Cross-Layer Monitoring in Transparent Optical Networks

In transparent optical networks, signals propagate over all-optical lightpaths. The absence of regenerating devices that act in the electrical domain renders end-to-end monitoring difficult. Quality of transmission (QoT) metrics quantify the degradation in quality that a signal experiences as it traverses a lightpath. Hardware monitors that can directly measure QoT are expensive, which motivates the development of monitoring schemes that require fewer monitors but can still generate accurate QoT estimates. In this paper we describe a monitoring scheme that estimates the QoT of multiple lightpaths in a network. Our focus is on estimating bit-error-rates (BERs), but the methodology is also applicable for other metrics. One of the primary innovations in this monitoring framework is the establishment of “active lightpaths”-lightpaths that carry no useful data but are instead used as measurement probes. We describe a method for choosing where to establish the active lightpaths in order to maximize the information gain. We demonstrate with simulations the possibility to trade off the amount of costly hardware monitoring equipment with cheaper, temporary active lightpaths, while still achieving accurate monitoring.

[1]  M. Rabbat,et al.  Active monitoring of all-optical networks , 2008, 2008 10th Anniversary International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks.

[2]  Luca Valcarenghi,et al.  Lightpath establishment in distributed transparent dynamic optical networks using network kriging , 2009, 2009 35th European Conference on Optical Communication.

[3]  Joseph C. Palais,et al.  Fiber Optic Communications Systems , 2002 .

[4]  Tao Deng,et al.  Fair QoS-Aware Adaptive Routing and Wavelength Assignment in All-Optical Networks , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[5]  Mark Crovella,et al.  Network Kriging , 2005, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[6]  A.E. Willner,et al.  Optical performance monitoring , 2004, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[7]  Yin Zhang,et al.  NetQuest: A Flexible Framework for Large-Scale Network Measurement , 2009, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[8]  P. Castoldi,et al.  Enhancing GMPLS Signaling Protocol for Encompassing Quality of Transmission (QoT) in All-Optical Networks , 2008, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[9]  Randy H. Katz,et al.  Tomography-based overlay network monitoring , 2003, IMC '03.

[10]  Lian-Kuan Chen,et al.  Monitoring of Linearly Accumulated Optical Impairments in All-Optical Networks , 2009, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[11]  D.C. Kilper,et al.  Impact of topology and traffic on physical layer monitoring in transparent networks , 2009, 2009 Conference on Optical Fiber Communication - incudes post deadline papers.

[12]  Michael G. Rabbat,et al.  Compressed network monitoring for ip and all-optical networks , 2007, IMC '07.

[13]  Ozan K. Tonguz,et al.  Failure location algorithm for transparent optical networks , 2005, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[14]  Yin Zhang,et al.  NetQuest: a flexible framework for large-scale network measurement , 2009, TNET.

[15]  D.J. Tebben,et al.  Performance monitoring of optical networks with synchronous and asynchronous sampling , 2001, OFC 2001. Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exhibit. Technical Digest Postconference Edition (IEEE Cat. 01CH37171).