Analysis of Trabecular Bone Structure with Multidetector Spiral Computed Tomography in a Simulated Soft-Tissue Environment

We investigated the influence of soft tissue (ST) on image quality by high-resolution multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scans and assessed the effect of surrounding ST on the quantification of trabecular bone structure. Eight bone cores obtained from human proximal femoral heads discarded during hip replacement surgery were scanned with micro-computed tomography (μCT) as well as with MDCT both without (w/o) and with (w) simulated surrounding ST, where a phantom imitated a human torso. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured in all scans. Apparent trabecular bone structure parameters were calculated and compared to similar parameters obtained in coregistered sections of the μCT scans. Residual errors were calculated as root-mean-square (RMS) errors relative to the μCT measurements. Compared to μCT results, trabecular structure parameters were overestimated by MDCT both w and w/o ST. SNR and CNR were significantly higher in the scans w/o ST. Significant correlations between μCT and MDCT results were found for bone fraction (r = 0.90 w/o ST, r = 0.84 w ST), trabecular number, and separation. RMS ranged from 10% to 15% for MDCT w/o ST and from 10% to 17% for MDCT w ST. Only bone fraction showed significantly different RMS and correlations for scans w/o vs. w ST (P < 0.05). This study showed that MDCT is able to visualize trabecular bone structure in an in vivo-like setting at skeletal sites within the torso such as the proximal femur. Even though ST scatter compromises image quality substantially, the major characteristics of the trabecular network can still be appreciated and quantified.

[1]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Assessment of trabecular structure using high resolution CT images and texture analysis. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[2]  Volker Kuhn,et al.  Bone Strength at Clinically Relevant Sites Displays Substantial Heterogeneity and Is Best Predicted From Site‐Specific Bone Densitometry , 2002, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[3]  W. Kalender,et al.  Accuracy limits for the determination of cortical width and density: the influence of object size and CT imaging parameters. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  S. Richard,et al.  A simple, direct method for x-ray scatter estimation and correction in digital radiography and cone-beam CT. , 2005, Medical physics.

[5]  L. Melton,et al.  Medical Expenditures for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Fractures in the United States in 1995: Report from the National Osteoporosis Foundation , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[6]  R. Mann,et al.  Characterization of microstructural anisotropy in orthotropic materials using a second rank tensor , 1984 .

[7]  Hajime Orimo,et al.  Multi‐Detector Row CT Imaging of Vertebral Microstructure for Evaluation of Fracture Risk , 2005, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[8]  M S Calvo,et al.  Prevalence of Low Femoral Bone Density in Older U.S. Adults from NHANES III , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[9]  Sharmila Majumdar,et al.  Local differences in the trabecular bone structure of the proximal femur depicted with high-spatial-resolution MR imaging and multisection CT. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[10]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Volumetric spatial decomposition of trabecular bone into rods and plates--a new method for local bone morphometry. , 2006, Bone.

[11]  M. Drezner,et al.  Bone histomorphometry: Standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units: Report of the asbmr histomorphometry nomenclature committee , 1987, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[12]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Impact of spatial resolution on the prediction of trabecular architecture parameters. , 1998, Bone.

[13]  X. Marchandise,et al.  Computed Tomography Image Analysis of the Calcaneus in Male Osteoporosis , 2002, Osteoporosis International.

[14]  A. Tosteson,et al.  Incidence and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis‐Related Fractures in the United States, 2005–2025 , 2007, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[15]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of trabecular bone structure in the distal radius: Relationship with X-ray tomographic microscopy and biomechanics , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[16]  Michael Grasruck,et al.  Ultra-high resolution flat-panel volume CT: fundamental principles, design architecture, and system characterization , 2006, European Radiology.

[17]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  Cancellous bone structure: analysis of high-resolution CT images with the run-length method. , 1991, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[18]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Trabecular Bone Structure Obtained From Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography of the Calcaneus Predicts Osteoporotic Vertebral Deformities , 2005, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[19]  S Prohaska,et al.  Stereological measures of trabecular bone structure: comparison of 3D micro computed tomography with 2D histological sections in human proximal tibial bone biopsies , 2005, Journal of microscopy.

[20]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Structural Analysis of Trabecular Bone of the Proximal Femur Using Multislice Computed Tomography: A Comparison with Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry for Predicting Biomechanical Strength In Vitro , 2006, Calcified Tissue International.

[21]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  A microtomographic system for the nondestructive evaluation of bone architecture , 2006, Calcified Tissue International.

[22]  S. Majumdar,et al.  In Vivo High Resolution MRI of the Calcaneus: Differences in Trabecular Structure in Osteoporosis Patients , 1998, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[23]  F Eckstein,et al.  [Multislice-CT for structure analysis of trabecular bone - a comparison with micro-CT and biomechanical strength]. , 2004, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[24]  S. Majumdar,et al.  High-resolution MRI vs multislice spiral CT: Which technique depicts the trabecular bone structure best? , 2003, European Radiology.

[25]  Thomas Flohr Technische Grundlagen und Anwendungen der Mehrschicht-CT , 1999 .

[26]  K Stierstorfer,et al.  Performance evaluation of a 64-slice CT system with z-flying focal spot. , 2004, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[27]  Roland Krug,et al.  Feasibility of in vivo structural analysis of high-resolution magnetic resonance images of the proximal femur , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[28]  Sharmila Majumdar,et al.  Trabecular bone structure of the calcaneus: comparison of MR imaging at 3.0 and 1.5 T with micro-CT as the standard of reference. , 2006, Radiology.

[29]  X Ouyang,et al.  A Comparative Study of Trabecular Bone Properties in the Spine and Femur Using High Resolution MRI and CT , 1998, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[30]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  Morphometric analysis of human bone biopsies: a quantitative structural comparison of histological sections and micro-computed tomography. , 1998, Bone.

[31]  S Schaller,et al.  [The technical bases and uses of multi-slice CT]. , 1999, Der Radiologe.

[32]  A. Hermann,et al.  Site of Osteodensitometry in Perimenopausal Women: Correlation and Limits of Agreement Between Anatomic Regions , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[33]  S. A. Jackson,et al.  The Influence of Osteoporotic Fractures on Health-Related Quality of Life in Community-Dwelling Men and Women across Canada , 2001, Osteoporosis International.

[34]  H. Genant,et al.  Image-Based Assessment of Spinal Trabecular Bone Structure from High-Resolution CT Images , 1998, Osteoporosis International.