Stochastic properties of cat auditory nerve responses to electric and acoustic stimuli and application to intensity discrimination.

Statistical properties of electrically stimulated (ES) and acoustically stimulated (AS) auditory nerve fiber responses were assessed in undeafened and short-term deafened cats, and a detection theory approach was used to determine fibers' abilities to signal intensity changes. ES responses differed from AS responses in several ways. Rate-level functions were an order of magnitude steeper, and discharge rate normally saturated at the stimulus pulse rate. Dynamic ranges were typically 1-4 dB for 200 pps signals, as compared with 15-30 dB for AS signals at CF, and they increased with pulse rate without improving threshold or changing absolute rate-level function slopes. For both ES and AS responses, variability of spike counts elicited by repeated trials increased with level in accord with Poisson-process predictions until the discharge rate exceeded 20-40 spikes/s. AS variability continued increasing monotonically at higher discharge rates, but more slowly. In contrast, maximum ES variability was usually attained at 100 spikes/s, and at higher discharge rates variability reached a plateau that was either maintained or decreased slightly until discharge rate approached the stimulus pulse rate. Variability then decreased to zero as each pulse elicited a spike. Increasing pulse rate did not substantially affect variability for rates up to 800 pps; rather, higher pulse rates simply extended the plateau region. Spike count variability was unusually high for some ES fibers. This was traced to response nonstationarities that stemmed from two sources, namely level-dependent fluctuations in excitability that occurred at 1-3 s intervals and, for responses to high-rate, high-intensity signals, fatigue that arose when fibers discharged at their maximum possible rates. Intensity discrimination performance was assessed using spike count as the decision variable in a simulated 2IFC task. Neurometric functions (percent correct versus intensity difference) were obtained at several levels of the standard (I), and the intensity difference (delta I) necessary for 70% correct responses was estimated. AS Weber fractions (10 log delta I/I) averaged +0.2 dB (delta IdB = 3.1 dB) for 50 ms tones at CF. ES Weber fractions averaged -12.8 dB (delta IdB = 0.23 dB) for 50 ms, 200 pps signals, and performance was approximately constant between 100 and 1000 pps. Intensity discrimination by single cells in ES conditions paralleled human psychophysical performance for similar signals. High ES sensitivity to intensity changes arose primarily from steeper rate-level functions and secondarily from reduced spike count variability.

[1]  P H Ward,et al.  Tumor Recurrence within Myocutaneous Flaps , 1987, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[2]  Rainer Hartmann,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the cat cochlea. Discharge pattern of single auditory fibres , 1984 .

[3]  A R Palmer,et al.  Intensity coding in low-frequency auditory-nerve fibers of the guinea pig. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Raimond L. Winslow,et al.  A computational model for rate-level functions from cat auditory-nerve fibers , 1989, Hearing Research.

[5]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  The Neurophysiological Eects of Simulated Auditory Prosthesis Stimulation , 1997 .

[6]  Verveen Aa Axon diameter and fluctuation in excitability. , 1962 .

[7]  L. A. Westerman,et al.  Rapid and short-term adaptation in auditory nerve responses , 1984, Hearing Research.

[8]  Blake S. Wilson,et al.  Speech processors for cochlear prostheses , 1988, Proc. IEEE.

[9]  M Florentine,et al.  Level discrimination of tones as a function of duration. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  G S Donaldson,et al.  Psychometric functions and temporal integration in electric hearing. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Edwin Charles Moxon,et al.  Neural and mechanical responses to electric stimulation of the cat's inner ear , 1971 .

[12]  G S Donaldson,et al.  Intensity discrimination as a function of stimulus level with electric stimulation. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  A. A. Verveen Axon diameter and fluctuation in excitability. , 1962, Acta morphologica Neerlando-Scandinavica.

[14]  Raimond L Winslow,et al.  Single-tone intensity discrimination based on auditory-nerve rate responses in backgrounds of quiet, noise, and with stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle , 1988, Hearing Research.

[15]  D H Johnson,et al.  The transmission of signals by auditory-nerve fiber discharge patterns. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  D G Pelli,et al.  Probe tone thresholds in the auditory nerve measured by two-interval forced-choice procedures. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  M. White,et al.  A stochastic model of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve: pulse-train response , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  H. Spoendlin,et al.  Analysis of the human auditory nerve , 1989, Hearing Research.

[19]  Robert K Shepherd,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status , 1997, Hearing Research.

[20]  P. Gray Conditional probability analyses of the spike activity of single neurons. , 1967, Biophysical journal.

[21]  C. E. Molnar,et al.  Stimulus and recovery dependence of cat cochlear nerve fiber spike discharge probability. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Robert K. Shepherd,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve III. Response initiation sites and temporal fine structure , 2000, Hearing Research.

[23]  Rainer Klinke,et al.  Response Characteristics of Nerve Fibers to Patterned Electrical Stimulation , 1990 .

[24]  Malvin C. Teich,et al.  Pulse‐number distribution for the neural spike train in the cat’s auditory nerve , 1985 .

[25]  Christopher J. Plack,et al.  Loudness perception and intensity coding , 1995 .

[26]  M. Liberman,et al.  Morphometry of intracellularly labeled neurons of the auditory nerve: Correlations with functional properties , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[27]  Bertrand Delgutte,et al.  Phase-locking of auditory-nerve discharges to sinusoidal electric stimulation of the cochlea , 1992, Hearing Research.

[28]  N. Viemeister,et al.  Auditory intensity discrimination at high frequencies in the presence of noise. , 1983, Science.

[29]  E D Young,et al.  Rate responses of auditory nerve fibers to tones in noise near masked threshold. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  M. Liberman Morphological differences among radial afferent fibers in the cat cochlea: An electron-microscopic study of serial sections , 1980, Hearing Research.

[31]  Patricia A. Leake,et al.  Cochlear pathology of long term neomycin induced deafness in cats , 1988, Hearing Research.

[32]  Eric Javel,et al.  Acoustic and Electrical Encoding of Temporal Information , 1990 .

[33]  Bertrand Delgutte,et al.  Peripheral Auditory Processing of Speech Information: Implications from a Physiological Study of Intensity Discrimination , 1987 .

[34]  Graeme M. Clark,et al.  Responses of Cat Auditory Nerve Fibers to Biphasic Electrical Current Pulses , 1987 .

[35]  Graeme M. Clark,et al.  Profound hearing loss in the cat following the single co-administration of kanamycin and ethacrynic acid , 1993, Hearing Research.

[36]  M. Liberman The cochlear frequency map for the cat: labeling auditory-nerve fibers of known characteristic frequency. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  M C Teich,et al.  Pulse-number distribution for the neural spike train in the cat's auditory nerve. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  M. Sachs,et al.  Rate versus level functions for auditory-nerve fibers in cats: tone-burst stimuli. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.