Energy, environmental and economic comparison of different powertrain/fuel options using well-to-wheels assessment, energy and external costs – European market analysis

The well-to-wheels assessment is widely used in the automotive sector to analyze the efficiency and competitiveness of different powertrain/fuel options. The paper proposes a global index that takes into account both the energy and environmental aspects on an uniform basis, through the assignment of the costs associated to the energy and to the pollutant emissions. The European market is analyzed and other pollutants (NOx, PM and SOx) are added to the traditional well-to-wheels evaluations (energy and GHG). The proposed well-to-wheels global index offers a useful place-list that takes into account both energy and environmental aspects and, at the current market conditions, it results that the energy cost prevails (70–85%) over the environmental costs, and among the analyzed external costs, the main contribution is due to the GHG emissions. Natural gas-derived fuels seem to be the most promising. The global index for battery electric vehicle from a European mix are closely linked to the driving range. Conventional biofuels are very critical at present, while significant improvement of the well-to-wheels global index is foreseen for when new generation biofuels will be mature (2030 forecast). In short, even though the proposed global index is not an exhaustive index, it could be a useful tool for decision makers.

[1]  C. E. Thomas,et al.  Fuel cell and battery electric vehicles compared , 2009 .

[2]  Avinash Kumar Agarwal,et al.  Biofuels (alcohols and biodiesel) applications as fuels for internal combustion engines , 2007 .

[3]  Xunmin Ou,et al.  Energy consumption and GHG emissions of six biofuel pathways by LCA in (the) People's Republic of China , 2009 .

[4]  Vincent Mahieu,et al.  Well-to-wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the european context , 2004 .

[5]  Pamela L. Spath,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Hydrogen Production via Natural Gas Steam Reforming , 2000 .

[6]  Ola Maurstad,et al.  Well-to-wheel study of passenger vehicles in the Norwegian energy system , 2007 .

[7]  Zheng Li,et al.  Pathways for hydrogen infrastructure development in China: Integrated assessment for vehicle fuels and a case study of Beijing , 2007 .

[8]  Ye Wu,et al.  Total versus urban: Well-to-wheels assessment of criteria pollutant emissions from various vehicle/fuel systems , 2009 .

[9]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Natural gas as an alternative to crude oil in automotive fuel chains well-to-wheel analysis and transition strategy development , 2005 .

[10]  Xianguo Li,et al.  Life cycle comparison of fuel cell vehicles and internal combustion engine vehicles for Canada and the United States , 2006 .

[11]  Giampaolo Manzolini,et al.  Energy analysis of electric vehicles using batteries or fuel cells through well-to-wheel driving cycle simulations , 2009 .

[12]  Zhang Xiliang,et al.  Energy consumption and GHG emissions of six biofuel pathways by LCA in China , 2009 .

[13]  Michael Wang,et al.  Fuel choices for fuel-cell vehicles: well-to-wheels energy and emission impacts , 2002 .

[14]  Michael Wang,et al.  Well-to-Wheels Analysis of Advanced Fuel/Vehicle Systems — A North American Study of Energy Use, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Criteria Pollutant Emissions , 2005 .

[15]  T L Farias,et al.  A tank-to-wheel analysis tool for energy and emissions studies in road vehicles. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[16]  Peter Mizsey,et al.  Comparison of different vehicle power trains , 2001 .

[17]  Xianguo Li,et al.  Life cycle analysis of vehicles powered by a fuel cell and by internal combustion engine for Canada , 2006 .