Measuring effectiveness in Focus on Form versus Focus on Meaning

So far empirical studies have shown that explicit Focus-on-Form (FonF) methods are more effective than implicit Focus-on-Meaning (FonM) methods (Norris & Ortega, 2000). However, many studies fail to address the notion of ‘effectiveness’ and the tests used usually favor the explicitly taught FonF groups in that some explicitly taught ‘rule’ is targeted. This paper argues that the effectiveness of FonF versus FonM methods will depend on how effectiveness is defined and operationalized and when it is measured. We compared the oral fluency of two groups of high school students after two years of instruction. One group was taught French with a FonF method, and the other with a FonM method called AIM (Maxwell, 2004). The free speech data of the two groups were scored for general proficiency (Study 1) and analyzed for grammatical accuracy (Study 2). The study shows that after two years of instruction the FonM scored higher than the FonF on oral proficiency and the same on grammatical accuracy.

[1]  R. Ellis.  Introduction: Investigating Form‐Focused Instruction , 2001 .

[2]  B. D. Schwartz.  On Explicit and Negative Data Effecting and Affecting Competence and Linguistic Behavior , 1993, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[3]  Daan Jans,et al.  A comparative study on the effects of AIM on oral language production skills , 2011 .

[4]  J. Hulstijn.  Not all grammar rules are equal: giving grammar instruction its proper place in foreign language teaching , 1995 .

[5]  Michael H. Long.  Focus on Form: A Design Feature in Language Teaching Methodology , 1991 .

[6]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  Input and Second Language Acquisition: The Roles of Frequency, Form, and Function Introduction to the Special Issue , 2009 .

[7]  Sible Andringa,et al.  Effect of explicit and implicit instruction on free written response task performance , 2011 .

[8]  M. Akakura,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of explicit instruction on implicit and explicit L2 knowledge , 2012 .

[9]  R. Ellis.  MEASURING IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT KNOWLEDGE OF A SECOND LANGUAGE: A Psychometric Study , 2005, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[10]  David B. Pillemer,et al.  Summing Up: The Science of Reviewing Research , 1984 .

[11]  J. Norris,et al.  Effectiveness of L2 Instruction: A Research Synthesis and Quantitative Meta‐analysis , 2000 .

[12]  Rosemary Erlam,et al.  The Effects of Deductive and Inductive Instruction on the Acquisition of Direct Object Pronouns in French as a Second Language , 2003 .