Internet use in the home: Digital inequality from a domestication perspective

This study uses a domestication approach to digital inequality. The aim is to uncover whether and why less-educated families benefit less from Internet use than highly educated families. The predominantly quantitative approach of digital divide research provides little explanation as to why digital inequalities exist. Interviews were conducted with the heads of 48 Dutch families. The results showed that Internet use and routines in the home are shaped differently for families with different educational backgrounds. In all four phases of domestication, the highly educated demonstrated a critical view toward the Internet, resulting in considered use and redefinition. Less-educated members tended to be less interested in Internet developments and overall have a less reflective stance. Inequalities between different social strata already arise in the early stages of domestication and are magnified in the subsequent phases.

[1]  E. Hargittai,et al.  Digital Distinction: Status-Specific Types of Internet Usage , 2009 .

[2]  R. Silverstone.  Media, Technology And Everyday Life In Europe: From Information To Communication , 2005 .

[3]  Ellen Helsper,et al.  A corresponding fields model for the links between social and digital exclusion , 2012 .

[4]  Frederick J. Riggins,et al.  The Digital Divide: Current and Future Research Directions , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Leslie Haddon,et al.  Roger Silverstone’s legacies: domestication , 2007, New Media Soc..

[6]  A ZoonenvanE.,et al.  Fishing with false teeth: women, gender and the internet , 1998 .

[7]  V. Shavers.  Measurement of socioeconomic status in health disparities research. , 2007, Journal of the National Medical Association.

[8]  R. Silverstone,et al.  Information and communication technologies and the moral economy of the household , 2003 .

[9]  Helen J. Richardson,et al.  A ‘smart house’ is not a home: The domestication of ICTs , 2009, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[10]  Alexander van Deursen,et al.  Determinants of Internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide , 2017, Telematics Informatics.

[11]  Teresa Correa,et al.  The Power of Youth: How the Bottom-up Technology Transmission from Children to Parents is Related to Digital (In)equality , 2015 .

[12]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People's Online Skills , 2002, First Monday.

[13]  Leslie Haddon,et al.  Explaining ICT consumption: the case of the home computer , 1993 .

[14]  Roger Silverstone,et al.  Listening to a long conversation: An ethnographic approach to the study of information and communication technologies in the home , 1991 .

[15]  Ellen Helsper,et al.  The Compoundness and Sequentiality of Digital Inequality , 2017 .

[16]  C. Mills,et al.  The Theory of Social and Economic Organization , 1948 .

[17]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  Conceptualizing and Testing a Social Cognitive Model of the Digital Divide , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  Laura Robinson.  A TASTE FOR THE NECESSARY , 2009 .

[19]  Roger Silverstone,et al.  Domesticating domestication: reflections on the life of a concept , 2006 .

[20]  Punie Yves,et al.  Domestication Of Media And Technology , 2005 .

[21]  Grant Blank,et al.  Dimensions of Internet use: amount, variety, and types , 2014 .

[22]  Rebecca Eynon,et al.  Development and validation of the Internet Skills Scale (ISS) , 2016 .

[23]  Shana M. Mason,et al.  APPLYING COMMUNICATION THEORY TO DIGITAL DIVIDE RESEARCH , 2003 .

[24]  E. Hargittai,et al.  Digital Inequality , 2008, Commun. Res..

[25]  Leslie Haddon,et al.  Domestication Analysis, Objects of Study, and the Centrality of Technologies in Everyday Life , 2011 .

[26]  Danny Beusch.  Internet society: The Internet in everyday life. , 2006 .

[27]  Johannes A.G.M..  The deepening Divide: Inequality in the information society. , 2005 .

[28]  Ann Peterson Bishop,et al.  The internet for empowerment of minority and marginalized users , 2004, New Media Soc..

[29]  L. Haddon,et al.  Teleworking in the 1990s - a view from the home , 1993 .

[30]  R. Silverstone,et al.  Consuming technologies : media and information in domestic spaces , 1993 .

[31]  Alexander Jam Van Deursen,et al.  The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access , 2018, New Media Soc..

[32]  David Fishlock,et al.  Alone or Together , 1967 .

[33]  Els Rommes,et al.  "Fitting the Internet into our lives"; Internet courses for disadvantaged users , 2005 .

[34]  Yves Punie,et al.  The Future of Ambient Intelligence in Europe: the Need for more Everyday Life , 2005 .

[35]  Alexander van Deursen,et al.  Increasing inequalities in what we do online: A longitudinal cross sectional analysis of Internet activities among the Dutch population (2010 to 2013) over gender, age, education, and income , 2015, Telematics Informatics.

[36]  Jason Swarts,et al.  Communication design , 2012, CDQR.

[37]  Leslie Haddon,et al.  The Contribution of Domestication Research to In-Home Computing and Media Consumption , 2006, Inf. Soc..

[38]  Paul DiMaggio,et al.  Network Effects and Social Inequality , 2012 .

[39]  Leslie Haddon,et al.  Design and the domestication of information and communication technologies: technical change and everyday life , 1996 .

[40]  P. Bourdieu.  Le sens pratique , 1976 .

[41]  Johanna L. H. Birkland.  A Theory of ICT User Types: Exploring Domestication and Meaning of ICTS through Comparative Case Studies , 2013 .