Economic theory and the global environment

Modern economic theory came to life in the middle of the twentieth century, providing the intellectual foundations for an unprecedented period of industrial expansion and globalization since World War II. Coupled with population growth, the successful trajectory of industrial society in the twentieth century led to a voracious use of natural resources and global environmental concerns in the twenty-first century. It is uncontested that, for the first time in recorded history, humans dominate the planet. We are changing the planet’s atmosphere, its bodies of water, and the complex web of species that makes life on earth. This radical change in circumstances led to rethinking of the foundations of human organization and, in particular, the industrial economy and the economic theory behind it. The rethinking is underway. Sustainable economics emerged in 1992 at the UN Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, anchored in the concept of BasicNeeds that was voted by 150 nations as a cornerstone of efforts to redefine economic development1. The formal theory of sustainable development was introduced in Chichilnisky (1997, 2000). In essence sustainable development seeks to meet the basic needs of the present without depriving the future from meeting its basic needs.

[1]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Nested externalities and polycentric institutions: must we wait for global solutions to climate change before taking actions at other scales? , 2012 .

[2]  Graciela Chichilnisky,et al.  Who Should Abate Carbon Emissions? An International Viewpoint , 1993 .

[3]  L. Lauwers Intergenerational equity, efficiency, and constructibility , 2012 .

[4]  Robert M. Solow,et al.  An Almost Practical Step Toward Sustainability , 1998 .

[5]  Geir B. Asheim,et al.  Sustainable recursive social welfare functions , 2010, Economic Theory.

[6]  L. Karp,et al.  Taxes versus quantities for a stock pollutant with endogenous abatement costs and asymmetric information , 2008 .

[7]  Graciela Chichilnisky,et al.  Environmental Markets: Equity and Efficiency , 2000 .

[8]  G. Hardin,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons , 1968, Green Planet Blues.

[9]  M. Tidball,et al.  Sustainable exploitation of a natural resource: a satisfying use of Chichilnisky’s criterion , 2012 .

[10]  J. Hourcade,et al.  Unspoken ethical issues in the climate affair: Insights from a theoretical analysis of negotiation mandates , 2012 .

[11]  Graciela Chichilnisky,et al.  The Green Golden Rule , 1995 .

[12]  D. Foley,et al.  Global warming and economic externalities , 2011, Economic Theory.

[13]  Walrasian prices in markets with tradable rights , 2012 .

[14]  N. Stern The Economics of Climate Change: Implications of Climate Change for Development , 2007 .

[15]  Graciela Chichilnisky,et al.  An axiomatic approach to sustainable development , 1996 .

[16]  Detrimental externalities, pollution rights, and the “Coase theorem” , 2012 .

[17]  Graciela Chichilnisky,et al.  What is Sustainable Development , 1997, Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy, Third Edition.

[18]  G. Chichilnisky Sustainable markets with short sales , 2011, Economic Theory.

[19]  Capital growth in a global warming model: will China and India sign a climate treaty? , 2012 .

[20]  J. Burniaux,et al.  Carbon leakages: a general equilibrium view , 2012 .

[21]  Economic Development and Efficiency Criteria in the Satisfaction of Basic Needs , 1977 .