Spatial updating during locomotion does not eliminate viewpoint-dependent visual object processing

Two experiments were conducted to investigate whether locomotion to a novel test view would eliminate viewpoint costs in visual object processing. Participants performed a sequential matching task for object identity or object handedness, using novel 3-D objects displayed in a head-mounted display. To change the test view of the object, the orientation of the object in 3-D space and the test position of the observer were manipulated independently. Participants were more accurate when the test view was the same as the learned view than when the views were different no matter whether the view change of the object was 50° or 90°. With 50° rotations, participants were more accurate at novel test views caused by participants’ locomotion (object stationary) than caused by object rotation (observer stationary) but this difference disappeared when the view change was 90°. These results indicate that facilitation of spatial updating during locomotion occurs within a limited range of viewpoints, but that such facilitation does not eliminate viewpoint costs in visual object processing.

[1]  Fan Xiao,et al.  ImageTclAR: A Blended Script and Compiled Code Development System For Augmented Reality , 2004 .

[2]  Ranxiao Frances Wang,et al.  Object recognition is mediated by extraretinal information , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[4]  T. McNamara,et al.  Viewpoint Dependence in Scene Recognition , 1997 .

[5]  I. M. Harris,et al.  Dissociating viewpoint costs in mental rotation and object recognition , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  M. Tarr,et al.  Testing conditions for viewpoint invariance in object recognition. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Neil Burgess,et al.  Orientational manoeuvres in the dark: dissociating allocentric and egocentric influences on spatial memory , 2004, Cognition.

[8]  I. Biederman,et al.  Recognizing depth-rotated objects: evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Martin J. Farrell,et al.  Mental Rotation and the Automatic Updating of Body-Centered Spatial Relationships , 1998 .

[10]  M. Tarr Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  Weimin Mou,et al.  Frames of reference in mobile augmented reality displays. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[12]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  BOLD Activity during Mental Rotation and Viewpoint-Dependent Object Recognition , 2002, Neuron.

[13]  W. Hayward,et al.  Viewpoint Dependence and Object Discriminability , 2000, Psychological science.

[14]  J. Rieser Access to knowledge of spatial structure at novel points of observation. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  Ranxiao Frances Wang,et al.  Perceiving Real-World Viewpoint Changes , 1998 .

[16]  Ranxiao Frances Wang,et al.  Active and passive scene recognition across views , 1999, Cognition.

[17]  Timothy P. McNamara,et al.  Systems of Spatial Reference in Human Memory , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Three-dimensional object recognition is viewpoint dependent , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Orientation specificity and spatial updating of memories for layouts. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  Irvin Rock,et al.  Orientation and form , 1974 .

[21]  Weimin Mou,et al.  Allocentric and egocentric updating of spatial memories. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.