How political candidates use Twitter and the impact on votes

This study investigates the content characteristics of Twitter during an election campaign, and the relationship between candidates’ style of online campaigning (i.e., politically personalized and interactive communication) and electoral support for those candidates. Thereby, it provides a better understanding of the linkage between the use of Twitter by candidates and effects on preferential votes. Two data sources are used to examine this relationship: first, a quantitative computer-assisted as well as a manual content analysis of tweets posted by political candidates during the Dutch national elections of 2010 (N = 40,957) and second, a dataset containing the number of votes for electable political candidates during that period. The findings show that using Twitter has positive consequences for political candidates. Candidates who used Twitter during the course of the campaign received more votes than those who did not, and using Twitter in an interactive way had a positive impact as well.

[1]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[2]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Information and Expression in a Digital Age , 2005, Commun. Res..

[3]  John H. Parmelee,et al.  Politics and the Twitter Revolution: How Tweets Influence the Relationship between Political Leaders and the Public , 2011 .

[4]  Jay G. Blumler,et al.  THE NEW MEDIA AND OUR POLITICAL COMMUNICATION DISCONTENTS: DEMOCRATIZING CYBERSPACE , 2001 .

[5]  C. Gunawardena,et al.  Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer‐mediated conferencing environment , 1997 .

[6]  J. Golbeck,et al.  Twitter use by the U.S. Congress , 2010 .

[7]  Isabell M. Welpe,et al.  Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment , 2010, ICWSM.

[8]  R. Andeweg,et al.  Demoted leaders and exiled candidates: Disentangling party and person in the voter’s mind , 2010 .

[9]  Tamara A. Small.  WHAT THE HASHTAG? , 2011 .

[10]  T. Postmes,et al.  Social Cues and Impression Formation in CMC , 2003 .

[11]  Kevin Arceneaux,et al.  Identifying the Persuasive Effects of Presidential Advertising , 2007 .

[12]  Yuping Liu,et al.  What is Interactivity and is it Always Such a Good Thing? Implications of Definition, Person, and Situation for the Influence of Interactivity on Advertising Effectiveness , 2002 .

[13]  Michael A. Xenos,et al.  Effects of Campaign-to-User and Text-Based Interactivity in Political Candidate Campaign Web sites , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[14]  K. Kenski,et al.  Connections Between Internet Use and Political Efficacy, Knowledge, and Participation , 2006 .

[15]  D. Fortin,et al.  Interactivity and vividness effects on social presence and involvement with a web-based advertisement , 2005 .

[16]  Jennifer Stromer-Galley,et al.  Citizen Perceptions of Online Interactivity and Implications for Political Campaign Communication , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[17]  Jan Kleinnijenhuis,et al.  Issues and Personalities in German and Dutch Television News , 2001 .

[18]  Soo Youn Oh,et al.  To Personalize or Depersonalize? When and How Politicians' Personalized Tweets Affect the Public's Reactions , 2012 .

[19]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[20]  Eva Johanna Schweitzer,et al.  Informing, engaging, mobilizing or interacting: Searching for a European model of web campaigning , 2011 .

[21]  Bram Wauters,et al.  Explaining the number of preferential votes for women in an open-list PR system: An investigation of the 2003 federal elections in Flanders (Belgium) , 2010 .

[22]  Eun-Ju Lee,et al.  Are They Talking to Me? Cognitive and Affective Effects of Interactivity in Politicians' Twitter Communication , 2012, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[23]  Dave D'Alessio,et al.  Use of the World Wide Web in the 1996 US Election , 1997 .

[24]  Chapman Rackaway,et al.  Trickle-Down Technology? The Use of Computing and Network Technology in State Legislative Campaigns , 2007 .

[25]  James N. Druckman,et al.  The Power of Television Images: The First Kennedy-Nixon Debate Revisited , 2003, The Journal of Politics.

[26]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[27]  James L. Perry,et al.  Do Campaign Web Sites Really Matter in Electoral Civic Engagement? , 2008 .

[28]  Kevin M. Wagner,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article the Journal of Legislative Studies Electronic Grassroots: Does Online Campaigning Work? , 2022 .

[29]  J. Tedesco.  Examining Internet Interactivity Effects on Young Adult Political Information Efficacy , 2007 .

[30]  Shelley Boulianne.  Does Internet Use Affect Engagement? A Meta-Analysis of Research , 2009 .

[31]  Gregory D. Saxton,et al.  Engaging Stakeholders Through Twitter: How Nonprofit Organizations Are Getting More Out of 140 Characters or Less , 2010, ArXiv.

[32]  R. Gibson,et al.  Do Online Election Campaigns Win Votes? The 2007 Australian “YouTube” Election , 2011 .

[33]  Martin Tanis,et al.  UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Cues to identity in CMC: the impact on person perception and subsequent interaction outcomes , 2007 .

[34]  R. Gibson,et al.  Does Cyber‐Campaigning Win Votes? Online Communication in the 2004 Australian Election , 2005 .

[35]  SHYAM SUNDAR,et al.  Explicating Web Site Interactivity , 2003, Commun. Res..

[36]  Michaela Maier,et al.  Personalization of Politics A Critical Review and Agenda for Research , 2010 .

[37]  Rens Vliegenthart,et al.  Getting closer: The effects of personalized and interactive online political communication , 2013 .

[38]  L. van Zoonen,et al.  The Personal in Political Television Biographies , 2010 .

[39]  Song-In Wang,et al.  Political Use of the Internet, Political Attitudes and Political Participation , 2007 .

[40]  Kristen D. Landreville,et al.  Evolution of Online Campaigning: Increasing Interactivity in Candidate Web Sites and Blogs Through Text and Technical Features , 2006 .

[41]  M. Kaase.  Is There Personalization in Politics? Candidates and Voting Behavior in Germany , 1994 .

[42]  S. Rafaeli,et al.  Assessing interactivity in computer-mediated research , 2009 .

[43]  Tamir Sheafer,et al.  The Personalization(s) of Politics: Israel, 1949–2003 , 2007 .

[44]  R. Vliegenthart,et al.  Is het de moeite waard? De karakteristieken en effectiviteit van partijwebsites in de campagne voor de Nederlandse gemeenteraadsverkiezingen van 2010 , 2010 .

[45]  Sonja Utz,et al.  The (Potential) Benefits of Campaigning via Social Network Sites , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[46]  Marta Cantijoch,et al.  2010 may not have marked the first ‘internet election’, but digital platforms are of ever increasing importance in political campaigning , 2011 .

[47]  I. McAllister.  The Personalization of Politics , 2007 .

[48]  S. Rosenberg,et al.  The Image and the Vote: The Effect of Candidate Presentation on Jfbter Preference , 1986 .