Modeling and simulation of residents’ response in nuclear disaster

It is important to model and predict residents’ behaviors in an emergency in order to establish good evacuation schemes during disasters. This research presents modeling and simulation of residents’ behaviors in a nuclear disaster focusing on residents’ decision-making processes: information acquisition, situation assessment, and selecting actions. We selected qualitative causal relations between residents’ behaviors and the attributes of information, human, and situations from 57 reviews of the past 12 disaster cases. We then constructed a conceptual model of residents’ behaviors in a conventional stimulus–organism–response (S–O–R) model of human information processing. We adopted probabilistic reasoning (Bayesian belief network) to simulate the situation assessment of a resident in a nuclear disaster. We carried out a simulation using the announcement log of the JCO criticality accident and confirmed that the model could simulate the tendencies in residents’ behaviors observed in the actual disaster and can reflect various features of the conceptual model.

[1]  Edwin R. Galea,et al.  Simulation of ship evacuation and passenger circulation , 2004 .

[2]  S Mikami,et al.  Human Responses to Disasters , 1985 .

[3]  M. Lindell,et al.  Understanding Citizen Response to Disasters with Implications for Terrorism , 2003 .

[4]  Yohei Murakami,et al.  Multi-agent simulation for crisis management , 2002, Proceedings. IEEE Workshop on Knowledge Media Networking.

[5]  Kazuo Furuta,et al.  Human Factor Analysis of JCO Criticality Accident , 2000, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[6]  Ronald W. Perry,et al.  Evacuation Decision-Making in Natural Disasters , 1979 .

[7]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems - networks of plausible inference , 1991, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.

[8]  A. Welford Single-channel operation in the brain. , 1967, Acta psychologica.

[9]  C. McLean,et al.  A framework for modeling and simulation for emergency response , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference, 2003..

[10]  M. Lindell,et al.  Preparedness for emergency response: guidelines for the emergency planning process. , 2003, Disasters.

[11]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Multiple resources and performance prediction , 2002 .

[12]  Martin H. Levinson Linked: The New Science of Networks , 2004 .

[13]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age , 2003 .

[14]  R. Woodworth Dynamics of behavior , 1958 .

[15]  Fumio Yamazaki,et al.  APPLICATION OF VIRTUAL REALTY TO HUMAN EVACUATION BEHAVIOR , 1997 .

[16]  Shigeyuki Okazaki,et al.  A study of simulation model for pedestrian movement with evacuation and queuing , 1993 .

[17]  H. Pashler,et al.  Attention capacity and task difficulty in visual search , 2005, Cognition.