The benefits of nuclear flexibility in power system operations with renewable energy

Nuclear power plants are commonly operated in a “baseload” mode at maximum rated capacity whenever online. However, nuclear power plants are technically capable of flexible operation, including changing power output over time (ramping or load following) and providing frequency regulation and operating reserves. At the same time, flexibility is becoming more valuable as many regions transition to low-carbon power systems with higher shares of variable renewable energy sources such as wind or solar power. We present a novel mixed integer linear programming formulation to more accurately represent the distinct technical operating constraints of nuclear power stations, including impacts of xenon transients in the reactor core and changing core reactivity over the fuel irradiation cycle. This novel representation of nuclear flexibility is integrated into a unit commitment and economic dispatch model for the power system. In a case study using representative utility data from the Southwest United States, we investigate the potential impacts of flexible nuclear operations in a power system with significant solar and wind energy penetration. We find that flexible nuclear operation lowers power system operating costs, increases reactor owner revenues, and substantially reduces curtailment of renewables.

[1]  Zhi Zhou,et al.  Integrating Solar PV in Utility System Operations , 2014 .

[2]  Orvika Rosnes Subsidies for renewable energy in inflexible power markets , 2014 .

[3]  Yuanfu Xie,et al.  Future cost-competitive electricity systems and their impact on US CO2 emissions , 2016 .

[4]  Jing Wu,et al.  Integrating solar PV (photovoltaics) in utility system operations: Analytical framework and Arizona case study , 2015 .

[5]  Cristian Rabiti,et al.  Optimal sizing of flexible nuclear hybrid energy system components considering wind volatility , 2018 .

[6]  Peter Lund,et al.  Review of energy system flexibility measures to enable high levels of variable renewable electricity , 2015 .

[7]  Hendrik Kondziella,et al.  Flexibility requirements of renewable energy based electricity systems – a review of research results and methodologies , 2016 .

[8]  Mohammad Shahidehpour,et al.  The IEEE Reliability Test System-1996. A report prepared by the Reliability Test System Task Force of the Application of Probability Methods Subcommittee , 1999 .

[9]  S. Stoft Power System Economics: Designing Markets for Electricity , 2002 .

[10]  Dacheng Li,et al.  Load shifting of nuclear power plants using cryogenic energy storage technology , 2014 .

[11]  Igor Kuzle,et al.  Low carbon technologies as providers of operational flexibility in future power systems , 2016, Applied Energy.

[12]  Bryan Palmintier,et al.  Impact of operational flexibility on electricity generation planning with renewable and carbon targets , 2016, 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM).

[13]  Bilge Yildiz,et al.  Nuclear hydrogen : an assessment of product flexibility and market viability. , 2008 .

[14]  Paul Denholm,et al.  Grid flexibility and storage required to achieve very high penetration of variable renewable electricity , 2011 .

[15]  Audun Botterud,et al.  Electricity market design for generator revenue sufficiency with increased variable generation , 2015 .

[16]  P. Denholm,et al.  Renewable Electricity Futures for the United States , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[17]  J. H. Nelson,et al.  Power system balancing for deep decarbonization of the electricity sector , 2016 .

[18]  Zhi Zhou,et al.  Profitability Evaluation of Load-Following Nuclear Units with Physics-Induced Operational Constraints , 2017 .

[19]  Goran Strbac,et al.  Co-Optimization of Generation Expansion Planning and Electric Vehicles Flexibility , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[20]  Audun Botterud,et al.  The value of energy storage in decarbonizing the electricity sector , 2016 .