Phrasing Effects in Comprehending PP Constructions

The role of prosodic phrasing in sentence comprehension was investigated by means of three different tasks, namely auditory word monitoring (Experiment 1), self-paced reading (Experiment 2) and cross-modal comparison (Experiment 3). In all three experiments a critical prosodic unit or frame comprising a determiner, a noun and a Prepositional Phrase (PP) was preceded or surrounded by two context prosodic units (frames) whose length was varied. The participants’ tendency to interpret the critical sequence as forming a single syntactic constituent (noun–complement interpretation of the PP) as opposed to two distinct syntactic constituents (verb–complement interpretation of the PP) was found to depend on the relative length of the critical and context prosodic units (frames). As a whole these results are consistent with the notion that phrasing effects occur in a retroactive way, after part of the utterance has been processed.

[1]  Donald Mitchell,et al.  Lexical guidance in human parsing: Locus and processing characteristics. , 1987 .

[2]  M. MacDonald,et al.  Pragmatic constraint on the interpretation of complex noun phrases in Spanish and English. , 1999 .

[3]  R. Job,et al.  AN INVESTIGATION OF LATE CLOSURE : THE ROLE OF SYNTAX, THEMATIC STRUCTURE,AND PRAGMATICS IN INITIAL AND FINAL INTERPRETATION , 1995 .

[4]  Alexandra Kinyon,et al.  Building a Treebank for French , 2000, LREC.

[5]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  The Concomitant Effects of Phrase Length and Informational Content in Sentence Comprehension , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[6]  R. Job,et al.  Some observations on the universality of the late-closure strategy , 1993 .

[7]  Vincenzo Lombardo,et al.  Cross-Linguistic Perspectives on Language Processing , 2001 .

[8]  Joël Pynte,et al.  Syntactic ambiguity resolution while reading in second and native languages. , 1997 .

[9]  Duane G. Watson,et al.  Making Sense of the Sense Unit Condition , 2004, Linguistic Inquiry.

[10]  J. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Intonational structure in Japanese and English , 1986, Phonology.

[11]  Janet Dean Fodor.  Psycholinguistics Cannot Escape Prosody , 2002 .

[12]  E. Gibson.  Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies , 1998, Cognition.

[13]  Pierre-Yves Le Meur,et al.  Elan Text-To-Speech : Un système multilingue de synthèse de la parole à partir du texte , 2001 .

[14]  Cécile Beauvillain,et al.  Calibration of an eye-movement system for use in reading , 1995 .

[15]  Merle Horne,et al.  Prosody: Theory and Experiment , 2000 .

[16]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints , 1995, Cognition.

[17]  E. Selkirk.  On derived domains in sentence phonology , 1986, Phonology.

[18]  F. Grosjean,et al.  Les structures de performance en français: caractérisation et prédiction , 1993 .

[19]  Gerry Altmann,et al.  Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives - Workshop Overview , 1989, AI Mag..

[20]  Janet Dean Fodor,et al.  Learning To Parse? , 1998 .

[21]  J. Pynte,et al.  ‘Romancing’ Syntactic Ambiguity: Why the French and the Italians don't See Eye to Eye , 2000 .

[22]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  Language processing in Spanish , 1997 .

[23]  Hubert Truckenbrodt,et al.  On the Relation between Syntactic Phrases and Phonological Phrases , 1999, Linguistic Inquiry.

[24]  Edward Gibson,et al.  Intonational phrasing and constituency in language production and comprehension , 2005 .

[25]  Daniel Hirst.  Detaching intonational phrases from syntactic structure , 1993 .

[26]  Matthew W. Crocker,et al.  Ambiguity Resolution in Sentence Processing: Evidence against Frequency-Based Accounts , 2000 .

[27]  Eva M. Fernández.  Bilingual Sentence Processing: Relative clause attachment in English and Spanish , 2003 .

[28]  Joël Pynte,et al.  Prosodic Breaks and Attachment Decisions in Sentence Parsing. , 1996 .

[29]  Robert E. Haussmann.  Tachistoscopic presentation and millisecond timing on the IBM PC/XT/AT and PS/2: A Turbo Pascal unit to provide general-purpose routines for CGA, Hercules, EGA, and VGA monitors , 1992 .

[30]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure , 1984 .

[31]  M. Coltheart.  Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading , 1987 .

[32]  J. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Japanese Tone Structure , 1988 .

[33]  Joël Pynte,et al.  Decoupling syntactic parsing from visual inspection: The case of relative clause attachment in French , 2000 .

[34]  James Paul Gee,et al.  Performance structures: A psycholinguistic and linguistic appraisal , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[35]  Ann Cutler,et al.  Prosody in the Comprehension of Spoken Language: A Literature Review , 1997, Language and speech.

[36]  Joël Pynte,et al.  Reading as a Perceptual Process , 2000 .

[37]  J. Pynte,et al.  Resolving Syntactic Ambiguities: Cross-Linguistic Differences? , 2000 .

[38]  Yuki Hirose,et al.  Resolving reanalysis ambiguity in Japanese relative clauses , 1999 .

[39]  J. Pynte,et al.  Evidence for Early Closure Attachment on First Pass Reading Times in French , 1997 .

[40]  Joel Pynte,et al.  The Role of Prosody in Semantic Interpretation , 1998 .