Future GHG emissions more efficiently controlled by land‐use policies than by bioenergy sustainability criteria

The EU Renewable Energy Directive (RED) targets, implemented to achieve climate change mitigation, affect the level of agricultural production in the EU and in the rest of the world. This article presents an impact assessment of increased biomass supply under different sustainability constraints on land use and resulting total GHG emissions at global and EU level. We apply GLOBIOM, a global partial equilibrium model integrating the agricultural, livestock, bioenergy and forestry sectors based on geographically explicit modeling of supply under prescribed demand. According to the model, global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from agriculture and land-use change (LUC) are anticipated to rise significantly up to 2030 due to various drivers (among others: GDP and population, diet shifts, and also bioenergy demand) despite basic sustainability criteria implemented by the RED (Reference scenario). Applying additional criteria, mainly protecting biodiversity outside the EU, overall GHG emissions can be reduced by 5% in 2030 compared to the Reference. Deforestation area decreases in this scenario slightly due to exclusion of high biodiversity forests but also due to increasing demand for energy wood that makes forests more valuable. If, however, in addition, deforestation is prevented through effective land-use policies, global GHG emissions can be reduced by 20% (compared to the Reference scenario). We conclude that sustainability criteria applied to biofuel production and imports only, do not mitigate potential negative impacts on total GHG emissions effectively. Unsustainable biomass production in sectors not covered by the bioenergy criteria can be best avoided by targeting deforestation and biodiversity loss directly. (c) 2013 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons,Ltd

[1]  P. Ciais,et al.  A synthesis of carbon dioxide emissions from fossil-fuel combustion , 2012 .

[2]  M. Gusti,et al.  Projection of the future EU forest CO2 sink as affected by recent bioenergy policies using two advanced forest management models , 2012 .

[3]  Jacinto F. Fabiosa,et al.  Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change , 2008, Science.

[4]  P. Verburg,et al.  Impact assessment of the European biofuel directive on land use and biodiversity. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[5]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Rapid growth in CO2 emissions after the 2008-2009 global financial crisis , 2011 .

[6]  E. Schmid,et al.  Global land-use implications of first and second generation biofuel targets , 2011 .

[7]  Ian McCallum,et al.  Predicting the deforestation-trend under different carbon-prices , 2006, Carbon balance and management.

[8]  P. Ciais,et al.  Reconstruction and attribution of the carbon sink of European forests between 1950 and 2000 , 2011 .

[9]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Large‐scale bioenergy from additional harvest of forest biomass is neither sustainable nor greenhouse gas neutral , 2012 .

[10]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  A Large and Persistent Carbon Sink in the World’s Forests , 2011, Science.

[11]  A. Tabeau,et al.  Impact of EU biofuel policies on world agricultural production and land use , 2011 .

[12]  T. Ricketts,et al.  Confronting a biome crisis: global disparities of habitat loss and protection , 2004 .

[13]  S. Polasky,et al.  Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt , 2008, Science.

[14]  T. Beringer,et al.  Additional CO2 emissions from land use change — Forest conservation as a precondition for sustainable production of second generation bioenergy , 2012 .