Development of Creativity of Engineering Students: A Cause for Concern?

This research paper describes the study of how instruction in the use of an idea generation heuristic may differently influence the creativity performance of first year, third year, and postgraduate students from the same institution. Innovation and creativity are increasingly becoming important skills for engineers, but some students suffer design fixation and are unable to effectively produce solution ideas. An experiment was devised whereby students received instruction in use of an idea generation heuristic, and then spent time generating ideas to a real-world engineering-related problem. Results showed that first year students performed better than third year students, who in turn performed better than postgraduate students. These outcomes suggest that if idea generation heuristics are to be introduced to curriculum, they may be most effective if introduced in first year of study when students may be more willing to accept and utilise such creativity techniques.

[1]  Iouri Belski,et al.  Do we succeed in developing problem-solving skills - The engineering students' perspective , 2011 .

[2]  Pamela McCauley,et al.  An Investigation of the State of Creativity and Critical Thinking in Engineering Undergraduates , 2017 .

[3]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  On The Relationship Between Idea-Quantity and Idea-Quality During Ideation , 2008 .

[4]  P. McLeod,et al.  Ethnic Diversity and Creativity in Small Groups , 1996 .

[5]  Katja Hölttä-Otto,et al.  The Effect of Prototyping and Critical Feedback on Fixation in Engineering Design , 2011, CogSci.

[6]  John Baer The Importance of Domain-Specific Expertise in Creativity , 2015 .

[7]  Gaetano Cascini,et al.  Engineering Creativity: The Influence of General Knowledge and Thinking Heuristics , 2018, Advances in Systematic Creativity.

[8]  Alfredo Muñoz Adánez Does quantity generate quality? Testing the fundamental principle of brainstorming. , 2005, The Spanish journal of psychology.

[9]  Michael Diehl,et al.  Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. , 1991 .

[10]  Elizabeth Marquis,et al.  A present absence: undergraduate course outlines and the development of student creativity across disciplines , 2017 .

[11]  Catherine T. Amelink,et al.  Exploring differences in perceived innovative thinking skills between first year and upperclassmen engineers , 2016, 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[12]  I. Belski,et al.  Can simple ideation techniques influence idea generation: comparing results from Australia, Czech Republic, Finland and Russian Federation , 2015 .

[13]  A. Cropley Defining and measuring creativity: Are creativity tests worth using? , 2000 .

[14]  David H. Cropley,et al.  Promoting creativity and innovation in engineering education. , 2015 .

[15]  I. Belski Engineering creativity - how to measure it? , 2017 .

[16]  Shanna R. Daly,et al.  Teaching Creativity in Engineering Courses , 2014 .

[17]  Lamies J. Nazzal Engineering Creativity: Differences in Creative Problem Solving Stages Across Domains , 2015 .

[18]  John Merrill,et al.  Assessing General Creativity and Creative Engineering Design in First Year Engineering Students , 2009 .

[19]  Iouri Belski,et al.  Australian electrical engineering curricula and development of creativity skills: how do we rate? , 2017 .

[20]  John T. E. Richardson Measures of effect size , 1996 .

[21]  Carolyn Conner Seepersad,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of the Innovation Capabilities of Undergraduate Engineering Students , 2012 .

[22]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  The Expertise Reversal Effect , 2003 .

[23]  Gad Saad,et al.  Individualism–collectivism and the quantity versus quality dimensions of individual and group creative performance , 2015 .

[24]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Idea Generation and the Quality of the Best Idea , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[25]  Iouri Belski,et al.  Engaging engineering students in creative problem solving tasks: How does it influence future performance? , 2016 .