Classification of sheep urination events using accelerometers to aid improved measurements of livestock contributions to nitrous oxide emissions

Abstract Livestock emissions account for 74% of nitrous oxide contributions to greenhouse gases in the UK. However, it remains uncertain how much is directly attributable to localised sheep urination events, which could generate nitrous oxide emission ‘hot spots’. Currently, IPCC emission factors are mainly extrapolated from lowland grazing systems and do not incorporate temporal or spatial factors related to sheep behaviour and movement. Being able to gather data that reliably measures when, where, and how much sheep urinate is necessary for accurate calculations and, to inform best management practices for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and minimizing emission-based climate change. Animal-attached movement sensors have been shown to be effective in classifying different behaviours, albeit with varying classification accuracy depending on behaviour types. Previous studies have used accelerometers on cattle and sheep to assess active and non-active behaviours to help with grazing management, although no study has yet attempted to identify sheep urination events using this method. We attached tri-axial accelerometer sensor tags to thirty Welsh Mountain ewes for thirty days to assess if we could identify urination events. We used random forest models using different sliding mean windows to classify behaviours. Urination had a distinctive pattern and could be identified from accelerometer data, with a 5 s window providing the best recall and a 10 s window giving the best precision. ‘State’ behaviours considered (foraging, walking, running, standing and lying down) were also identified with high recall and precision. This demonstrates the extent to which the identification of discrete ‘event’ behaviours may be sensitive to the window size used to calculate the summary statistics. The method shows promise for identifying urination in sheep and other livestock, being minimally invasive compared to other methods, and has clear potential to inform agricultural management practices and policies.

[1]  K. F. O'connor,et al.  The grazing behaviour of sheep (Ovis aries) on a high-country summer range in Canterbury, New Zealand. , 1980 .

[2]  Hamed Haddadi,et al.  Determining association networks in social animals: choosing spatial–temporal criteria and sampling rates , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[3]  Andrew J. King,et al.  Identification of behaviours from accelerometer data in a wild social primate , 2017, Animal Biotelemetry.

[4]  Stephen A. Ellwood,et al.  Use of tri-axial accelerometers to assess terrestrial mammal behaviour in the wild. , 2016 .

[5]  R. Bryant,et al.  Use of a urine meter to detect variation in urination behaviour of dairy cows on winter crops , 2015 .

[6]  S. Wanless,et al.  Can Ethograms Be Automatically Generated Using Body Acceleration Data from Free-Ranging Birds? , 2009, PloS one.

[7]  Ran Nathan,et al.  Using tri-axial acceleration data to identify behavioral modes of free-ranging animals: general concepts and tools illustrated for griffon vultures , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[8]  Matthew Rutishauser,et al.  Movement, resting, and attack behaviors of wild pumas are revealed by tri-axial accelerometer measurements , 2015, Movement ecology.

[9]  T. Misselbrook,et al.  Automated monitoring of urination events from grazing cattle , 2016 .

[10]  V. H. Oddy,et al.  Using a three-axis accelerometer to identify and classify sheep behaviour at pasture , 2016 .

[11]  Michael Scantlebury,et al.  Tri-axial accelerometers quantify behaviour in the Eurasian badger (Meles meles): towards an automated interpretation of field data , 2014, Animal Biotelemetry.

[12]  D. R. Cutler,et al.  Utah State University From the SelectedWorks of , 2017 .

[13]  Andy Liaw,et al.  Classification and Regression by randomForest , 2007 .

[14]  Thair Nu Phyu Survey of Classification Techniques in Data Mining , 2009 .

[15]  K. Betteridge,et al.  Why we need to know what and where cows are urinating - a urine sensor to improve nitrogen models , 2013 .

[16]  Davey L. Jones,et al.  The urine patch diffusional area: An important N2O source? , 2016 .

[17]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[18]  Jiafa Luo,et al.  Nitrous oxide emission factors for urine from sheep and cattle fed forage rape (Brassica napus L.) or perennial ryegrass/white clover pasture (Lolium perenne L./Trifolium repens) , 2016 .

[19]  David G. Renter,et al.  Evaluation of three-dimensional accelerometers to monitor and classify behavior patterns in cattle , 2009 .

[20]  M. Kolehmainen,et al.  Cow behaviour pattern recognition using a three-dimensional accelerometer and support vector machines , 2009 .

[21]  Hamed Haddadi,et al.  Data-loggers carried on a harness do not adversely affect sheep locomotion. , 2012, Research in veterinary science.

[22]  K. Betteridge,et al.  Evaluation of refractive index for measuring urinary nitrogen concentration in a sensor worn by grazing female cattle , 2017 .

[23]  K. Betteridge,et al.  Sensors for detecting and logging spatial distribution of urine patches of grazing female sheep and cattle , 2010 .