Time pressure disrupts level-2, but not level-1, visual perspective calculation: A process-dissociation analysis

Reasoning about other people's mental states has long been assumed to require active deliberation. Yet, evidence from indirect measures suggests that adults and children commonly display behavior indicative of having incidentally calculated both what other agents see (level-1 perspective taking) and how they see it (level-2 perspective taking). Here, we investigated the efficiency of such perspective calculation in adults. In four experiments using indirect measures of visual perspective taking, we imposed time pressure to constrain processing opportunity, and we used process-dissociation analyses to isolate perspective calculation as the process of focal interest. Results revealed that time pressure weakened level-2, but not level-1, perspective calculation-a pattern that was not evident in error-rate analyses. These findings suggest that perspective calculation may operate more efficiently in level-1 than in level-2 perspective taking. They also highlight the utility of the process-dissociation framework for unmasking processes that otherwise may go under-detected in behavior-level analyses.

[1]  J. Flavell,et al.  Young children's knowledge about visual perception: Further evidence for the Level 1–Level 2 distinction. , 1981 .

[2]  Y. Trope,et al.  Dual-process theories of the social mind , 2014 .

[3]  C. Heyes,et al.  Avatars and arrows: implicit mentalizing or domain-general processing? , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  V. Slaughter,et al.  Current evidence for automatic Theory of Mind processing in adults , 2017, Cognition.

[5]  Dana Samson,et al.  Similarities and differences in visual and spatial perspective-taking processes , 2013, Cognition.

[6]  J. Braithwaite,et al.  Seeing it their way: evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Ian A Apperly,et al.  Egocentrism and automatic perspective taking in children and adults. , 2012, Child development.

[8]  Jeffrey W. Sherman,et al.  Process models require process measures , 2016 .

[9]  J. Bargh Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. , 1989 .

[10]  Daniel T. Smith,et al.  Do humans spontaneously take the perspective of others? , 2016, Acta psychologica.

[11]  Ori Friedman,et al.  Core mechanisms in ‘theory of mind’ , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  Paul E. Dux,et al.  What do we know about implicit false-belief tracking? , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  Ian A Apperly,et al.  Direct and indirect measures of Level-2 perspective-taking in children and adults. , 2012, The British journal of developmental psychology.

[14]  I. Király,et al.  Evidence for spontaneous level-2 perspective taking in adults , 2016, Consciousness and Cognition.

[15]  Klaus Kessler,et al.  The embodied nature of spatial perspective taking: Embodied transformation versus sensorimotor interference , 2010, Cognition.

[16]  I. Király,et al.  Level‐2 perspectives computed quickly and spontaneously: Evidence from eight‐ to 9.5‐year‐old children , 2017, The British journal of developmental psychology.

[17]  U. Simonsohn Small Telescopes , 2014, Psychological science.

[18]  M. Inzlicht,et al.  Implicit moral evaluations: A multinomial modeling approach , 2017, Cognition.

[19]  D. Balota,et al.  Conceptualizing control in social cognition: how executive functioning modulates the expression of automatic stereotyping. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  M. Gardner,et al.  Implicit Mentalising during Level-1 Visual Perspective-Taking Indicated by Dissociation with Attention Orienting , 2018, Vision.

[21]  Lewis J. Baker,et al.  The extent of default visual perspective taking in complex layouts. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Dana Samson,et al.  The use of embodied self-rotation for visual and spatial perspective-taking , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[23]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Prejudice and perception: the role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Rebecca Lam,et al.  Cognitive Load Disrupts Implicit Theory-of-Mind Processing , 2012, Psychological science.

[25]  J. Levy,et al.  Inclined to see it your way: Do altercentric intrusion effects in visual perspective taking reflect an intrinsically social process? , 2015, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[26]  J. Bargh,et al.  Individual construct accessibility, person memory, and the recall-judgment link: The case of information overload. , 1985 .

[27]  Austin J. Simpson,et al.  Anxiety impairs spontaneous perspective calculation: Evidence from a level-1 visual perspective-taking task , 2016, Cognition.

[28]  Christopher J. Wilson,et al.  Attentional interference is modulated by salience not sentience. , 2017, Acta psychologica.

[29]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[30]  A. Ledgerwood New developments in research methods , 2018 .

[31]  B. Keysar,et al.  When do speakers take into account common ground? , 1996, Cognition.

[32]  Mário B. Ferreira,et al.  Automatic and controlled components of judgment and decision making. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  J. Bargh The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. , 1994 .

[34]  Austin J. Simpson,et al.  Dissociating processes underlying level-1 visual perspective taking in adults , 2017, Cognition.

[35]  L. Jacoby A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory , 1991 .

[36]  Michael D. Byrne,et al.  Cognitive Architecture , 2003 .

[37]  Hannes Rakoczy,et al.  Symposium on S. Butterfill and I. Apperly, "How to Construct a Minimal Theory of Mind" , 2013 .

[38]  S. Langton I Don’t See It Your Way: The Dot Perspective Task Does Not Gauge Spontaneous Perspective Taking , 2018, Vision.

[39]  Joo-Seok Hyun,et al.  Visual working memory as the substrate for mental rotation. , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[40]  Dana Samson,et al.  Executive function is necessary for perspective selection, not Level-1 visual perspective calculation: Evidence from a dual-task study of adults , 2010, Cognition.

[41]  Dana Samson,et al.  Unintentional perspective-taking calculates whether something is seen, but not how it is seen , 2016, Cognition.

[42]  D. Samson,et al.  I’ve got your number: Spontaneous perspective-taking in an interactive task , 2016, Cognition.

[43]  K. C. Klauer,et al.  Dissociating contingency awareness and conditioned attitudes: evidence of contingency-unaware evaluative conditioning. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[44]  M. Gardner,et al.  ‘Spontaneous’ visual perspective-taking mediated by attention orienting that is voluntary and not reflexive , 2018, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[45]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  False-belief understanding in infants , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  D. Amodio,et al.  Proactive Control of Implicit Bias: A Theoretical Model and Implications for Behavior Change , 2018, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  D. Lakens Performing High-Powered Studies Efficiently with Sequential Analyses , 2014 .

[48]  Ian A Apperly,et al.  Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states? , 2009, Psychological review.

[49]  H. Rakoczy,et al.  Is Implicit Theory of Mind a Real and Robust Phenomenon? Results From a Systematic Replication Study , 2018, Psychological science.

[50]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Best laid plans: Effects of goals on accessibility bias and cognitive control in race-based misperceptions of weapons , 2002 .

[51]  Ulf Böckenholt,et al.  Single Paper Meta-Analysis: Benefits For Study Summary, Theory-Testing, and Replicability , 2017 .

[52]  J. Hohwy,et al.  Seeing It Both Ways: Using a Double-Cuing Task to Investigate the Role of Spatial Cuing in Level-1 Visual Perspective-Taking , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  Peter Carruthers Mindreading in adults: evaluating two-systems views , 2015, Synthese.

[54]  N. Epley,et al.  Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[55]  Andrew P. Yonelinas,et al.  Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: measuring recollection , 1993 .

[56]  Bertram Gawronski,et al.  Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: a process dissociation approach. , 2013, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[57]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring ☆ , 1983 .

[58]  J. Sherman,et al.  Disentangling stereotype activation and stereotype application in the stereotype misperception task. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[59]  H. Wimmer,et al.  Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception , 1983, Cognition.

[60]  J. Hietanen,et al.  From gaze cueing to perspective taking: Revisiting the claim that we automatically compute where or what other people are looking at , 2015, Visual cognition.

[61]  G. Bodenhausen,et al.  The associative—Propositional evaluation model: Operating principles and operating conditions of evaluation. , 2014 .

[62]  P. Carruthers Two Systems for Mindreading? , 2016 .

[63]  D L DeMets,et al.  Computations for group sequential boundaries using the Lan-DeMets spending function method. , 2000, Controlled clinical trials.

[64]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[65]  R. Monk,et al.  Executive function underlies both perspective selection and calculation in Level-1 visual perspective taking , 2018, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[66]  F. Thoemmes,et al.  Continuously Cumulating Meta-Analysis and Replicability , 2014, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[67]  C. Becchio,et al.  Altercentric interference in level 1 visual perspective taking reflects the ascription of mental states, not submentalizing. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[68]  Randy J. McCarthy,et al.  The interplay of controlled and automatic processing in the expression of spontaneously inferred traits: A PDP analysis. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[69]  P. Barrouillet,et al.  Time and cognitive load in working memory. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[70]  Renée Baillargeon,et al.  Early False-Belief Understanding , 2017, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[71]  Andrew R Todd,et al.  The Empathy Impulse: A Multinomial Model of Intentional and Unintentional Empathy for Pain , 2017, Emotion.

[72]  Rebecca Neel,et al.  Does Seeing Faces of Young Black Boys Facilitate the Identification of Threatening Stimuli? , 2016, Psychological science.

[73]  Peter C. Hansen,et al.  Seeing It My Way or Your Way: Frontoparietal Brain Areas Sustain Viewpoint-independent Perspective Selection Processes , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[74]  C. Heyes Submentalizing: I Am Not Really Reading Your Mind , 2014, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[75]  A. Greenwald PSS 7210 . 1177 / 1745691611434210 GreenwaldMethod – Theory Synergy There Is Nothing So Theoretical as a Good Method , 2012 .

[76]  H. Rakoczy,et al.  Cognitive Architecture of Belief Reasoning in Children and Adults: A Primer on the Two-Systems Account , 2016 .

[77]  Klaus Kessler,et al.  The Two Forms of Visuo-Spatial Perspective Taking are Differently Embodied and Subserve Different Spatial Prepositions , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[78]  A. D’Ausilio,et al.  Domain-specific and domain-general processes in social perception – A complementary approach , 2015, Consciousness and Cognition.

[79]  Ralph Hertwig,et al.  Time and moral judgment , 2011, Cognition.

[80]  Bethany Lassetter,et al.  Racial bias in implicit danger associations generalizes to older male targets , 2018, PloS one.

[81]  Austin J. Simpson,et al.  Intergroup visual perspective-taking: Shared group membership impairs self-perspective inhibition but may facilitate perspective calculation , 2017, Cognition.

[82]  G. Bodenhausen,et al.  Evaluative Conditioning From the Perspective of the Associative-Propositional Evaluation Model , 2018, Social Psychological Bulletin.

[83]  Jane R. Conway,et al.  Submentalizing or Mentalizing in a Level 1 Perspective-Taking Task: A Cloak and Goggles Test , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[84]  J. J. Higgins,et al.  The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only anova procedures , 2011, CHI.