Relationship between distortion and working memory for digital noise-reduction processing in hearing aids

Several recent studies have shown a relationship between working memory and the ability of older adults to benefit from specific advanced signal processing algorithms in hearing aids. In this study, we quantify tradeoffs between benefit due to noise reduction and the perceptual costs associated with distortion caused by the noise reduction algorithm. We also investigate the relationship between these tradeoffs and working memory abilities. Speech intelligibility, speech quality and perceived listening effort were measured in a cohort of elderly adults with hearing loss. Test materials were low-context sentences presented in fluctuating noise conditions at several signal-to-noise ratios. Speech stimuli were processed with a binary mask noise-reduction strategy. The amount of distortion produced by the noise reduction algorithm was parametrically varied by manipulating two binary mask parameters, error rate and attenuation rate. Working memory was assessed with a reading span test. Results will be discussed in terms of the extent to which intelligibility, quality and effort ratings are explained by the amount of distortion and/or noise and by working memory ability.[Funded by NIH, Oticon and GN ReSound]

[1]  Pamela Souza,et al.  Working Memory, Age, and Hearing Loss: Susceptibility to Hearing Aid Distortion , 2013, Ear and hearing.

[2]  Jesper Jensen,et al.  An Algorithm for Intelligibility Prediction of Time–Frequency Weighted Noisy Speech , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[3]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Prediction of speech intelligibility based on an auditory preprocessing model , 2010, Speech Commun..

[4]  James M. Kates,et al.  The Hearing-Aid Speech Quality Index (HASQI) , 2010 .

[5]  Sridhar Kalluri,et al.  Objective measures of listening effort: effects of background noise and noise reduction. , 2009, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[6]  Deliang Wang,et al.  Role of mask pattern in intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  DeLiang Wang,et al.  Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  P. Loizou,et al.  Factors influencing intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech: implications for noise reduction. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  James M Kates,et al.  Coherence and the speech intelligibility index. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  S. Soli,et al.  Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  J M Kates,et al.  On using coherence to measure distortion in hearing aids. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  T. Lunner,et al.  Effects of hearing aid signal processing on cognitive outcome measurements , 2010 .

[13]  T. Lunner,et al.  Cognitive Spare Capacity Test , 2010 .

[14]  Ephraim Speech enhancement using a minimum mean square error short-time spectral amplitude estimator , 1984 .