The New Ecological Anthropology

Older ecologies have been remiss in the narrowness of their spatial and temporal horizons, their functionalist assumptions, and their apolitical character. Suspending functionalist assumptions and an emphasis upon (homeo)stasis, “the new ecological anthropology” is located at the intersection of global, national, regional, and local systems, studying the outcome of the interaction of multiple levels and multiple factors. It blends theoretical and empirical research with applied, policy-directed, and critical work in what Rappaport called an “engaged” anthropology; and it is otherwise attuned to the political aspects and implications of ecological processes. Carefully laying out a critique of previous ecologies by way of announcing newer approaches, the article insists on the need to recognize the importance of culture mediations in ecological processes rather than treating culture as epiphenomenal and as a mere adaptive tool. It closes with a discussion of the methodologies appropriate to the new ecological anthropology. [“the new ecology,” political ecology, applied or engaged anthropology, linkages methodology]

[1]  G. Green,et al.  Deforestation History of the Eastern Rain Forests of Madagascar from Satellite Images , 1990, Science.

[2]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Environmental Values in American Culture , 1995 .

[3]  R. Rappaport THE SACRED IN HUMAN EVOLUTION , 1971 .

[4]  R. Rappaport Pigs for the Ancestors: Ritual in the Ecology of a New Guinea People , 1971 .

[5]  M. Harris The Cultural Ecology of India's Sacred Cattle , 1992, Current Anthropology.

[6]  Robert W. Sussman,et al.  Satellite imagery, human ecology, anthropology, and deforestation in Madagascar , 1994 .

[7]  D. Korten Community Organization and Rural Development : A Learning Process Approach , 1980 .

[8]  David Pepper,et al.  The Roots of Modern Environmentalism , 1984 .

[9]  Lisa L. Gezon Political ecology and conflict in Ankarana, Madagascar , 1997 .

[10]  N. Bose,et al.  The Cultural Ecology of India's Sacred Cattle [and Comments and Replies] , 1966, Current Anthropology.

[11]  I. Wallerstein,et al.  The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. , 1975 .

[12]  Jonathan Friedman,et al.  Marxism, Structuralism and Vulgar Materialism , 1974 .

[13]  F. Barth Ecologic Relationships of Ethnic Groups in Swat, North Pakistan , 1956 .

[14]  Conrad Phillip Kottak Culture and “Economic Development” , 1990 .

[15]  M. Freedman,et al.  Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference , 1970 .

[16]  J. Comaroff,et al.  Dialectical systems, history and anthropology: units of study and questions of theory , 1982 .

[17]  M. Douglas,et al.  Risk and culture : an essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers , 1983 .

[18]  C. Kottak,et al.  Ecological Awareness, Environmentalist Action, and International Conservation Strategy1 , 1993 .

[19]  J. Nash Ethnographic Aspects of the World Capitalist System , 1981 .