The Form and Function of the Loaded Human Spine

Klausen, K. The form and function of the loaded human spine. Acta physiol. scand. 1965. 65. 176–190. — The reaction of the spine and its muscles to an increase of the pull of gravity was investigated in different ways: The change of the curves of the spine was measured with an inclinometer. The placement of the line of gravity in relation to L4 and the ankle joints was determined, and the activity of the trunk muscles and some of the leg muscles was investigated electromyographically. From a discussion of the mechanical effect of gravity on the individual joints, and on the spine as a whole it is concluded that the short, deep muscles of the back must play an important part in stabilizing the individual joints, and that the long back muscles or the abdominal muscles are responsible for the stabilization of the spine as a whole. It was found that an increased pull of gravity always was counteracted by increased activity in one set of muscles only, i. e. either in the back muscles or in the abdominal wall muscles. An increased pull of gravity gave rise to a flattening of the lumbar lordosis probably due to a deformation of the discs, while the thoracic kyphosis was almost unaltered. A load placed high on the back caused the trunk to lean, slightly forward, and tbe increased pull of gnavity was counteracted by an increased activity of the lower back muscles. A load placed low on the back caused the activity of the back muscles to decrease, and in most cases the pull backwards of the load was counteracted by the psoas muscle.

[1]  S MOLBECH,et al.  ON THE PARADOXIDAL EFFECT OF SOME TWO-JOINT MUSCLES. , 1965, Acta morphologica Neerlando-Scandinavica.

[2]  E. Asmussen,et al.  The weight-carrying function of the human spine. , 1960, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[3]  W. Floyd,et al.  The function of the erectores spinae muscles in certain movements and postures in man * , 1955, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  O. Lippold,et al.  The relation between force and integrated electrical activity in fatigued muscle , 1956, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  F. A. Hellebrandt,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF THE ARMY PACK ON POSTURAL STABILITY AND STANCE MECHANICS , 1944 .

[6]  E ASMUSSEN,et al.  Posture, mobility and strength of the back in boys, 7 to 16 years old. , 1959, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[7]  F. A. Hellebrandt,et al.  STANDING AS A GEOTROPIC REFLEX: The Mechanism of the Asynchronous Rotation of Motor Units , 1938 .

[8]  Thomas Dp The effect of load carriage on normal standing in man. , 1959 .

[9]  J. Sheldon The effect of age on the control of sway. , 1963, Gerontologia clinica.

[10]  J W SMITH,et al.  The act of standing. , 1953, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[11]  O C J LIPPOLD,et al.  The relation between integrated action potentials in a human muscle and its isometric tension , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  B. Åkerblom Standing and sitting posture , 1948 .

[13]  B. Bresler,et al.  Role of the Trunk in Stability of the Spine , 1961 .

[14]  P. Wiles Movements of the Lumbar Vertebrae during Flexion and Extension: (Section of Orthopaedics). , 1935, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[15]  E. Asmussen,et al.  Form and function of the erect human spine. , 1962, Clinical orthopaedics.

[16]  Basmajian Jv Weight-bearing by ligaments and muscles. , 1961 .