Facial Nerve Grading Systems (1985–2002): Beyond the House-Brackmann Scale

Objective To assess methods of evaluating the function of the facial nerve that have been introduced over the past 15 years, particularly in comparison with the House-Brackmann scale. Data Sources A Medline search was undertaken of the English-language medical literature between 1983 and 2000 to identify proposed methods of evaluating facial nerve function. Study Selection Although all grading systems were considered, attention was focused on the systems that provided improvements in either precision or ease of use. Conclusions Because of the limitations and subjectivity of the House-Brackmann scale, several new scales of various degrees of objectivity and ease of use have been introduced. The Nottingham system offers a more objective but easy-to-use facial nerve grading system that has been demonstrated to be valid and that would be easy for the average practitioner to adopt. The authors propose a more systematic evaluation of this system to determine whether its widespread application is appropriate.

[1]  S. Stoeckli,et al.  Objective Evaluation of Normal Facial Function , 1999, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[2]  J. Nedzelski,et al.  Development of a sensitive clinical facial grading system. , 1996, European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery.

[3]  S. Burres,et al.  Facial biomechanics: The standards of normal , 1985, The Laryngoscope.

[4]  O. Sparrow,et al.  Repair of facial nerve after removal of cerebellopontine angle tumors: a comparative study. , 1993, Journal of neurosurgery.

[5]  J Byers,et al.  Computerized quantitative dynamic analysis of facial motion in the paralyzed and synkinetic face. , 1992, The American journal of otology.

[6]  D. Baguley,et al.  Nervus intermedius function after vestibular schwannoma removal: Clinical features and pathophysiological mechanisms , 1995, The Laryngoscope.

[7]  J. W. House,et al.  Facial nerve grading systems. , 1983, The Laryngoscope.

[8]  K. Adour,et al.  An analysis of the Adour-Swanson and House-Brackmann grading systems for facial nerve recovery , 2004, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[9]  J. Neely,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of the Variation Within Grades of Facial Paralysis , 1996, The Laryngoscope.

[10]  E. Sargent,et al.  Measurement of facial movement with computer software. , 1998, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[11]  I Inokuchi,et al.  Evaluation of Facial Palsy by Moiré Topography Index , 1997, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[12]  U. Fisch,et al.  Objective scaling of facial nerve function based on area analysis (OSCAR). , 1998, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[13]  P J Kelly,et al.  The Nottingham System: Objective Assessment of Facial Nerve Function in the Clinic , 1994, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[14]  U. Fisch,et al.  The comparison of facial grading systems. , 1986, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[15]  G. Croxson,et al.  Grading facial nerve function: House-Brackmann versus Burres-Fisch methods. , 1990, The American journal of otology.

[16]  D. Brackmann,et al.  Assessing Recovery of Facial Function following Acoustic Neuroma Surgery , 1984, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[17]  U. Fisch,et al.  Comparative Value of Facial Nerve Grading Systems , 1997, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.