Behavioral implications of absorptive capacity: The role of technological effort and technological capability in leveraging alliance network technological resources

Abstract This paper focuses on the moderating role of a firm's absorptive capacity in realizing innovation benefits from the firm's alliance network technological resources. We conceptualize absorptive capacity along two dimensions—technological effort and technological capability—and hypothesize that these two dimensions have opposing moderating effects which can result in theoretical and empirical misspecifications if ignored. We argue that firms with higher technological efforts have greater motivation to search for knowledge from their alliance partners, place more value on the external knowledge and mobilize such knowledge, and face lower internal resistance to assimilate and to use the knowledge. On the other hand, firms with stronger technological capability have lower motivation to search for knowledge from alliance partners, put lower value on the knowledge, make less intense efforts to mobilize it, and face greater internal resistance in assimilating and using the knowledge. By analyzing longitudinal data of 178 U.S.-based public semiconductor firms during 1988–2000 using negative binomial regression, we find that as firms increase their technological effort, the benefits from alliance network resources in terms of technological innovations come at a higher rate. In contrast, as technological capabilities of firms increase, the benefits from the alliance network resources in the form firm technological innovations come at a lower rate. We further discuss important theoretical and managerial implications of our findings.

[1]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Alliance Formation , 2006 .

[2]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[3]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation , 2000 .

[4]  Corey C. Phelps,et al.  Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[5]  Sui-Hua Yu,et al.  Social capital, absorptive capability, and firm innovation , 2013 .

[6]  M. Nieto,et al.  Absorptive capacity, technological opportunity, knowledge spillovers, and innovative effort , 2005 .

[7]  Jiann-Chyuan Wang,et al.  External technology acquisition and firm performance: A longitudinal study , 2008 .

[8]  Michael D. Santoro,et al.  Alliance Portfolios and Patent Output: The Case of Biotechnology Alliances , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[9]  Nicholas Argyres CAPABILITIES, TECHNOLOGICAL DIVERSIFICATION AND DIVISIONALIZATION , 1996 .

[10]  R. Katila New Product Search Over Time: Past Ideas in Their Prime? , 2002 .

[11]  Nenad Stankovic,et al.  Performance: a Longitudinal Study , 2008, SEKE.

[12]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[13]  Jaeyong Song,et al.  Creating new technology through alliances: An empirical investigation of joint patents , 2007 .

[14]  Atul Nerkar,et al.  Evolution of R&D Capabilities: The Role of Knowledge Networks Within a Firm , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[15]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[16]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  Networks, Knowledge, and Niches: Competition in the Worldwide Semiconductor Industry, 1984-1991 , 1996, American Journal of Sociology.

[17]  G. Ahuja The duality of collaboration : Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages , 2000 .

[18]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Cross-border R&D alliances, absorptive capacity and technology learning , 2005 .

[19]  D. Mowery,et al.  Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: implications for the resource-based view of the firm , 1998 .

[20]  Victor I. Chang,et al.  How Blockchain can impact financial services – The overview, challenges and recommendations from expert interviewees , 2020, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[21]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct , 2006 .

[22]  William Gould,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation with stata , 1999 .

[23]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions , 2001 .

[24]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[25]  Melissa A. Schilling Understanding the Alliance Data , 2008 .

[26]  Patricia M. Norman Protecting knowledge in strategic alliances: Resource and relational characteristics , 2002 .

[27]  Yannis Caloghirou,et al.  Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance? , 2004 .

[28]  Devi R. Gnyawali,et al.  Impact of Co-Opetition on Firm Competitive Behavior: An Empirical Examination , 2006 .

[29]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity , 2007 .

[30]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[31]  Andrew C. Inkpen Learning Through Joint Ventures: A Framework Of Knowledge Acquisition , 2000 .

[32]  Jaeyong Song,et al.  The paradox of technological capabilities: a study of knowledge sourcing from host countries of overseas R&D operations , 2008 .

[33]  Pravin K. Trivedi,et al.  Regression Analysis of Count Data , 1998 .

[34]  W. Rostow The Take-off into Self-sustained Growth , 1956 .

[35]  Devi R. Gnyawali,et al.  When Do Relational Resources Matter? Leveraging Portfolio Technological Resources for Breakthrough Innovation , 2011 .

[36]  S. Zahra,et al.  The effects of alliance portfolio characteristics and absorptive capacity on performance A study of biotechnology firms , 2001 .

[37]  Geert Duysters,et al.  Learning mechanisms and differential performance in alliance portfolios , 2007 .

[38]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  The Use of Knowledge for Technological Innovation Within Diversified Firms , 2007 .

[39]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[40]  A. Arora,et al.  Evaluating technological information and utilizing it: Scientific knowledge, technological capability, and external linkages in biotechnology , 1994 .

[41]  W. W. Muir,et al.  Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity , 1980 .

[42]  G. Ahuja Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[43]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .

[44]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[45]  G. Duysters,et al.  The Role of Alliance Network Redundancy in the Creation of Core and Non-Core Technologies , 2009 .

[46]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[47]  G. Hamel Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances , 1991 .

[48]  Byung-Jin Park The Effects of Coopetition and Coopetition Capability on Firm Innovation Performance , 2011 .

[49]  Michiel Pieters,et al.  Mind the gap: Balancing alliance network and technology portfolios during periods of technological uncertainty , 2010 .

[50]  Boris Durisin,et al.  Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization , 2007 .

[51]  J. Oxley Appropriability Hazards and Governance in Strategic Alliances: A Transaction Cost Approach , 1997 .