Long-Term Effects of Cochlear Implants in Children

OBJECTIVE: Since 1987, when the use of multichannel cochlear implants was initiated in children, candidacy has expanded; many thousands of children have received these devices, and results have revealed a wide range of performance. However, few long-term studies exist on a large population of these children. There have been concerns expressed that cochlear implant function might degrade over time, that devices and electrodes might migrate and extrude in the growing child, or that there might even be a deleterious effect of long-term stimulation of the cochlear nerve. The purpose of this study was to explore the long-term effects of implantation as a function of performance over time, reimplantation, and educational factors. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We studied 81 children who received implants at a major academic medical center and were followed for 5 to 13 years. RESULTS: Results revealed significant gains in speech perception, use of oral language, and ability to function in a mainstream environment. There was no decrease in performance over time and no significant incidence of device or electrode migration or extrusion, and device failure did not cause a deterioration in long-term outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Multichannel cochlear implants in children provide perception, linguistic, and educational advantages, which are not adversely affected by long-term electrical stimulation.

[1]  S. Waltzman,et al.  Long-term results of early cochlear implantation in congenitally and prelingually deafened children. , 1994, The American journal of otology.

[2]  S. Waltzman,et al.  Delayed Implantation in Congenitally Deaf Children and Adults , 2002, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[3]  S. Waltzman,et al.  Cochlear implantation in children younger than 2 years old. , 1998, The American journal of otology.

[4]  J Bamford,et al.  The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children. , 1979, British journal of audiology.

[5]  S. Waltzman,et al.  Use of a multichannel cochlear implant in the congenitally and prelingually deaf population , 1992, The Laryngoscope.

[6]  C. Lykins,et al.  The comparative strength of laryngeal fracture fixation. , 1998, American journal of otolaryngology.

[7]  G. Woodworth,et al.  Results of multichannel cochlear implants in congenital and acquired prelingual deafness in children: five-year follow-up. , 1994, The American journal of otology.

[8]  B J Gantz,et al.  Performance over time of congenitally deaf and postlingually deafened children using a multichannel cochlear implant. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[9]  F. R. Miller,et al.  Managing the aspirating patient. , 1994, American journal of otolaryngology.

[10]  S. Waltzman,et al.  Performance of multiply handicapped children using cochlear implants. , 2000, The American journal of otology.

[11]  R C Dowell,et al.  Perceptual Abilities of Children with the Nucleus 22‐Channel Cochlear Implant , 1991, Ear and hearing.