in Seattle, 1929 and 1979 , 1984, American Journal of Sociology.

[10]  Community Mobilization , 1989 .

[11]  Clyde Mitchell-Weaver.  Community Development in North America: Survey and Prospect for the 1990s , 1990 .

[12]  Cees J. H. Midden,et al.  Social Dimensions of Neighborhoods and the Effectiveness of Information Programs , 1990 .

[13]  B. Wellman,et al.  Networks, Neighborhoods, and Communities , 1979 .

[14]  Philip Olson,et al.  Urban Neighborhood Research , 1982 .

[15]  J. Logan,et al.  Neighborhood Associations , 1990 .

[16]  R. S. Oropesa,et al.  Local and extra-local orientations in the metropolis , 1987 .

[17]  W. Davies.  What population turnaround? Some Canadian prairie settlement perspectives, 1971-1986. , 1990, Geoforum; journal of physical, human, and regional geosciences.