Accuracy and Precision of Acetabular Component Position Does Not Differ Between the Anterior and Posterior Approaches to Total Hip Arthroplasty With Robotic Assistance: A Matched-Pair Analysis

[1]  H. Pang,et al.  Robotic-Arm Assisted Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty; Improving Implant Accuracy. , 2020, Surgical technology international.

[2]  M. Bautista,et al.  Use of Surgical Approach Is Not Associated With Instability After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis Comparing Direct Anterior and Posterolateral Approaches , 2020, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[3]  David R. Maldonado,et al.  Short-term Clinical Outcomes of Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Pair-Matched Controlled Study. , 2020, Orthopedics.

[4]  Christopher M. Belyea,et al.  Utility of Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Positioning of Total Hip Arthroplasty Components Using a Posterior and Direct Anterior Approach. , 2020, Military medicine.

[5]  H. Weinans,et al.  The Effect of Postural Pelvic Dynamics on the Three-dimensional Orientation of the Acetabular Cup in THA Is Patient Specific. , 2020, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  K. Moerenhout,et al.  Direct anterior versus posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: a multicentre, prospective, randomized clinical trial. , 2020, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[7]  S. Jerabek,et al.  Robots in the Operating Room During Hip and Knee Arthroplasty , 2020, Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine.

[8]  D. Delagrammaticas,et al.  Anterior versus posterior approach total hip arthroplasty: patient-reported and functional outcomes in the early postoperative period , 2019, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[9]  Pengcui Li,et al.  Robotics‐assisted versus conventional manual approaches for total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of comparative studies , 2019, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[10]  L. Sedel.  CORR Insights®: 2018 Frank Stinchfield Award: Spinopelvic Hypermobility Is Associated With an Inferior Outcome After THA: Examining the Effect of Spinal Arthrodesis. , 2018, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research.

[11]  P. Beaulé,et al.  2018 Frank Stinchfield Award: Spinopelvic Hypermobility Is Associated With an Inferior Outcome After THA Examining the Effect of Spinal Arthrodesis , 2018, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  Zhao Wang,et al.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of direct anterior approach versus posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty , 2018, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[13]  Jianping Xiong,et al.  Robotic-assisted compared with conventional total hip arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2018, Postgraduate Medical Journal.

[14]  O. Borens,et al.  Are there more wound complications or infections with direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty? , 2018, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[15]  Yayi Xia,et al.  Comparison of Early Functional Recovery After Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Direct Anterior or Posterolateral Approach: A Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[16]  F. Haddad,et al.  The direct anterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE , 2017, The bone & joint journal.

[17]  Darwin Chen,et al.  The Accuracy of Digital Templating for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Is There a Difference Between Direct Anterior and Posterior Approaches? , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[18]  J. Vigdorchik,et al.  Navigation and Robotics in Total Hip Arthroplasty. , 2017, JBJS reviews.

[19]  N. Taylor,et al.  A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial in Total Hip Arthroplasty-Comparing Early Results Between the Direct Anterior Approach and the Posterior Approach. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[20]  W. Moschetti,et al.  A Comparison of Radiographic Outcomes After Total Hip Arthroplasty Between the Posterior Approach and Direct Anterior Approach With Intraoperative Fluoroscopy. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[21]  D. Jacofsky,et al.  Robotics in Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Review. , 2016, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[22]  M. Archibeck,et al.  Acetabular Abduction and Dislocations in Direct Anterior vs Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective, Matched Cohort Study. , 2016, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[23]  A. Urquhart,et al.  No Difference in Dislocation Seen in Anterior Vs Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty. , 2016, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[24]  B. Domb,et al.  Accuracy of Component Placement in Robotic-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty. , 2016, Orthopedics.

[25]  B. Domb,et al.  Does Robotic-Assisted Computer Navigation Affect Acetabular Cup Positioning in Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Obese Patient? A Comparison Study. , 2015, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[26]  C. Jacobs,et al.  Comparison of Patient Function during the First Six Weeks after Direct Anterior or Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA): A Randomized Study. , 2015, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[27]  N. Sugano,et al.  The Accuracy of a Mechanical Cup Alignment Guide in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Through Direct Anterior and Posterior Approaches Measured with CT-Based Navigation. , 2015, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[28]  S. Odum,et al.  Direct anterior total hip arthroplasty yields more rapid voluntary cessation of all walking aids: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. , 2014, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[29]  A. Deshmukh,et al.  Does Fluoroscopy With Anterior Hip Arthoplasty Decrease Acetabular Cup Variability Compared With a Nonguided Posterior Approach? , 2014, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[30]  A. Ranawat,et al.  Does the Direct Anterior Approach in THA Offer Faster Rehabilitation and Comparable Safety to the Posterior Approach? , 2014, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[31]  I. Botser,et al.  Comparison of Robotic-assisted and Conventional Acetabular Cup Placement in THA: A Matched-pair Controlled Study , 2014, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[32]  W. P. Barrett,et al.  Prospective randomized study of direct anterior vs postero-lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty. , 2013, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[33]  D. Mayman,et al.  Leg-length inequalities following THA based on surgical technique. , 2013, Orthopedics.

[34]  R. Tuan,et al.  Comparison of minimally invasive direct anterior versus posterior total hip arthroplasty based on inflammation and muscle damage markers. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[35]  S. Bhatnagar,et al.  Cup anteversion in hip resurfacing: validation of EBRA and the presentation of a simple clinical grading system. , 2010, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[36]  Nobuhiko Sugano,et al.  A Comparison between Robotic-assisted and Manual Implantation of Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[37]  Karl-Heinz Widmer,et al.  A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[38]  R. Eastell,et al.  Precision of EBRA-Digital software for monitoring implant migration after total hip arthroplasty. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[39]  M. Krismer,et al.  Accuracy of EBRA-FCA in the measurement of migration of femoral components of total hip replacement. Einzel-Bild-Röntgen-Analyse-femoral component analysis. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[40]  B Jaramaz,et al.  Image Guided Navigation System to Measure Intraoperatively Acetabular Implant Alignment , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.