Open Innovation and Strategy

The increasing adoption of more open approaches to innovation fits uneasily with current theories of business strategy. Traditional business strategy has guided firms to develop defensible positions against the forces of competition and power in the value chain, implying the importance of constructing barriers rather than promoting value creation through openness. Recently, however, firms and even whole industries, such as the software industry, are experimenting with novel business models based on harnessing collective creativity through open innovation. The apparent success of some of these experiments challenges prevailing views of strategy. At the same time, many of these experimenters now are grappling with issues related to value capture and sustainability of their business models, as well as issues of corporate influence and the potential co-option of open initiatives. These issues bring us back to traditional business strategy, which can offer important insights. To make strategic sense of innovation communities, ecosystems, networks, and their implications for competitive advantage, a new approach to strategy—open strategy—is needed. Open strategy balances the tenets of traditional business strategy with the promise of open innovation.

[1]  R. Rivera,et al.  The Concept of Corporate Strategy , 2009 .

[2]  Chris Arney Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything , 2008 .

[3]  David S. Meyer,et al.  Platform Leadership , 2007 .

[4]  Don Tapscott,et al.  Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything , 2006 .

[5]  Martin W. Wallin,et al.  A man on the inside: Unlocking communities as complementary assets , 2006 .

[6]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Network Effects in the Governance of Strategic Alliances , 2006 .

[7]  Sonali K. Shah Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[8]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[9]  Neal Bukeavich,et al.  Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed , 2006 .

[10]  J. Diamond Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed , 2005 .

[11]  David C Grabowski,et al.  Graduated driver licensing and teen traffic fatalities. , 2005, Journal of health economics.

[12]  Chi-Hyon Lee,et al.  Preferential Linkage and Network Evolution: A Conceptual Model and Empirical Test in the U.S. Video Game Sector , 2004 .

[13]  R. Merges A New Dynamism in the Public Domain , 2004 .

[14]  Ammon Salter,et al.  The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms , 2004 .

[15]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[16]  S. Borgatti,et al.  The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology , 2003 .

[17]  P. Soh The role of networking alliances in information acquisition and its implications for new product performance , 2003 .

[18]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Where Do Small Worlds Come From? , 2003 .

[19]  G. Davis,et al.  The Small World of the American Corporate Elite, 1982-2001 , 2003 .

[20]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Overcoming Local Search Through Alliances and Mobility , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[21]  Melissa A. Schilling Technological Leapfrogging: Lessons from the U.S. Video Game Console Industry , 2003 .

[22]  Timothy F. Bresnahan,et al.  Technological Competition and the Structure of the Computer Industry , 2003 .

[23]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Safeguarding Investments in Asymmetric Interorganizational Relationships: Theory and Evidence , 2003 .

[24]  Rajendra K. Srivastava,et al.  The Integrated Networks Model: Explaining Resource Allocations in Network Markets , 2003 .

[25]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age , 2003 .

[26]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Do alliances promote knowledge flows , 2006 .

[27]  Scott Gallagher,et al.  Innovation and competition in standard-based industries: a historical analysis of the US home video game market , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[28]  P. Allison,et al.  7. Fixed-Effects Negative Binomial Regression Models , 2002 .

[29]  Anita M. McGahan,et al.  What Do We Know About Variance in Accounting Profitability? , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[30]  J. Tirole,et al.  Some Simple Economics of Open Source , 2002 .

[31]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Linked: The New Science of Networks , 2002 .

[32]  Andrew Hargadon,et al.  Special Issue: Knowledge, Knowing, and Organizations: Action and Possibility: Reconciling Dual Perspectives of Knowledge in Organizations , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[33]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Knowledge Networks: Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies , 2002 .

[34]  Martin Suter,et al.  Small World , 2002 .

[35]  S H Strogatz,et al.  Random graph models of social networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  Lawrence Lessig,et al.  The future of ideas - the fate of the commons in a connected world , 2002 .

[37]  Venkatesh Shankar,et al.  Network Effects and Competition: An Empirical Analysis of the Home Video Game Industry , 2002 .

[38]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Managing in the Modular Age , 2002 .

[39]  J. T. Wulu,et al.  Regression analysis of count data , 2002 .

[40]  Rachelle C. Sampson,et al.  The Cost of Misaligned Governance in R&D Alliances , 2003 .

[41]  Varghese P. George,et al.  From the Bottom Up? Technical Committee Activity and Alliance Formation , 2001 .

[42]  Joel Podolny Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Market1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[43]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[44]  B. Kogut,et al.  The Small World of Germany and the Durability of National Networks , 2001, American Sociological Review.

[45]  Min-Woong Sohn,et al.  Distance and cosine measures of niche overlap , 2001, Soc. Networks.

[46]  Richard Schmalensee,et al.  An Analysis Of The Government's Economic Case In U.S. v. Microsoft , 2001 .

[47]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Pajek - Analysis and Visualization of Large Networks , 2001, Graph Drawing Software.

[48]  James E. Rauch,et al.  Bandwidth and Echo: Trust, Information, and Gossip in Social Networks , 2001 .

[49]  Robin Cowan,et al.  The dynamics of collective invention , 2003 .

[50]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  Marketing Niche Entry Decisions: Competition, Learning, and Strategy in Tokyo Banking, 1894–1936 , 2000 .

[51]  G. Ahuja Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[52]  Toby E. Stuart Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates i , 2000 .

[53]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[54]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Don't go it alone: alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology , 2000 .

[55]  R. Gulati,et al.  Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue: strategic networks , 2000 .

[56]  T. Khanna,et al.  Do Firms Learn to Create Value? The Case of Alliances , 2000 .

[57]  B. Kogut The network as knowledge : Generative rules and the emergence of structure , 2000 .

[58]  Richard B. McKenzie,et al.  Trust On Trial: How The Microsoft Case Is Reframing The Rules Of Competition , 2000 .

[59]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Decay functions , 2000, Soc. Networks.

[60]  R. Gulati,et al.  STRATEGIC NETWORKS , 2000 .

[61]  Toby E. Stuart A Structural Perspective on Organizational Innovation , 1999 .

[62]  D. Watts Networks, Dynamics, and the Small‐World Phenomenon1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[63]  Tom A. B. Snijders,et al.  Friendship Networks Through Time: An Actor-Oriented Dynamic Statistical Network Model , 1999, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[64]  D. Hecker High-Technology Employment: A Broader View , 1999 .

[65]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[66]  R. Gulati,et al.  Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[67]  Kenneth W. Koput,et al.  Networks and Knowledge Production: Collaboration and Patenting in Biotechnology , 1999 .

[68]  M. Feldman The New Economics Of Innovation, Spillovers And Agglomeration: Areview Of Empirical Studies , 1999 .

[69]  Stephen E. Margolis,et al.  Winners, Losers & Microsoft: Competition and Antitrust in High Technology , 1999 .

[70]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[71]  R. Gulati Alliances and networks , 1998 .

[72]  Robert R. Faulkner,et al.  Hazards of the Market: The Continuity and Dissolution of Interorganizational Market Relationships , 1998 .

[73]  Andrew B. Hargadon Firms as Knowledge Brokers: Lessons in Pursuing Continuous Innovation , 1998 .

[74]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[75]  Nicholas S. Vonortas Research joint ventures in the US , 1997 .

[76]  D. E. Stokes Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation , 1997 .

[77]  M. Porter,et al.  HOW MUCH DOES INDUSTRY MATTER, REALLY? , 1997 .

[78]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[79]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[80]  M. Porter,et al.  HOW MUCH DOES INDUSTRY MATTER , REALLY ? , 1997 .

[81]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[82]  B. Uzzi,et al.  The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect , 1996 .

[83]  W. Arthur,et al.  Increasing returns and the new world of business. , 1996, Harvard business review.

[84]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[85]  R. Gulati Social Structure and Alliance Formation Patterns: A Longitudinal Analysis , 1995 .

[86]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  A Role-Based Ecology of Technological Change , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.

[87]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test , 1995 .

[88]  W. Arthur,et al.  Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy , 1996 .

[89]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[90]  R. Blundell,et al.  Dynamic Count Data Models of Technological Innovation , 1994 .

[91]  David C. Mowery,et al.  SEMATECH and collaborative research: Lessons in the design of high‐technology consortia , 1994 .

[92]  Jitendra V. Singh Organizational Niches and the Dynamics of Organizational Mortality , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[93]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Systems Competition and Network Effects , 1994 .

[94]  Jan B. Heide Interorganizational Governance in Marketing Channels , 1994 .

[95]  Kazuo Yamaguchi,et al.  The flow of information through social networks: diagonal-free measures of inefficiency and the structural determinants of inefficiency , 1994 .

[96]  B. Kogut,et al.  INTERFIRM COOPERATION AND STARTUP INNOVATION IN THE BIOTECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY. , 1993 .

[97]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[98]  C. Coulton,et al.  Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression , 1993 .

[99]  Margaret A. Peteraf The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[100]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management , 1992 .

[101]  R. Eccles,et al.  Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action , 1992 .

[102]  O. Williamson / STRATEGIZING, ECONOMIZING, AND ECONOMIC ORGANIZATION , 1991 .

[103]  C. Freeman Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues , 1991 .

[104]  Z. Griliches The Search for R&D Spillovers , 1991 .

[105]  G. Hamel Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances , 1991 .

[106]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[107]  R. Rumelt How much does industry matter , 1991 .

[108]  C. Oliver Determinants of Interorganizational Relationships: Integration and Future Directions , 1990 .

[109]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[110]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[111]  M. Trajtenberg A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[112]  P. Romer Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[113]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset Stock Accumulation and the Sustainability of Competitive Advantage: Reply , 1989 .

[114]  S. D. Berkowitz,et al.  Social Structures: A Network Approach , 1989 .

[115]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[116]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Another Look at the Network Boundaries of American Markets , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[117]  S. Wasserman,et al.  Mimetic Processes within an Interorganizational Field: An Empirical Test , 1989 .

[118]  C. Shapiro The theory of business strategy. , 1989, The Rand journal of economics.

[119]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[120]  G. Dosi Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation , 1988 .

[121]  B. Wellman Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. , 1988 .

[122]  Bjørn L. Basberg,et al.  Patents and the measurement of technological change: A survey of the literature☆ , 1987 .

[123]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[124]  J. Barney Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy , 1986 .

[125]  P. Romer Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[126]  L. Vogel,et al.  Strategy and Structure , 1986 .

[127]  A. Jaffe Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[128]  A. Cameron,et al.  Econometric models based on count data. Comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests , 1986 .

[129]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[130]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R&D Relationship , 1984 .

[131]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[132]  R. Rumelt,et al.  Diversification strategy and profitability , 1982 .

[133]  Gavin J. Wright An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1982 .

[134]  Peter V. Marsden,et al.  Introducing Influence Processes into a System of Collective Decisions , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[135]  J. Heckman Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[136]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  On the Nature, Formation, and Maintenance of Relations Among Organizations , 1976 .

[137]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[138]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[139]  K. Andrews The Concept of Corporate Strategy , 1971 .

[140]  Jacob Schmookler,et al.  Invention and Economic Growth , 1967 .

[141]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[142]  J. Bain Barriers to new competition , 1957 .

[143]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  Interfirm Collaboration Networks: , 2022, Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and the Growth Mechanism of the Free-Enterprise Economies.

[144]  D. North Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events , 1994 .