Comparative evaluation and the relationship between quality, satisfaction, and repurchase loyalty

This study evaluates alternative measurement approaches to examining the relationship between perceived quality performance, customer satisfaction, and repurchase loyalty. The authors define and measure the constructs within a relative attitudinal framework and compare these results to a noncomparative or individual evaluation of products. In addition, loyalty is measured and defined as self-reported repurchase behavior instead of purchase intention. The proposed model, with satisfaction as a mediator between quality and repurchase loyalty, was found to be an acceptable representation of the data across four products and for both comparative and noncomparative evaluations. The use of relative attitudes, however, indicated a much stronger relationship between quality, satisfaction, and loyalty than the attitudes toward a product when they are performed as an individual evaluation. With respect to predictive ability, the study findings suggest that quality, satisfaction, and loyalty should be defined and measured within a relative attitudinal framework.

[1]  Marketing Notes and Communications: Territorial Restriction in Distribution Systems: Current Legal Developments , 1975 .

[2]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[3]  J. Jacoby,et al.  Brand Loyalty: Measurement and Management , 1978 .

[4]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  An Investigation into the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction , 1982 .

[5]  Bob T. W. Wu,et al.  The halo effect in store image measurement , 1987 .

[6]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[7]  Andrew Ehrenberg,et al.  Robust Measures of Consumer Brand Beliefs , 1990 .

[8]  S. J. Kraus,et al.  Attitudes and the Prediction of Behavior: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature , 1990 .

[9]  C. Fornell,et al.  A Framework for Comparing Customer Satisfaction across Individuals and Product Categories , 1991 .

[10]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research , 1991 .

[11]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[12]  R. Kenneth Teas,et al.  Item Context and the Stability of Entity-Based and Attribute-Based Multiattribute Scaling Methods , 1992 .

[13]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1993 .

[14]  Barbara Bickart,et al.  Carryover and Backfire Effects in Marketing Research , 1993 .

[15]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling With the Simplis Command Language , 1993 .

[16]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  Encounter Satisfaction versus Overall Satisfaction versus Quality: The Customer's Voice , 1994 .

[17]  Stephen W. Brown,et al.  Consumer satisfaction and perceived quality: Complementary or divergent constructs? , 1994 .

[18]  Alan Dick,et al.  Customer loyalty: Toward an integrated conceptual framework , 1994 .

[19]  Steven A. Taylor,et al.  An assessment of the relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction in the formation of consumers' purchase intentions , 1994 .

[20]  Monique M. Raats,et al.  Including Moral Dimensions of Choice Within the Structure of the Theory of Planned Behavior1 , 1995 .

[21]  J. Bloemer,et al.  The complex relationship between consumer satisfaction and brand loyalty , 1995 .

[22]  Seymour Sudman,et al.  Thinking about Answers: The Application of Cognitive Process to Survey Methodology , 1996 .

[23]  B. van den Putte,et al.  A comparison of behavioural alternative models in the context of the theory of reasoned action , 1996 .

[24]  R. Oliver.  Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective On The Consumer , 1996 .

[25]  C. Fornell,et al.  The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature, Purpose, and Findings , 1996 .

[26]  D. Alwin,et al.  Feeling Thermometers Versus 7-Point Scales , 1997 .

[27]  Ko de Ruyter,et al.  Merging service quality and service satisfaction. An empirical test of an integrative model , 1997 .

[28]  M. Conner,et al.  Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review and Avenues for Further Research , 1998 .

[29]  Barry J. Babin,et al.  The nature of satisfaction: An updated examination and analysis , 1998 .

[30]  Knowlton W. Johnson.  Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: Testing a Theory for Research Use , 1998 .

[31]  K. Ruyter,et al.  On the relationship between store image, store satisfaction and store loyalty , 1998 .

[32]  R. Oliver.  Whence Consumer Loyalty? , 1999 .

[33]  J. J. Cronin,et al.  Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments , 2000 .

[34]  P. A. Dabholkar,et al.  A comprehensive framework for service quality: an investigation of critical conceptual and measurement issues through a longitudinal study , 2000 .

[35]  A. Gustafsson,et al.  Improving Customer Satisfaction, Loyalty, and Profit : An Integrated Measurement and Management System , 2000 .

[36]  L. Rips,et al.  The Psychology of Survey Response , 2000 .

[37]  V. Zeithaml.  Service quality, profitability, and the economic worth of customers: What we know and what we need to learn , 2000 .

[38]  A. Gustafsson,et al.  The Evolution and Future of National Customer Satisfaction Index Models , 2001 .

[39]  V. Mittal,et al.  Satisfaction, Repurchase Intent, and Repurchase Behavior: Investigating the Moderating Effect of Customer Characteristics , 2001 .

[40]  David M. Szymanski,et al.  Customer satisfaction: A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence , 2001 .

[41]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Thinking About Answers: The Application of Cognitive Processes to Survey Methodology , 1995, Quality of Life Research.