Addressing foundational elements of regional land-use change forecasting

Regional land-use models must address several foundational elements, including understanding geographic setting, establishing regional land-use histories, modeling process and representing drivers of change, representing local land-use patterns, managing issues of scale and complexity, and development of scenarios. Key difficulties include managing an array of biophysical and socioeconomic processes across multiple spatial and temporal scales, and acquiring and utilizing empirical data to support the analysis of those processes. The Southeastern and Pacific Northwest regions of the United States, two heavily forested regions with significant forest industries, are examined in the context of these foundational elements. Geographic setting fundamentally affects both the primary land cover (forest) in the two regions, and the structure and form of land use (forestry). Land-use histories of the regions can be used to parameterize land-use models, validate model performance, and explore land-use scenarios. Drivers of change in the two regions are many and varied, with issues of scale and complexity posing significant challenges. Careful scenario development can be used to simplify process-based land-use models, and can improve our ability to address specific research questions. The successful modeling of land-use change in these two areas requires integration of both top-down and bottom-up drivers of change, using scenario frameworks to both guide and simplify the modeling process. Modular approaches, with utilization and integration of existing process models, allow regional land-use modelers the opportunity to better represent primary drivers of land-use change. However, availability of data to represent driving forces remains a primary obstacle.

[1]  Daowei Zhang,et al.  Small-Scale Non-industrial Private Forest Ownership in the United States: Rationale and Implications for Forest Management , 2005 .

[2]  H. Couclelis.  Why I no longer work with Agents , 2001 .

[3]  F. Swanson,et al.  LANDSCAPE PATTERN RESPONSE TO CHANGES IN PATTERN GENERATION RULES: LAND-USE LEGACIES IN FORESTRY , 1994 .

[4]  Z. Naveh.  Ten major premises for a holistic conception of multifunctional landscapes , 2001 .

[5]  Raymond M. Sheffield,et al.  The effects of population growth on timber management and inventories in Virginia , 1999 .

[6]  Paul Schot,et al.  Land use change modelling: current practice and research priorities , 2004 .

[7]  Eric Koomen,et al.  Comparing the input, output, and validation maps for several models of land change , 2008 .

[8]  Robert Gilmore Pontius,et al.  Uncertainty in Extrapolations of Predictive Land-Change Models , 2005 .

[9]  J. Vose,et al.  Potential Climate Change Effects on Loblolly Pine Forest Productivity and Drainage across the Southern United States , 1996 .

[10]  M. Wimberly,et al.  A multi-scale assessment of human and environmental constraints on forest land cover change on the Oregon (USA) coast range , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[11]  Terry L Sohl,et al.  Using an Ecoregion Framework to Analyze Land-Cover and Land-Use Dynamics , 2004, Environmental management.

[12]  Richard G. Lathrop,et al.  Relationship of Land‐Use/Land‐Cover Patterns and Surface‐Water Quality in The Mullica River Basin 1 , 2007 .

[13]  B. Eickhout,et al.  A multi-scale, multi-model approach for analyzing the future dynamics of European land use , 2008 .

[14]  Stephen V. Stehman,et al.  A Strategy for Estimating the Rates of Recent United States Land-Cover Changes , 2002 .

[15]  Scott J Goetz,et al.  Assessing Development Pressure in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed: An Evaluation of Two Land-Use Change Models , 2004, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[16]  Daniel J. Marcucci.  Landscape history as a planning tool. , 2000 .

[17]  E. Irwin,et al.  Theory, data, methods: developing spatially explicit economic models of land use change , 2001 .

[18]  T. Loveland,et al.  The characteristics and interpretability of land surface change and implications for project design , 2004 .

[19]  T. Sohl,et al.  Using the FORE-SCE model to project land-cover change in the southeastern United States , 2008 .

[20]  Bas Eickhout,et al.  The land-use projections and resulting emissions in the IPCC SRES scenarios scenarios as simulated by the IMAGE 2.2 model , 2004 .

[21]  Jacques Baudry,et al.  The implication of past and present landscape patterns for biodiversity research: introduction and overview , 2003, Landscape Ecology.

[22]  P. Verburg,et al.  Projecting land use transitions at forest fringes in the Philippines at two spatial scales , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[23]  J. Gareth Polhill,et al.  Agent-based land-use models: a review of applications , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[24]  Thomas A. Spies,et al.  Dynamics and Pattern of a Managed Coniferous Forest Landscape in Oregon , 1994 .

[25]  Hong S. He,et al.  Performance Evaluation of the SLEUTH Model in the Shenyang Metropolitan Area of Northeastern China , 2009 .

[26]  J. Kline,et al.  A spatial model of land use change for western Oregon and western Washington. , 2001 .

[27]  A. Burnicki,et al.  Stochastic Simulation of Land-Cover Change Using Geostatistics and Generalized Additive Models , 2002 .

[28]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Land Ownership and Land‐Cover Change in the Southern Appalachian Highlands and the Olympic Peninsula , 1996 .

[29]  Bruce A. McCarl,et al.  Effects of global climate change on the US forest sector: response functions derived from a dynamic resource and market simulator , 2000 .

[30]  ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON SOUTHERN FORESTS , 1997 .

[31]  S. Durrans,et al.  A REVISED VERSION OF PnET‐II TO SIMULATE THE HYDROLOGIC CYCLE IN SOUTHEASTERN FORESTED AREAS 1 , 2002 .

[32]  J. Omernik.  Ecoregions of the Conterminous United States , 1987 .

[33]  US National Climate Change Assessment on Forest Ecosystems: An Introduction , 2001 .

[34]  C. Tomlin.  Geographic information systems and cartographic modeling , 1990 .

[35]  Marc E. McDill,et al.  Promoting Large, Compact Mature Forest Patches in Harvest Scheduling Models , 2008 .

[36]  M. Janssen,et al.  Multi-Agent Systems for the Simulation of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: A Review , 2003 .

[37]  D. Wear,et al.  Southern Forest Resource Assessment Southern Forest Resource Assessment , 2002 .

[38]  T. Loveland,et al.  The FORE-SCE model: a practical approach for projecting land cover change using scenario-based modeling , 2007 .

[39]  R. Neilson,et al.  Forest Processes and Global Environmental Change: Predicting the Effects of Individual and Multiple Stressors , 2001 .

[40]  Peter H. Verburg,et al.  Simulating feedbacks in land use and land cover change models , 2006, Landscape Ecology.

[41]  Ronald R Rindfuss,et al.  Developing a science of land change: challenges and methodological issues. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.