Breast lesion classification based on supersonic shear-wave elastography and automated lesion segmentation from B-mode ultrasound images

Supersonic shear-wave elastography (SWE) has emerged as a useful imaging modality for breast lesion assessment. Regions of interest (ROIs) were required to be specified for extracting features that characterize malignancy of lesions. Although analyses have been performed in small rectangular ROIs identified manually by expert observers, the results were subject to observer variability and the analysis of small ROIs would potentially miss out important features available in other parts of the lesion. Recent investigations extracted features from the entire lesion segmented by B-mode ultrasound images either manually or semi-automatically, but lesion delineation using existing techniques is time-consuming and prone to variability as intensive user interactions are required. In addition, rich diagnostic features were available along the rim surrounding the lesion. The width of the rim analyzed was subjectively and empirically determined by expert observers in previous studies after intensive visual study on the images, which is time-consuming and susceptible to observer variability. This paper describes an analysis pipeline to segment and classify lesions efficiently. The lesion boundary was first initialized and then deformed based on energy fields generated by the dyadic wavelet transform. Features of the SWE images were extracted from inside and outside of a lesion for different widths of the surrounding rim. Then, feature selection was performed followed by the Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification. This strategy obviates the empirical and time-consuming selection of the surrounding rim width before the analysis. The pipeline was evaluated on 137 lesions. Feature selection was performed 20 times using different sets of 14 lesions (7 malignant, 7 benign). Leave-one-out SVM classification was performed in each of the 20 experiments with a mean sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 95.1%, 94.6% and 94.8% respectively. The pipeline took an average of 20 s to process a lesion. The fact that this efficient pipeline generated classification accuracy superior to that of existing algorithms suggests that improved efficiency did not compromise classification accuracy. The ability to streamline the quantitative assessment of SWE images will potentially accelerate the adoption of the combined use of ultrasound and elastography in clinical practice.

[1]  Hairong Zheng,et al.  Computer-assisted assessment of ultrasound real-time elastography: initial experience in 145 breast lesions. , 2014, European journal of radiology.

[2]  A. Stavros,et al.  Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. , 1995, Radiology.

[3]  Benjamin Castaneda,et al.  US elastography of breast and prostate lesions. , 2009, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[4]  J. Youk,et al.  Visually assessed colour overlay features in shear-wave elastography for breast masses: quantification and diagnostic performance , 2013, European Radiology.

[5]  M. Giger,et al.  Computerized lesion detection on breast ultrasound. , 2002, Medical physics.

[6]  Fernando Arámbula Cosío,et al.  Automatic initialization of an active shape model of the prostate , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[7]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  A Practical Guide to Support Vector Classication , 2008 .

[8]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Comparison of shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  Shigao Chen,et al.  Shearwave dispersion ultrasound vibrometry (SDUV) for measuring tissue elasticity and viscosity , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[10]  M. Mathieu,et al.  Breast elasticity: principles, technique, results: an update and overview of commercially available software. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[11]  Heng-Da Cheng,et al.  A novel automatic seed point selection algorithm for breast ultrasound images , 2008, 2008 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[12]  Yuxuan Wang,et al.  Completely automated segmentation approach for breast ultrasound images using multiple-domain features. , 2012, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[13]  M. Tozaki,et al.  Pattern classification of ShearWaveTM Elastography images for differential diagnosis between benign and malignant solid breast masses , 2011, Acta radiologica.

[14]  Eun Ju Son,et al.  Diagnostic value of commercially available shear-wave elastography for breast cancers: integration into BI-RADS classification with subcategories of category 4 , 2013, European Radiology.

[15]  Yimin Chen,et al.  Fully automatic prostate segmentation from transrectal ultrasound images based on radial bas-relief initialization and slice-based propagation , 2016, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[16]  Moi Hoon Yap,et al.  A novel algorithm for initial lesion detection in ultrasound breast images , 2008, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[17]  W. Svensson,et al.  Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. , 2012, Radiology.

[18]  Tommy W. S. Chow,et al.  Estimating optimal feature subsets using efficient estimation of high-dimensional mutual information , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[19]  A. Fenster,et al.  Three-dimensional carotid ultrasound segmentation variability dependence on signal difference and boundary orientation. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[20]  Eun Ju Son,et al.  Clinical application of qualitative assessment for breast masses in shear-wave elastography. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[21]  A. Thompson,et al.  Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses: value of shear wave elastography according to lesion stiffness combined with greyscale ultrasound according to BI-RADS classification , 2012, British Journal of Cancer.

[22]  M. Fink,et al.  Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging--preliminary results. , 2010, Radiology.

[23]  J. Sethian,et al.  A Fast Level Set Method for Propagating Interfaces , 1995 .

[24]  H. Chenga,et al.  Automated breast cancer detection and classification using ultrasound images A survey , 2009 .

[25]  Eranga Ukwatta,et al.  Sensitive three‐dimensional ultrasound assessment of carotid atherosclerosis by weighted average of local vessel wall and plaque thickness change , 2017, Medical physics.

[26]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[27]  H. C. Lim,et al.  Computerised prostate boundary estimation of ultrasound images using radial bas-relief method , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[28]  J. H. Yoon,et al.  Qualitative pattern classification of shear wave elastography for breast masses: how it correlates to quantitative measurements. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[29]  Min Bai,et al.  Virtual Touch Tissue Quantification Using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Technology , 2012, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[30]  Jung Hyun Yoon,et al.  Diagnostic performances of shear wave elastography: which parameter to use in differential diagnosis of solid breast masses? , 2013, European Radiology.

[31]  D. Noh,et al.  Clinical application of shear wave elastography (SWE) in the diagnosis of benign and malignant breast diseases , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[32]  Ioan Sporea,et al.  EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical , 2017 .

[33]  Hairong Zheng,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis based on quantitative elastographic features with supersonic shear wave imaging. , 2014, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[34]  Kim Thomson,et al.  Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses , 2010, Breast Cancer Research.

[35]  David O. Cosgrove,et al.  Shear wave elastography for breast masses is highly reproducible , 2011, European Radiology.

[36]  M. Fink,et al.  Supersonic shear imaging: a new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[37]  T. Matsumura,et al.  Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. , 2006, Radiology.

[38]  Jagat Narain Kapur,et al.  Measures of information and their applications , 1994 .

[39]  Richard G Barr,et al.  Shear Wave Imaging of the Breast , 2012, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[40]  Robert Rohling,et al.  Automatic registration of 3-D ultrasound images , 1998, Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271).

[41]  A. Thompson,et al.  Invasive breast cancer: relationship between shear-wave elastographic findings and histologic prognostic factors. , 2012, Radiology.

[42]  J Bercoff,et al.  In vivo breast tumor detection using transient elastography. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[43]  Differentiation of benign from malignant nonpalpable breast masses: A comparison of computer-assisted quantification and visual assessment of lesion stiffness with the use of sonographic elastography , 2010, Acta radiologica.

[44]  Jianhua Huang,et al.  An improved quantitative measurement for thyroid cancer detection based on elastography. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[45]  Dagmar Leucht,et al.  Teaching Atlas of Breast Ultrasound , 1992 .

[46]  Eran A. Edirisinghe,et al.  Object Boundary Detection in Ultrasound Images , 2006, The 3rd Canadian Conference on Computer and Robot Vision (CRV'06).

[47]  Bing Li,et al.  Novel 3D ultrasound image-based biomarkers based on a feature selection from a 2D standardized vessel wall thickness map: a tool for sensitive assessment of therapies for carotid atherosclerosis , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[48]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Differentiation of benign from malignant solid breast masses: comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional shear-wave elastography , 2012, European Radiology.

[49]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[50]  Jie Tang,et al.  Study of quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging in the diagnosis of breast tumours , 2012, La radiologia medica.

[51]  Eun Ju Son,et al.  Three-dimensional shear-wave elastography for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions: comparison with two-dimensional shear-wave elastography , 2013, European Radiology.

[52]  Vicent Caselles,et al.  Texture-Oriented Anisotropic Filtering and Geodesic Active Contours in Breast Tumor Ultrasound Segmentation , 2007, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[53]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Deep learning based classification of breast tumors with shear-wave elastography. , 2016, Ultrasonics.

[54]  Tony F. Chan,et al.  Active contours without edges , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[55]  Congzhi Wang,et al.  Quantification of elastic heterogeneity using contourlet-based texture analysis in shear-wave elastography for breast tumor classification. , 2015, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[56]  B. Garra,et al.  Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results. , 1997, Radiology.

[57]  Tsuyoshi Shiina,et al.  WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: Part 1: basic principles and terminology. , 2015, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.