Syntactic reconstruction and reanalysis, semantic dead ends, and prefrontal cortex

The left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) is crucially has been found to be involved in syntactic processing of various kinds. This study investigates the cortical effects of two types of syntactic processes: (i) Reconstruction in ellipsis (recovery of left-out material given by context, More people have been to Paris than [...] to Oslo), using pseudo-elliptical structures ('dead ends') as control (More people have been to Paris than I have). (ii) Reanalysis in the face of structural ambiguity in syntactic 'garden paths', where the parser initially assigns an incorrect structure and is forced to reanalyze. Reanalysis and reconstruction require additional syntactic processing and were predicted to increase activation in areas otherwise involved in structural computation: LIFG (BA 44,45), premotor BA 6, and posterior temporal BA 21,22. This was borne out. The results showed an interaction effect of the types of construction in all three areas reflecting syntactic processing.

[1]  J. Fuster.  Cortex and mind : unifying cognition , 2003 .

[2]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  The 'Good Enough' Approach to Language Comprehension , 2007, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[3]  M. Honda,et al.  The role of rostral Brodmann area 6 in mental-operation tasks: an integrative neuroimaging approach. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  Ken Ramshøj Christensen.  Interfaces, syntactic movement, and neural activation: A new perspective on the implementation of language in the brain , 2008, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[5]  Jason Merchant,et al.  The syntax of silence : sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis , 2001 .

[6]  Paul M. Matthews,et al.  Left Inferior Prefrontal Cortex Activity Reflects Inhibitory Rather Than Facilitatory Priming , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  J. Trueswell,et al.  Cognitive control and parsing: Reexamining the role of Broca’s area in sentence comprehension , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[8]  M. Just,et al.  Brain Activation Modulated by Sentence Comprehension , 1996, Science.

[9]  W. Grodd,et al.  The speaking brain: a tutorial introduction to fMRI experiments in the production of speech, prosody and syntax , 2002, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[10]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Who did what to whom? The neural basis of argument hierarchies during language comprehension , 2005, NeuroImage.

[11]  Bart Geurts,et al.  Monotonicity and Processing Load , 2005, J. Semant..

[12]  A. Dale,et al.  Distinct Patterns of Neural Modulation during the Processing of Conceptual and Syntactic Anomalies , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  D. Swinney,et al.  Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  Marcel Adam Just,et al.  Ambiguity in the brain: what brain imaging reveals about the processing of syntactically ambiguous sentences. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  Robert Lindenberg,et al.  “Broca’s area” as a collective term? , 2007, Brain and Language.

[16]  James Douglas Saddy,et al.  Language Processing by Dynamical Systems , 2004, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[17]  L. Aravind,et al.  Integration of Word Meaning and World Knowledge in Language Comprehension , 2022 .

[18]  Arild Hestvik,et al.  Charting the time-course of VP-ellipsis sentence comprehension: Evidence for an initial and independent structural analysis. , 2003, Journal of memory and language.

[19]  Yosef Grodzinsky,et al.  Neural correlates of syntactic movement: converging evidence from two fMRI experiments , 2004, NeuroImage.

[20]  Kyle Johnson,et al.  What VP Ellipsis Can Do, and What it Can't, but not Why * , 2008 .

[21]  T Inui,et al.  A functional MRI analysis of comprehension processes of Japanese sentences , 1998, Neuroreport.

[22]  A. A. Wijers,et al.  Activations of “motor” and other non-language structures during sentence comprehension , 2004, Brain and Language.

[23]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets , 2003, NeuroImage.

[24]  Bradley L. Pritchett.  Grammatical Competence and Parsing Performance , 1992 .

[25]  P. Hagoort.  On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  A. Friederici.  Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  The P600 as an indicator of syntactic ambiguity , 2002, Cognition.

[28]  Myung-Kwan Park,et al.  The interaction between movement and ellipsis in the comparative construction in English , 2001 .

[29]  Ken Ramshøj Christensen.  Negative and affirmative sentences increase activation in different areas in the brain , 2009, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[30]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  Resolution of quantifier scope ambiguities , 1993, Cognition.

[31]  Manabu Honda,et al.  Functional segregation of the inferior frontal gyrus for syntactic processes: A functional magnetic-resonance imaging study , 2008, Neuroscience Research.

[32]  K. Kiehl,et al.  Error processing and the rostral anterior cingulate: an event-related fMRI study. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[33]  Martin Everaert,et al.  The Blackwell Companion to Syntax , 2006 .

[34]  Dimitris Natsopoulos.  A verbal illusion in two languages , 1985 .

[35]  The emergence of the unmarked: language specific functions of Broca´s area , 2005 .

[36]  C. Fiebach,et al.  Revisiting the role of Broca's area in sentence processing: Syntactic integration versus syntactic working memory , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[37]  D. Yves von Cramon,et al.  A Blueprint for Target Motion: fMRI Reveals Perceived Sequential Complexity to Modulate Premotor Cortex , 2002, NeuroImage.

[38]  S. Bookheimer,et al.  Form and Content Dissociating Syntax and Semantics in Sentence Comprehension , 1999, Neuron.

[39]  Joseph E. Aoun,et al.  Scope and constituency , 1989 .

[40]  J. Jonides,et al.  Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. , 1999, Science.

[41]  K Christianson,et al.  Misinterpretations of Garden-Path Sentences: Implications for Models of Sentence Processing and Reanalysis , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[42]  A. Owen,et al.  Prefrontal cortical involvement in verbal encoding strategies , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[43]  W. Hinzen.  Mind Design and Minimal Syntax , 2006 .

[44]  Juan Uriagereka,et al.  Measuring Language , 2004, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[45]  F. Rösler,et al.  Brain Activation Modulated by the Comprehension of Normal and Pseudo-word Sentences of Different Processing Demands: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[46]  Joseph A Maldjian,et al.  Precentral gyrus discrepancy in electronic versions of the Talairach atlas , 2004, NeuroImage.

[47]  A. Raymer,et al.  Broca's Area , 2003 .

[48]  A. A. Wijers,et al.  Localizing components of a complex task: sentence processing and working memory , 1998, Neuroreport.

[49]  D. V. Cramon,et al.  Functional–anatomical concepts of human premotor cortex: evidence from fMRI and PET studies , 2003, NeuroImage.

[50]  Sharlene D. Newman,et al.  Differential effects of syntactic and semantic processing on the subregions of Broca's area. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[51]  M. Corballis.  Laterality and human evolution. , 1989, Psychological review.

[52]  P C Wason,et al.  A Verbal Illusion , 1979, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[53]  James Myers,et al.  Syntactic Judgment Experiments , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[54]  C. Fiebach,et al.  Neural Correlates of Syntactic Ambiguity in Sentence Comprehension for Low and High Span Readers , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[55]  Mario Montalbetti,et al.  After binding : on the interpretation of pronouns , 1984 .

[56]  L. Stowe,et al.  Rethinking the neurological basis of language , 2005 .

[57]  Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky,et al.  Word order and Broca’s region: Evidence for a supra-syntactic perspective , 2009, Brain and Language.

[58]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  Processing linguistic complexity and grammaticality in the left frontal cortex. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[59]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Shallow Processing and Underspecification , 2006 .

[60]  Adrian M Owen,et al.  A common prefrontal-parietal network for mnemonic and mathematical recoding strategies within working memory. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[61]  J. Fuster.  Cortex and Mind , 2002 .

[62]  Neil Smith.  Language, Frogs and Savants: More Linguistic Problems, Puzzles and Polemics , 2005 .

[63]  N. Alpert,et al.  Localization of Syntactic Comprehension by Positron Emission Tomography , 1996, Brain and Language.

[64]  A. Sanford,et al.  Depth of processing in language comprehension: not noticing the evidence , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[65]  J. Decety,et al.  Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta‐analysis , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[66]  T. Hendler,et al.  The Neural Reality of Syntactic Transformations , 2003, Psychological science.

[67]  Chris Collins,et al.  The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory , 2001 .

[68]  S. Bookheimer.  Functional MRI of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. , 2002, Annual review of neuroscience.

[69]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  Reanalysis in sentence processing , 1998 .

[70]  D. Bickerton.  Language evolution: A brief guide for linguists , 2007 .