INCOG 2.0 Guidelines for Cognitive Rehabilitation Following Traumatic Brain Injury: Methods, Overview, and Principles

Introduction: Moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) results in complex cognitive sequelae. Despite hundreds of clinical trials in cognitive rehabilitation, the translation of these findings into clinical practice remains a challenge. Clinical practice guidelines are one solution. The objective of this initiative was to reconvene the international group of cognitive researchers and clinicians (known as INCOG) to develop INCOG 2.0: Guidelines for Cognitive Rehabilitation Following TBI. Methods: The guidelines adaptation and development cycle was used to update the recommendations and derive new ones. The team met virtually and reviewed the literature published since the original INCOG (2014) to update the recommendations and decision algorithms. The team then prioritized the recommendations for implementation and modified the audit tool accordingly to allow for the evaluation of adherence to best practices. Results: In total, the INCOG update contains 80 recommendations (25 level A, 15 level B, and 40 level C) of which 27 are new. Recommendations developed for posttraumatic amnesia, attention, memory, executive function and cognitive-communication are outlined in other articles, whereas this article focuses on the overarching principles of care for which there are 38 recommendations pertaining to: assessment (10 recommendations), principles of cognitive rehabilitation (6 recommendations), medications to enhance cognition (10 recommendations), teleassessment (5 recommendations), and telerehabilitation intervention (7 recommendations). One recommendation was supported by level A evidence, 7 by level B evidence, and all remaining recommendations were level C evidence. New to INCOG are recommendations for telehealth-delivered cognitive assessment and rehabilitation. Evidence-based clinical algorithms and audit tools for evaluating the state of current practice are also provided. Conclusions: Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation guided by these recommendations should be offered to individuals with TBI. Despite the advancements in TBI rehabilitation research, further high-quality studies are needed to better understand the role of cognitive rehabilitation in improving patient outcomes after TBI.

[1]  J. Ponsford,et al.  INCOG 2.0 Guidelines for Cognitive Rehabilitation Following Traumatic Brain Injury, Part IV: Cognitive-Communication and Social Cognition Disorders , 2023, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[2]  J. Ponsford,et al.  INCOG 2.0 Guidelines for Cognitive Rehabilitation Following Traumatic Brain Injury, Part V: Memory , 2023, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[3]  J. Ponsford,et al.  INCOG 2.0 Guidelines for Cognitive Rehabilitation Following Traumatic Brain Injury, Part II: Attention and Information Processing Speed , 2023, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[4]  J. Ponsford,et al.  INCOG 2.0 Guidelines for Cognitive Rehabilitation Following Traumatic Brain Injury, Part I: Posttraumatic Amnesia , 2023, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[5]  J. Ponsford,et al.  INCOG 2.0 Guidelines for Cognitive Rehabilitation Following Traumatic Brain Injury, Part III: Executive Functions , 2023, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[6]  J. Olver,et al.  Use of olanzapine to treat agitation in traumatic brain injury: a series of n-of-one trials. , 2022, Journal of neurotrauma.

[7]  H. Chiu,et al.  Comparative efficacy of prophylactic anticonvulsant drugs following traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2022, PloS one.

[8]  E. Cook,et al.  Convergent Validity of In-Person Assessment of Inpatients With Traumatic Brain Injury Using the Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone (BTACT) , 2021, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[9]  M. Hennessy,et al.  Optimizing and simplifying post-traumatic amnesia testing after moderate-severe traumatic brain injury despite common confounders in routine practice , 2020, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[10]  J. Ponsford,et al.  Assessment and management of patients in the acute stages of recovery following traumatic brain injury in adults- a world-wide survey. , 2020, Journal of neurotrauma.

[11]  J. Ponsford,et al.  Comparing the Westmead Posttraumatic Amnesia Scale, Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test, and Confusion Assessment Protocol as Measures of Acute Recovery Following Traumatic Brain Injury. , 2020, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[12]  C. Lazaridis,et al.  The role of amantadine in cognitive recovery early after traumatic brain injury: A systematic review , 2020, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[13]  E. Power,et al.  Improved Conversation Outcomes After Social Communication Skills Training for People With Traumatic Brain Injury and Their Communication Partners: A Clinical Trial Investigating In-Person and Telehealth Delivery. , 2020, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[14]  E. Power,et al.  A Clinical Trial Investigating Telehealth and In-Person Social Communication Skills Training for People With Traumatic Brain Injury: Participant-Reported Communication Outcomes , 2020, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[15]  Angela H. Ciccia,et al.  Evidence-based systematic review of cognitive rehabilitation, emotional, and family treatment studies for children with acquired brain injury literature: From 2006 to 2017 , 2020, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[16]  J. Ponsford,et al.  Outcome instruments in moderate-to-severe adult traumatic brain injury: recommendations for use in psychosocial research , 2019, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[17]  Timothy R. Smith,et al.  The Effectiveness of Antiepileptic Medications as Prophylaxis of Early Seizure in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury Compared with Placebo or No Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2019, World neurosurgery.

[18]  Ghazal Akhavan Masoumi,et al.  The Effect of Oral Administration of Amantadine on Neurological Outcome of Patients With Diffuse Axonal Injury in ICU , 2019, Journal of experimental neuroscience.

[19]  J. Ponsford,et al.  Efficacy and Harms of Pharmacological Interventions for Neurobehavioral Symptoms in Post-Traumatic Amnesia after Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review. , 2018, Journal of neurotrauma.

[20]  J. Ponsford,et al.  The relationship between agitation and impairments of orientation and memory during the PTA period after traumatic brain injury , 2018, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[21]  M. Taheri,et al.  The effects of amantadine on traumatic brain injury outcome: a double-blind, randomized, controlled, clinical trial , 2018, Brain injury.

[22]  Yelena G. Bodien,et al.  The Feasibility of Telephone-Administered Cognitive Testing in Individuals 1 and 2 Years after Inpatient Rehabilitation for Traumatic Brain Injury. , 2018, Journal of neurotrauma.

[23]  A. Belli,et al.  A systematic review of levetiracetam versus phenytoin in the prevention of late post-traumatic seizures and survey of UK neurosurgical prescribing practice of antiepileptic medication in acute traumatic brain injury , 2018, British journal of neurosurgery.

[24]  C. V. van Heugten,et al.  Searching for effective components of cognitive rehabilitation for children and adolescents with acquired brain injury: A systematic review , 2018, Brain injury.

[25]  Joshua D. Burks,et al.  Early and Late Posttraumatic Epilepsy in the Setting of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Meta-analysis and Review of Antiepileptic Management. , 2017, World neurosurgery.

[26]  M. Delgado-Rodríguez,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2017, Medicina intensiva.

[27]  T. Ownsworth,et al.  Efficacy of Telerehabilitation for Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review , 2017, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[28]  Krestina L. Amon,et al.  Interdisciplinary eHealth for the care of people living with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review , 2017, Brain injury.

[29]  Kevin W Eva,et al.  Advancing the literature on designing audit and feedback interventions: identifying theory-informed hypotheses , 2017, Implementation Science.

[30]  P. Klimo,et al.  Should Levetiracetam or Phenytoin Be Used for Posttraumatic Seizure Prophylaxis? A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-analysis. , 2016, Neurosurgery.

[31]  Xuefeng Wang,et al.  Levetiracetam Versus Phenytoin for Seizure Prophylaxis Following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2016, CNS Drugs.

[32]  Jun Shen,et al.  The safety and efficacy of levetiracetam versus phenytoin for seizure prophylaxis after traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2016, Brain injury.

[33]  Robert Teasell,et al.  INCOG Recommendations for Management of Cognition Following Traumatic Brain Injury, Part IV: Cognitive Communication , 2014, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[34]  J. Ponsford,et al.  INCOG Recommendations for Management of Cognition Following Traumatic Brain Injury, Part III: Executive Function and Self-Awareness , 2014, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[35]  J. Ponsford,et al.  INCOG Recommendations for Management of Cognition Following Traumatic Brain Injury, Part II: Attention and Information Processing Speed , 2014, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[36]  J. Ponsford,et al.  INCOG Recommendations for Management of Cognition Following Traumatic Brain Injury, Part I: Posttraumatic Amnesia/Delirium , 2014, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[37]  J. Ponsford,et al.  INCOG Guidelines for Cognitive Rehabilitation Following Traumatic Brain Injury: Methods and Overview , 2014, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[38]  J. Ponsford,et al.  Quality of Guidelines for Cognitive Rehabilitation Following Traumatic Brain Injury , 2014, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[39]  J. Ponsford,et al.  INCOG Recommendations for Management of Cognition Following Traumatic Brain Injury, Part V: Memory , 2014, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[40]  Jeremy M. Grimshaw,et al.  Growing Literature, Stagnant Science? Systematic Review, Meta-Regression and Cumulative Analysis of Audit and Feedback Interventions in Health Care , 2014, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[41]  N. Lannin,et al.  Telerehabilitation services for stroke. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[42]  Jane M. Young,et al.  Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[43]  John Whyte,et al.  Placebo-controlled trial of amantadine for severe traumatic brain injury. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[44]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[45]  Lorraine Smith,et al.  Management of Patients With Stroke: Rehabilitation, Prevention and Management of Complications, and Discharge Planning: a National Clinical Guideline , 2010 .

[46]  Ian D Graham,et al.  Evaluation and adaptation of clinical practice guidelines , 2005, Evidence-based nursing.

[47]  M. Ylvisaker,et al.  Practice guidelines for standardized assessment for persons with traumatic brain injury , 2005 .

[48]  A. Moseley,et al.  Development of a database of rehabilitation therapies for the psychological consequences of acquired brain impairment , 2004 .

[49]  G. Teasdale,et al.  Reliability of Ratings on the Glasgow Outcome Scales from In‐person and Telephone Structured Interviews , 2003, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[50]  B. Davies,et al.  Sources and models for moving research evidence into clinical practice. , 2002, Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN.

[51]  D. Ciliska,et al.  Resources to enhance evidence-based nursing practice. , 2001, AACN clinical issues.

[52]  R. Grol Successes and Failures in the Implementation of Evidence-Based Guidelines for Clinical Practice , 2001, Medical care.

[53]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines , 1999, BMJ.