Incidence of new-onset left bundle branch block and predictors of new permanent pacemaker following transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the Portico™ valve†

OBJECTIVES To examine the incidence and timing of new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) and new permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using the repositionable, self-expanding Portico™ TAVI system (St. Jude Medical, St Paul, MN, USA). Clinical impact and periprocedural factors associated with new PPI were also assessed. METHODS A total of 198 high-risk patients without pre-existing pacemaker [83.1 ± 4.7 years, 77.3% women, mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) 5.8%] from the Pre-CE Mark Portico TAVI system study were prospectively analysed. Twelve-lead electrocardiographic and echocardiographic data were collected prior to, during and after the procedure. Clinical follow-up was performed at 1 year. RESULTS Transfemoral implantation of the Portico valve was associated with a new PPI rate of 15.2% at 30 days and 16.7% at 1 year. Overall, 53 of the 187 patients without pre-existing LBBB developed new-onset LBBB at 1 year (28.3%); 23 occurred during the procedure. At 30 days, new-onset LBBB spontaneously resolved in 61.0% of patients. New-onset LBBB post-TAVI was not associated with new PPI (P = 0.64); 8 of the 53 patients required new PPI. Multivariable regression analyses revealed pre-existing right bundle branch block (P = 0.004) and aortic annulus diameter (P = 0.001) as independent predictors of new PPI. New PPI at discharge (n = 29) was not associated with increased freedom from all-cause (odds ratio 92.7%, 95% confidence interval 73.7-98.1%; P = 0.49) and cardiovascular (odds ratio 96.6%, 95% confidence interval 77.9-99.5%; P = 0.47) mortality at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS The Portico TAVI system demonstrated an acceptable rate of new PPI at 1 year without increased mortality risk to patients. New-onset LBBB was common during the procedure, with the majority of events spontaneously resolving by 30 days. No intraprocedural factors were shown to independently predict new PPI. Clinical trial registration number NCT01493284.

[1]  T. Walther,et al.  Implantation and 30-Day Follow-Up on All 4 Valve Sizes Within the Portico Transcatheter Aortic Bioprosthetic Family. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[2]  I. Meredith,et al.  Incidence and predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation following treatment with the repositionable Lotus™ transcatheter aortic valve , 2017, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[3]  W. Rottbauer,et al.  Predictors for permanent pacemaker implantation in patients undergoing transfemoral aortic valve implantation with the Edwards Sapien 3 valve , 2017, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[4]  M. Murata,et al.  Predictive factor and clinical consequence of left bundle-branch block after a transcatheter aortic valve implantation. , 2017, International journal of cardiology.

[5]  S. Rosenkranz,et al.  Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With the SAPIEN 3. , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[6]  A. Regueiro,et al.  Impact of New-Onset Left Bundle Branch Block and Periprocedural Permanent Pacemaker Implantation on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2016, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[7]  R. Lange,et al.  1-Year Outcomes With the Fully Repositionable and Retrievable Lotus Transcatheter Aortic Replacement Valve in 120 High-Risk Surgical Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: Results of the REPRISE II Study. , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[8]  K. Stangl,et al.  Optimal Implantation Depth and Adherence to Guidelines on Permanent Pacing to Improve the Results of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With the Medtronic CoreValve System: The CoreValve Prospective, International, Post-Market ADVANCE-II Study. , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[9]  Peter Jüni,et al.  Predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR: a meta-analysis. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  Maurice Buchbinder,et al.  Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  J. Webb,et al.  Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Impact on Late Clinical Outcomes and Left Ventricular Function , 2013, Circulation.

[12]  H. Gonçalves,et al.  Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Requirements of Pacing Over Time , 2013, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[13]  Robert H. Anderson,et al.  Anatomy of the Aortic Valvar Complex and Its Implications for Transcatheter Implantation of the Aortic Valve , 2008, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[14]  M. Schemper,et al.  Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  M. Mack,et al.  Predictors and clinical outcomes of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the PARTNER (Placement of AoRtic TraNscathetER Valves) trial and registry. , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.