Exposure controlled projection lithography for microlens fabrication

An Exposure Controlled Projection Lithography (ECPL) process with the ability to fabricate microlenses on transparent substrates is presented. This process (also referred to as maskless lithography) can be used to create polymer microlenses on flat or curved substrates without involving hard tooling. Incident radiation, patterned by a dynamic mask, passes through a transparent substrate to cure photopolymer resin that grows progressively from the substrate surface. A process planning algorithm which incorporates the effects of optical aberrations present in the ECPL system and photopolymer's response to irradiation is presented. An interferometric process monitoring system is also presented which can be used to control the process in real time. Samples of micro optical elements fabricated on flat and non-planar substrates using the ECPL system are also presented, which demonstrate the wide range of fabrication capability of our ECPL process.

[1]  Lars Erdmann,et al.  MOEMS-based lithography for the fabrication of micro-optical components , 2005 .

[2]  David W. Rosen,et al.  Process planning method for mask projection micro‐stereolithography , 2007 .

[3]  David W. Rosen,et al.  A Process Planning Method for Thin Film Mask Projection Micro-Stereolithography , 2009 .

[4]  Masatoshi Nishimura,et al.  A novel microchip for capillary electrophoresis with acrylic microchannel fabricated on photosensor array , 2002 .

[5]  S. Zissi,et al.  Microstereophotolithography using a liquid crystal display as dynamic mask-generator , 1997 .

[6]  O. Dudi,et al.  Laser interferometric technique for measuring polymer cure kinetics , 1999 .

[7]  M. T. Kelly,et al.  Laser interferometric method for measuring linear polymerization shrinkage in light cured dental restoratives. , 2002, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[8]  David W. Rosen,et al.  Two-Dimensional Real-Time Interferometric Monitoring System for Exposure Controlled Projection Lithography , 2012 .

[9]  T. Norisuye,et al.  THE ROLES OF REACTION INHOMOGENEITY IN PHASE SEPARATION KINETICS AND MORPHOLOGY OF REACTIVE POLYMER BLENDS , 2009 .

[10]  Paul F. Jacobs,et al.  Rapid Prototyping & Manufacturing: Fundamentals of Stereolithography , 1992 .

[11]  P Birch,et al.  UV Microstereolithography System that uses Spatial Light Modulator Technology. , 1998, Applied optics.

[12]  Serge Monneret,et al.  Microstereolithography using a dynamic mask generator and a noncoherent visible light source , 1999, Design, Test, Integration, and Packaging of MEMS/MOEMS.

[13]  Q. Tran‐Cong‐Miyata,et al.  Local deformation in photo‐crosslinked polymer blends monitored by Mach‐Zehnder interferometry , 2005 .

[14]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Data clustering: a review , 1999, CSUR.

[15]  David W. Rosen,et al.  Modeling effects of oxygen inhibition in mask‐based stereolithography , 2011 .

[16]  Nicholas X. Fang,et al.  Projection micro-stereolithography using digital micro-mirror dynamic mask , 2005 .