Retroperitonoscopic nephrectomy and nephrouretrectomy in children and adolescents: analysis of a single-center experience.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Retroperitonoscopic nephrectomy in children was considered by some authors to be the final gold standard in children. Hence, we reviewed our data focusing on the safety and efficacy of the procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS In the period from November 2005 till February 2010, 35 patients were operated by a single surgeon (the first author); patients comprised 18 boys and 17 girls, with a mean age of 7.5 years (range: 1-19 years). In all patients, the retroperitonoscopic approach was used with the use of only three trocars, one 10-mm optic trocar and two 5-mm trocars. The retroperitoneal space was established either by direct insufflation into the Gerota fascia, which is grasped and opened under vision, or using a balloon dilator to widen the space and then incising the Gerota fascia under control of the optic trocar, then control of the pedicle is performed, and the specimen is extracted from the same optic trocar. RESULTS The mean operative time is 75 minutes (range: 45-120 minutes). Nineteen nephrectomies and 16 nephrouretrectomies were performed. Blood loss was minimal, blood transfusion was not given, and conversion to open surgery was not needed. There were no intraoperative complications, and only one postoperative hematoma resolved spontaneously. The mean hospital stay was 2 days (1-3 days). CONCLUSION Retroperitonoscopic nephrectomy in children is safe and feasible. Blood loss is minimal, hospital stay is very short, and complications are minimal. It has excellent cosmetic outcome.

[1]  S. Cascio,et al.  Open versus prone retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy in children: a comparative study. , 2011, Journal of pediatric urology.

[2]  H. Chandran,et al.  Laparoscopic nephrectomy for xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis in childhood: the way forward. , 2008, Journal of pediatric urology.

[3]  I. Mushtaq,et al.  An initial experience of 100 paediatric laparoscopic nephrectomies with transperitoneal or posterior prone retroperitoneoscopic approach , 2007, Pediatric Surgery International.

[4]  I. Mushtaq,et al.  Bilateral synchronous posterior prone retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy with simultaneous peritoneal dialysis: a new management for end‐stage renal disease in children , 2007, BJU international.

[5]  Y. Aigrain,et al.  Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy in children: at last the gold standard? , 2006, Journal of pediatric urology.

[6]  M. Bianchi,et al.  Retroperitoneoscopic renal surgery in children: our experience. , 2006, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[7]  G. Mackinlay,et al.  Endoscopic nephrectomy in children: is retro the way forward? , 2006, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[8]  Richard S. Lee,et al.  Symptomatic refluxing distal ureteral stumps after nephroureterectomy and heminephroureterectomy. What should we do? , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[9]  S. Halachmi,et al.  Successful Subcapsular Laparoscopic Nephrectomy in a Child with Xanthogranulomatous Pyelonephritis , 2002 .

[10]  P. Borzi A comparison of the lateral and posterior retroperitoneoscopic approach for complete and partial nephroureterectomy in children , 2001, BJU international.

[11]  A. Hemal,et al.  Transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for giant hydronephrosis. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[12]  J. Pope,et al.  Natural history of refluxing distal ureteral stumps after nephrectomy and partial ureterectomy for vesicoureteral reflux. , 1998, The Journal of urology.