Combination of ARFI Excitation Powers and Acquisitions at Diastole and Systole for Improving Automatic Segmentation of Vulnerable Carotid Plaque Features

Delineating carotid plaque components that confer rupture risk is vital to stoke prevention. We have previously shown that combining temporal profiles of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse (ARFI)-induced displacement, cross-correlation coefficient, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) as the input feature set to a machine learning classifier enabled the classifier to differentiate intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH), lipid-rich necrotic core (LRNC), collagen (COL), and calcium (CAL) plaque components, with accurate fibrous cap thickness measurement. We hypothesize that machine learning-based classification of carotid plaque structure and composition will be improved by including more information in the input feature set. This study analyzed six carotid plaques imaged in vivo in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy CEA). Data were acquired with ECG gating to diastole and to systole, with and without ARF excitation. From these data, temporal profiles of displacement, crosscorrelation coefficient (CC), and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were generated and used as inputs to a support vector machine classifier. The classifier was trained and tested using spatially matched histology. Over all examined plaques, combining acquisitions at systole and diastole, with and without ARFI push, achieved CNRs that were statistically higher than any one or combination of two inputs. These results suggest that the performance of a machine learning classifier for automatic plaque feature delineation can be improved by optimizing the feature set, with clinical relevance to in vivo human carotid plaque feature delineation herein demonstrated.

[1]  Gregg E. Trahey,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of the Magnitude, Impact and Spatial Extent of Ultrasonic Clutter , 2008, Ultrasonic imaging.

[2]  P. Moreno,et al.  Vulnerable plaque: definition, diagnosis, and treatment. , 2010, Cardiology clinics.

[3]  M. Fink,et al.  Quantitative assessment of arterial wall biomechanical properties using shear wave imaging. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[4]  G. Soulez,et al.  Assessment of Carotid Artery Plaque Components With Machine Learning Classification Using Homodyned-K Parametric Maps and Elastograms , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[5]  Gregg E Trahey,et al.  Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging of the mechanical properties of arteries: in vivo and ex vivo results. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[6]  C. Gallippi,et al.  A Machine Learning Approach to Delineating Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque Structure and Composition by ARFI Ultrasound, In Vivo , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS).

[7]  R. Virmani,et al.  Concept of vulnerable/unstable plaque. , 2010, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[8]  W. Walker,et al.  A fundamental limit on delay estimation using partially correlated speckle signals , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[9]  Tomasz J. Czernuszewicz,et al.  Delineation of Human Carotid Plaque Features In Vivo by Exploiting Displacement Variance , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[10]  Chris L de Korte,et al.  Compound Ultrasound Strain Imaging for Noninvasive Detection of (Fibro)Atheromatous Plaques: Histopathological Validation in Human Carotid Arteries. , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[11]  S. Nduwayo,et al.  Shear wave elastography imaging of carotid plaques: feasible, reproducible and of clinical potential , 2014, Cardiovascular Ultrasound.

[12]  Tomasz J. Czernuszewicz,et al.  Performance of acoustic radiation force impulse ultrasound imaging for carotid plaque characterization with histologic validation , 2017, Journal of vascular surgery.

[13]  Francesca N. Delling,et al.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association , 2019, Circulation.

[14]  P. Shah,et al.  Mechanisms of plaque vulnerability and rupture. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  Tomasz J. Czernuszewicz,et al.  Carotid Plaque Fibrous Cap Thickness Measurement by ARFI Variance of Acceleration: In Vivo Human Results , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  M. Doyley,et al.  Visualizing angle-independent principal strains in the longitudinal view of the carotid artery: Phantom and in vivo evaluation , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS).

[17]  Caterina M. Gallippi,et al.  Blind source separation-based tracking of ARFIinduced displacements for improved automatic delineation of carotid plaque components in humans, in vivo , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS).

[18]  G.E. Trahey,et al.  Rapid tracking of small displacements with ultrasound , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[19]  E. Connolly,et al.  Pulse Wave Imaging in Carotid Artery Stenosis Human Patients in Vivo. , 2019, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[20]  Tomy Varghese,et al.  Classification of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients with and without Cognitive Decline Using Non-invasive Carotid Plaque Strain Indices as Biomarkers. , 2016, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.