Inspiration and fixation: Questions, methods, findings, and challenges

Research into inspiration and fixation has produced a complex web of questions, methods, and findings, making it difficult to know what has already been investigated and learnt, and what to investigate next and how. To address this, we review the literature, focussing on 25 studies that adopt a similar experimental approach. This reveals 14 manipulated variables, relating to properties of the inspiration source and features of the design process. However, whilst these studies follow a similar approach, when scrutinised and compared, they show great variety in the methods used and the results obtained. We discuss this diversity, offering a methodological critique of inspiration and fixation research and providing recommendations for how future studies might be conducted and reported.

[1]  Rosario Vidal,et al.  Effectiveness of the means of expression in creative problem-solving in design groups , 2004 .

[2]  Lassi A. Liikkanen,et al.  Exposure Effects in Design Idea Generation: Unconscious Conformity or a Product of Sampling Probability? , 2006 .

[3]  K. Dugosh,et al.  Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Lassi A. Liikkanen,et al.  Inspiring design idea generation: insights from a memory-search perspective , 2010 .

[5]  Seda Yilmaz,et al.  Cognitive heuristics in design: Instructional strategies to increase creativity in idea generation , 2010, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[6]  Claudia Eckert,et al.  REFERENCES TO PAST DESIGNS , 2005 .

[7]  H. Christiaans.  Creativity as a Design Criterion , 2002 .

[8]  Bruce Hanington,et al.  Methods in the Making: A Perspective on the State of Human Research in Design , 2003, Design Issues.

[9]  Maria C. Yang,et al.  PROMPT VERSUS PROBLEM: HELPING STUDENTS LEARN TO FRAME PROBLEMS AND THINK CREATIVELY , 2007 .

[10]  Mark T. Keane.  On Retrieving Analogues When Solving Problems , 1987 .

[11]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Assembly bonus effect or typical group performance ? a comment on Michaelsen, Watson, and Black (1989) , 1992 .

[12]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  Expertise and the use of visual analogy: implications for design education , 1999 .

[13]  Christian D. Schunn,et al.  Physical Design Tools Support and Hinder Innovative Engineering Design , 2011 .

[14]  Matti Perttula,et al.  The idea exposure paradigm in design idea generation , 2007 .

[15]  David W. Rosen,et al.  The effects of biological examples in idea generation , 2010 .

[16]  K. Duncker,et al.  On problem-solving , 1945 .

[17]  Donald W. Taylor,et al.  DOES GROUP PARTICIPATION WHEN USING BRAINSTORMING FACILITATE OR INHIBIT CREATIVE THINKING , 1958 .

[18]  Scarlett R. Miller,et al.  The Impact of Example Modality and Physical Interactions on Design Creativity , 2014 .

[19]  Zhang Lujun.  Design fixation and solution quality under exposure to example solution , 2011, 2011 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Computing, Control and Industrial Engineering.

[20]  Julie S. Linsey,et al.  The effects of time and incubation on design concept generation , 2014 .

[21]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  The role of timing and analogical similarity in the stimulation of idea generation in design , 2008 .

[22]  Gina Brown,et al.  Blind in one eye: How psychological ownership of ideas affects the types of suggestions people adopt , 2012 .

[23]  M. E. Shaw.  A comparison of individuals and small groups in the rational solution of complex problems. , 1932 .

[24]  Krzysztof Z. Gajos,et al.  Providing Timely Examples Improves the Quantity and Quality of Generated Ideas , 2015, Creativity & Cognition.

[25]  D. Gentner,et al.  Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. , 1997 .

[26]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Modality and representation in analogy , 2008, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[27]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  The effect of representation of triggers on design outcomes , 2008, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[28]  Lassi A. Liikkanen,et al.  Structural Tendencies and Exposure Effects in Design Idea Generation , 2006 .

[29]  Wolfgang Stroebe,et al.  How the Group Affects the Mind: A Cognitive Model of Idea Generation in Groups , 2006, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[30]  H. Arkes,et al.  The Psychology of Sunk Cost , 1985 .

[31]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  Inspiring design ideas with texts , 2011 .

[32]  Maria C. Yang,et al.  Fundamental studies in Design-by-Analogy: A focus on domain-knowledge experts and applications to transactional design problems , 2014 .

[33]  K. Dugosh,et al.  Cognitive and social comparison processes in brainstorming , 2005 .

[34]  G. Wallas.  The art of thought , 1926 .

[35]  Peter Lloyd,et al.  Does experience enable or impede the design process , 1999 .

[36]  Marine Agogué,et al.  The impact of age and training on creativity: A design-theory approach to study fixation effects , 2014 .

[37]  S. Gilbert,et al.  Exploring the neurological basis of design cognition using brain imaging: some preliminary results , 2009 .

[38]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  Fixation or inspiration? A meta-analytic review of the role of examples on design processes , 2015 .

[39]  Julie S. Linsey,et al.  Design Fixation in Physical Modeling: An Investigation on the Role of Sunk Cost , 2011 .

[40]  E. Salas,et al.  Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. , 1991 .

[41]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[42]  Nathaniel Crilly,et al.  Fixation and creativity in concept development: the attitudes and practices of expert designers , 2015 .

[43]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[44]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Incubation and the persistence of fixation in problem solving. , 1991, The American journal of psychology.

[45]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  THE MEANING OF "NEAR" AND "FAR": THE IMPACT OF STRUCTURING DESIGN DATABASES AND THE EFFECT OF DISTANCE OF ANALOGY ON DESIGN OUTPUT , 2012 .

[46]  Melissa A. B. Smith,et al.  Shifting the Focus: An Objective Look at Design Fixation , 2013, HCI.

[47]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance , 2006 .

[48]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  On the benefits and pitfalls of analogies for innovative design : Ideation performance based on analogical distance, commonness, and modality of examples , 2011 .

[49]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  Assessing design creativity , 2011 .

[50]  J. Wiley.  Expertise as mental set: The effects of domain knowledge in creative problem solving , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[51]  Ruth Mugge,et al.  A new strategy to reduce design fixation: Presenting partial photographs to designers , 2014 .

[52]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  The Influence of Different Pictorial Representations during Idea Generation. , 2011 .

[53]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Analogical problem solving , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[54]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  Perspectives on design creativity and innovation research , 2013 .

[55]  J. L. Pierce,et al.  The State of Psychological Ownership: Integrating and Extending a Century of Research , 2003 .

[56]  John S. Gero,et al.  Design and other types of fixation , 1996 .

[57]  B. Nijstad,et al.  Cognitive stimulation and interference in groups: Exposure effects in an idea generation task , 2002 .

[58]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Generalized "satisfaction of search": adverse influences on dual-target search accuracy. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[59]  R. Weisberg,et al.  Following the wrong footsteps: fixation effects of pictorial examples in a design problem-solving task. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[60]  D. Dahl,et al.  The Influence and Value of Analogical Thinking during New Product Ideation , 2002 .

[61]  Robert J. Youmans,et al.  Design fixation: Classifications and modern methods of prevention , 2014, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[62]  Robert J. Youmans.  Design Fixation in the Wild: Design Environments and Their Influence on Fixation , 2011 .

[63]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Getting into and out of mental ruts: A theory of fixation, incubation, and insight. , 1995 .

[64]  Vimal Viswanathan,et al.  A study on the role of physical models in the mitigation of design fixation , 2014 .

[65]  Robert J. Youmans,et al.  The effects of physical prototyping and group work on the reduction of design fixation , 2011 .

[66]  Jeffrey V. Nickerson,et al.  A fix for fixation? Rerepresenting and abstracting as creative processes in the design of information systems , 2010, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[67]  L. Anolli,et al.  Accessing Source Information in Analogical Problem-Solving , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[68]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  A Study of Design Fixation, Its Mitigation and Perception in Engineering Design Faculty , 2010 .

[69]  Hokyoung Ryu,et al.  A Design Thinking Rationality Framework: Framing and Solving Design Problems in Early Concept Generation , 2014, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[70]  Ronald A. Finke,et al.  Imagery, Creativity, and Emergent Structure , 1996, Consciousness and Cognition.

[71]  J. LeFevre,et al.  Do Written Instructions Need Examples , 1986 .

[72]  T. B. Ward.  Structured Imagination: the Role of Category Structure in Exemplar Generation , 1994, Cognitive Psychology.

[73]  David Radcliffe,et al.  Impact of CAD tools on creative problem solving in engineering design , 2009, Comput. Aided Des..

[74]  Katja Hölttä-Otto,et al.  The Effect of Prototyping and Critical Feedback on Fixation in Engineering Design , 2011, CogSci.

[75]  A. Luchins.  Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of Einstellung. , 1942 .

[76]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Schema induction and analogical transfer , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[77]  F. Brodbeck,et al.  Effects of individual versus mixed individual and group experience in rule induction on group member learning and group performance , 2000 .

[78]  Bo T. Christensen,et al.  The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and preinventive structure: the case of engineering design , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[79]  Peter Lloyd,et al.  Influences on Solution Search Processes in Design Organisations , 1999 .

[80]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  FIND YOUR INSPIRATION: EXPLORING DIFFERENT LEVELS OF ABSTRACTION IN TEXTUAL STIMULI , 2012 .

[81]  N. Maier.  Reasoning in humans. II. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness. , 1931 .

[82]  Monte M. Page,et al.  4 – Demand Compliance in Laboratory Experiments , 1981 .

[83]  K. Kotovsky,et al.  The influence of open goals on the acquisition of problem-relevant information. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.