Priming of Abstract Logical Representations in 4-Year-Olds

Though preschoolers in certain experimental contexts strongly prefer to interpret ambiguous sentences containing quantified NPs and negation on the basis of surface syntax (e.g., Musolino's 1998 “observation of isomorphism”), contextual manipulations can lead to more adult-like behavior. But is isomorphism a purely pragmatic phenomenon, as recently proposed? In Experiment 1, we begin by isolating the contextual factor responsible for children's improvement in Musolino & Lidz (2006). We then demonstrate in Experiment 2 that this factor can be used to prime inverse scope interpretations. To remove pragmatics from the equation to the extent possible, we show in Experiment 3 that the same effect can be achieved via semantic priming. Our results represent the first clear evidence for priming of the abstract logico-syntactic structures underlying these interpretations and, thus, highlight the importance of language processing alongside pragmatic reasoning during children's linguistic development.

[1]  Ira A. Noveck,et al.  What Autism Can Reveal About Every ... not Sentences , 2007, J. Semant..

[2]  Chung-hye Han,et al.  V-Raising and Grammar Competition in Korean: Evidence from Negation and Quantifier Scope , 2007, Linguistic Inquiry.

[3]  Jacques Mehler,et al.  Role of surface and base structure in the perception of sentences , 1967 .

[4]  Christoph Scheepers,et al.  Syntactic priming of relative clause attachments: persistence of structural configuration in sentence production , 2003, Cognition.

[5]  Mark Steedman,et al.  On not being led up the garden path : The use of context by the psychological syntax processor , 1985 .

[6]  Andrew J. Stewart,et al.  Syntactic priming: Investigating the mental representation of language , 1995 .

[7]  D Miroslav Ciric,et al.  Parsing in Different Languages , 2005 .

[8]  Alexandra A. Cleland,et al.  Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue , 2000, Cognition.

[9]  Martin Kay,et al.  Syntactic Process , 1979, ACL.

[10]  Christopher Kennedy.  Antecedent-contained deletion and the syntax of quantification , 1997 .

[11]  Jeffrey Lidz,et al.  The Scope of Isomorphism: Turning Adults Into Children , 2003 .

[12]  M. Pickering,et al.  Is Syntax Separate or Shared Between Languages? , 2004, Psychological science.

[13]  Holly P Branigan,et al.  Priming prepositional-phrase attachment during comprehension. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  Jeffrey Lidz,et al.  Why children aren't universally successful with quantification , 2006 .

[15]  M. Corley,et al.  Syntactic priming in English sentence production: Categorical and latency evidence from an Internet-based study , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[16]  William O'Grady,et al.  Does Emergentism Have a Chance , 2008 .

[17]  J. K. Bock.  Syntactic persistence in language production , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  J. Musolino,et al.  Children's command of quantification , 2002, Cognition.

[19]  McMahon Jeffrey,et al.  Quantifier Raising in 4-year-olds , 2004 .

[20]  J. Huttenlocher,et al.  Syntactic priming in young children , 2004 .

[21]  P. Wason.  The contexts of plausible denial , 1965 .

[22]  Stephen Crain,et al.  Navigating negative quantificational space , 2000 .

[23]  Jill de Villiers,et al.  Some facts one simply cannot deny , 1975, Journal of Child Language.

[24]  Julien Musolino,et al.  Structure and Meaning in the Acquisition of Scope , 2006 .

[25]  Andrea Gualmini,et al.  The rise and fall of Isomorphism , 2008 .

[26]  Julien Musolino,et al.  On the Semantics of the Subset Principle , 2006 .

[27]  Thomas G. Bever,et al.  Judging the veracity of ambiguous sentences. , 1970 .

[28]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  The persistence of structural priming: transient activation or implicit learning? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[29]  A. Conroy,et al.  The Role of Verification Strategies: in Semantic Ambiguity Resolution in Children and Adults , 2009 .

[30]  Virginia Valian,et al.  Abstract sentence representations in 3-year-olds: Evidence from language production and comprehension , 2008 .

[31]  J. Trueswell,et al.  How to Prune a Garden Path by Nipping It in the Bud: Fast Priming of Verb Argument Structure , 1998 .

[32]  Andrea Gualmini,et al.  Some knowledge children don't lack , 2004 .

[33]  Alexandra A. Cleland,et al.  The use of lexical and syntactic information in language production: Evidence from the priming of noun-phrase structure , 2003 .

[34]  Norbert Hornstein,et al.  Logical Form: From Gb to Minimalism , 1995 .

[35]  Julien Musolino,et al.  Universal Grammar and the Acquisition of Semantic Knowledge: An Experimental Investigation into the Acquisition of Quantifier-Negation Interaction in English , 1999 .

[36]  Julien Musolino,et al.  On the Quantificational Status of Indefinites: The View From Child Language , 2006 .

[37]  Takuya Goro,et al.  Language -specific constraints on scope interpretation in first language acquisition , 2007 .

[38]  Mark Steedman,et al.  The use of context by the psychological parser , 1981 .

[39]  Janet D. Fodor,et al.  The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model , 1978, Cognition.

[40]  C. Clifton,et al.  The independence of syntactic processing , 1986 .

[41]  Holly Branigan,et al.  Syntactic Priming , 2007, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[42]  Rosalind Thornton,et al.  Investigations in universal grammar: A guide to experiments on the acquisition of syntax and semantics , 1998 .

[43]  Irina A. Sekerina,et al.  The kindergarten-path effect: studying on-line sentence processing in young children , 1999, Cognition.

[44]  John Whitman,et al.  --; CHARLES CLIFTON; and JANET RANDALL. 1983. Filling gaps: Decision principles and structure in sentence comprehension. Cognition 13.187-222. , and JANET FODOR. 1978. The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition , 1997 .

[45]  Children Want to Access Every Interpretation Adults Do: Children’s Knowledge of Ambiguity in ACD Constructions , 2004 .

[46]  Andrea Gualmini,et al.  The Role of Partitivity in Child Language , 2004 .

[47]  A. Gualmini,et al.  The Question–Answer Requirement for scope assignment , 2008 .

[48]  Laurence R. Horn.  A Natural History of Negation , 1989 .

[49]  Manuel Francisco Carreiras Valiña,et al.  Language processing in Spanish , 1996 .

[50]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[51]  Julie E. Boland,et al.  Interaction with autonomy: Multiple Output models and the inadequacy of the Great Divide , 1996, Cognition.

[52]  K. Bock,et al.  Framing sentences , 1990, Cognition.

[53]  Silvia P. Gennari,et al.  Acquisition of Negation and Quantification: Insights From Adult Production and Comprehension , 2006, Language acquisition.

[54]  Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al.  Is Syntax Separate or Shared Between Languages , 2004 .