Auditory acclimatization and hearing aids: late auditory evoked potentials and speech recognition following unilateral and bilateral amplification.

The aim of this study was to investigate changes in central auditory processing following unilateral and bilateral hearing aid fitting using a combination of physiological and behavioral measures: late auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) and speech recognition in noise, respectively. The hypothesis was that for fitted ears, the ERP amplitude would increase over time following hearing aid fitting in parallel with improvement in aided speech recognition. The N1 and P2 ERPs were recorded to 500 and 3000 Hz tones presented at 65, 75, and 85 dB sound pressure level to either the left or right ear. New unilateral and new bilateral hearing aid users were tested at the time of first fitting and after 12 weeks hearing aid use. A control group of long-term hearing aid users was tested over the same time frame. No significant changes in the ERP were observed for any group. There was a statistically significant 2% improvement in aided speech recognition over time for all groups, although this was consistent with a general test-retest effect. This study does not support the existence of an acclimatization effect observable in late ERPs following 12 weeks' hearing aid use.

[1]  R A Bentler,et al.  Does hearing aid benefit increase over time? , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[3]  K. Crowley,et al.  A review of the evidence for P2 being an independent component process: age, sleep and modality , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  M P Haggard,et al.  The four alternative auditory feature test (FAAF)--linguistic and psychometric properties of the material with normative data in noise. , 1987, British journal of audiology.

[5]  S. Kalluri,et al.  Brainstem processing following unilateral and bilateral hearing-aid amplification , 2013, Neuroreport.

[6]  T. Picton,et al.  The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[7]  S. Luck.  An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique , 2005 .

[8]  Larry E Humes,et al.  An examination of changes in hearing-aid performance and benefit in the elderly over a 3-year period of hearing-aid use. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[9]  K S Taylor,et al.  Self‐perceived and Audiometric Evaluations of Hearing Aid Benefit in the Elderly , 1993, Ear and hearing.

[10]  S. Debener,et al.  Late auditory evoked potentials asymmetry revisited , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  R M Cox,et al.  Maturation of hearing aid benefit: objective and subjective measurements. , 1992, Ear and hearing.

[12]  S. Gelfand,et al.  Late-onset auditory deprivation: effects of monaural versus binaural hearing aids. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Ruth A. Bentler,et al.  Longitudinal Study of Hearing Aid Effectiveness. II , 1993 .

[14]  Helen J Simon,et al.  Acclimatization in wide dynamic range multichannel compression and linear amplification hearing aids. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[15]  Lidia W. Lee,et al.  Evidence of acclimatization in persons with severe-to-profound hearing loss. , 2003, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[16]  Richard S. Tyler,et al.  Cochlear Implantation: Relationships with Research on Auditory Deprivation and Acclimatization , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[17]  H. Tiitinen,et al.  Visual short-term memory load affects sensory processing of irrelevant sounds in human auditory cortex. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[18]  J. Jerger,et al.  Dichotic Listening, Event‐Related Potentials, and Interhemispheric Transfer in the Elderly , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[19]  S. Gelfand,et al.  Long-term effects of monaural, binaural and no amplification in subjects with bilateral hearing loss. , 1987, Scandinavian audiology.

[20]  R A Bentler,et al.  Longitudinal study of hearing aid effectiveness. I: Objective measures. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[21]  S Gatehouse,et al.  Apparent auditory deprivation effects of late onset: the role of presentation level. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Piers Dawes,et al.  Acclimatization to Hearing Aids , 2014, Ear and hearing.

[23]  R A Bentler,et al.  Longitudinal study of hearing aid effectiveness. II: Subjective measures. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[24]  C V Palmer,et al.  The functionally and physiologically plastic adult auditory system. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  M. Hyde,et al.  The N1 response and its applications. , 1997, Audiology & neuro-otology.

[26]  R M Cox,et al.  Report of the Eriksholm Workshop on auditory deprivation and acclimatization. , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[27]  R. Cox,et al.  Benefit acclimatization in elderly hearing aid users. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[28]  Kevin J Munro,et al.  The effect of speech presentation level on measurement of auditory acclimatization to amplified speech. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  S Gatehouse,et al.  The time course and magnitude of perceptual acclimatization to frequency responses: evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Jennifer Paulovicks McCullagh.  An investigation of central auditory nervous system plasticity following amplification , 2009 .

[31]  Asymmetry in the auditory brainstem response following experience of monaural amplification , 2007, Neuroreport.

[32]  S Gatehouse,et al.  Role of perceptual acclimatization in the selection of frequency responses for hearing aids. , 1993, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[33]  D. Bodmer,et al.  Late auditory evoked potentials in elderly long-term hearing-aid users with unilateral or bilateral fittings , 2011, Hearing Research.

[34]  Kevin J Munro,et al.  Reorganization of the Adult Auditory System: Perceptual and Physiological Evidence From Monaural Fitting of Hearing Aids , 2008, Trends in amplification.

[35]  Larry E Humes,et al.  Changes in hearing-aid benefit following 1 or 2 years of hearing-aid use by older adults. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[37]  L. Collet,et al.  The auditory acclimatization effect in sensorineural hearing-impaired listeners: Evidence for functional plasticity , 2005, Hearing Research.

[38]  D. W. Robinson,et al.  Long-term repeatability of the pure-tone hearing threshold and its relation to noise exposure. , 1991, British journal of audiology.

[39]  C W Turner,et al.  The Time Course of Hearing Aid Benefit , 1997, Ear and hearing.

[40]  R M Cox,et al.  A Review of Past Research on Changes in Hearing Aid Benefit over Time , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[41]  Marion Burgess,et al.  Reverberation times in British living rooms , 1985 .