Web Accessibility for the Blind: Corporate Social Responsibility  or Litigation Avoidance?

On September 5, 2006, a legal precedent was set for web accessibility. Federal judge Marilyn Patel sustained discrimination claims by the National Federation for the Blind against Target Corporation. She established that retailers must make their websites accessible to the blind under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Past research has indicated that eCommerce retailers have largely ignored W3C guidelines for making their sites accessible. This study examines web accessibility motivation under the lens of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). A model is developed linking accessibility behavior to a retailer's propensity to engage in CSR activities, the types of products and services sold, complexity of visual web content, and perceived threat of litigation resulting from an inaccessible site. Based on the model recommendations are suggested for future research. Thirty-two websites of the largest online retailers with a physical presence were analyzed using IBM's aDesigner accessibility tool for the three years before and one year since the commencement of the Target litigation. Results suggest that accessibility of sites has showed significant improvement since the Target case began.

[1]  Helen Petrie,et al.  The relationship between accessibility and usability of websites , 2007, CHI.

[2]  Judy Brewer,et al.  Web accessibility highlights and trends , 2003, W4A '04.

[3]  Jonathan Lazar,et al.  Improving web accessibility: a study of webmaster perceptions , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  Philip L. Cochran,et al.  The Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance Model , 1985 .

[5]  M. Friedman The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits , 2007 .

[6]  Rebecca Matson,et al.  Barriers to use: usability and content accessibility on the Web's most popular sites , 2000, CUU '00.

[7]  David Sloan Two cultures? The disconnect between the web standards movement and research-based web design guidelines for older people , 2006 .

[8]  Giorgio Brajnik,et al.  Web Accessibility Testing: When the Method Is the Culprit , 2006, ICCHP.

[9]  R. P. Chakrabarty,et al.  SURVEY OF INCOME AND PROGRAM PARTICIPATION , 1990 .

[10]  Bambang Parmanto,et al.  Accessibility of Internet websites through time , 2003, ASSETS.

[11]  Jennifer Mankoff,et al.  Is your web page accessible?: a comparative study of methods for assessing web page accessibility for the blind , 2005, CHI.

[12]  Gregg C. Vanderheiden,et al.  Web content accessibility guidelines 1.0 , 2001, INTR.

[13]  S. Neely-Barnes,et al.  Predicting impact of childhood disability on families: results from the 1995 National Health Interview Survey Disability Supplement. , 2004, Mental retardation.

[14]  Hironobu Takagi,et al.  Proposing new metrics to evaluate web usability for the blind , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[15]  S. H. Long,et al.  SURVEY OF INCOME AND PROGRAM PARTICIPATION , 1990 .

[16]  M. Clarkson A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance , 1995 .

[17]  Richard E. Ladner,et al.  Accessmonkey: a collaborative scripting framework for web users and developers , 2007, W4A '07.

[18]  D. Siegel,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of the Strategic Use of Corporate Social Responsibility , 2006 .

[19]  Junji Maeda,et al.  Accessibility designer: visualizing usability for the blind , 2004, Assets '04.

[20]  Mary Frances Theofanos,et al.  Bridging the gap: between accessibility and usability , 2003, INTR.