Enzyme kinetics: the whole picture reveals hidden meanings

The methodology adopted by Michaelis and Menten in 1913 is still routinely used to characterize the catalytic power and selectivity of enzymes. These kinetic measurements must be performed soon after the purified enzyme is mixed with a large excess of substrate. Other time scales and solution compositions are no less physiologically relevant, but fall outside the range of applicability of the classical formalism. Here we show that the complete picture of an enzyme's mode of function is critically obscured by the limited scope of conventional kinetic analysis, even in the simplest case of a single active site without inhibition. This picture is now unveiled in a mathematically closed form that remains valid over the reaction time for all combinations of enzyme/substrate concentrations and rate constants. Algebraic simplicity is maintained in the new formalism when stationary reaction phases are considered. By achieving this century‐old objective, the otherwise hidden role of the reversible binding step is revealed and atypical kinetic profiles are explained. Most singular kinetic behaviors are identified in a critical region of conditions that coincide with typical cell conditions. Because it is not covered by the Michaelis–Menten model, the critical region has been missed until now by low‐ and high‐throughput screenings of new drugs. New possibilities are therefore raised for novel and once‐promising inhibitors to therapeutically target enzymes.

[1]  Joerg M. Buescher,et al.  Tradeoff between enzyme and metabolite efficiency maintains metabolic homeostasis upon perturbations in enzyme capacity , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[2]  A. Cornish-Bowden The origins of enzyme kinetics , 2013, FEBS letters.

[3]  X. Xie Enzyme Kinetics, Past and Present , 2013, Science.

[4]  Elazer R Edelman,et al.  Quasi-steady-state kinetics at enzyme and substrate concentrations in excess of the Michaelis-Menten constant. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[5]  R. Goody,et al.  The original Michaelis constant: translation of the 1913 Michaelis-Menten paper. , 2011, Biochemistry.

[6]  Antoine M. van Oijen,et al.  Ever-fluctuating single enzyme molecules: Michaelis-Menten equation revisited , 2006, Nature chemical biology.

[7]  Stefan Schuster,et al.  Commemorating the 1913 Michaelis–Menten paper Die Kinetik der Invertinwirkung: three perspectives , 2014, The FEBS journal.

[8]  J. Angulo,et al.  Fragment-based Screening of the Donor Substrate Specificity of Human Blood Group B Galactosyltransferase Using Saturation Transfer Difference NMR* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[9]  J. Rabinowitz,et al.  Absolute Metabolite Concentrations and Implied Enzyme Active Site Occupancy in Escherichia coli , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[10]  L. Wienkers,et al.  Predicting in vivo drug interactions from in vitro drug discovery data , 2005, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[11]  Shlomi Reuveni,et al.  Role of substrate unbinding in Michaelis–Menten enzymatic reactions , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  J B Houston,et al.  In vitro-in vivo scaling of CYP kinetic data not consistent with the classical Michaelis-Menten model. , 2000, Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals.

[13]  G. Briggs,et al.  A Note on the Kinetics of Enzyme Action. , 1925, The Biochemical journal.

[14]  R. Duggleby,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the time courses of enzyme-catalyzed reactions. , 2001, Methods.

[15]  E. Davidson,et al.  The Dual Arrhenius and Michaelis–Menten kinetics model for decomposition of soil organic matter at hourly to seasonal time scales , 2012 .

[16]  Michael C Fitzgerald,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of protein folding and stability using a tryptophan modification protocol. , 2014, Analytical chemistry.

[17]  I. Kariv,et al.  Discovery of PDK1 Kinase Inhibitors with a Novel Mechanism of Action by Ultrahigh Throughput Screening , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[18]  Jeremy Gunawardena,et al.  Some lessons about models from Michaelis and Menten , 2012, Molecular biology of the cell.

[19]  Jeremy Gunawardena,et al.  Time‐scale separation – Michaelis and Menten's old idea, still bearing fruit , 2014, The FEBS journal.

[20]  Zeljko Bajzer,et al.  About and beyond the Henri-Michaelis-Menten rate equation for single-substrate enzyme kinetics. , 2012, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[21]  Peter J. Halling,et al.  Standards for Reporting Enzyme Data: The STRENDA Consortium: What it aims to do and why it should be helpful , 2014 .

[22]  L. Segel,et al.  On the validity of the steady state assumption of enzyme kinetics. , 1988, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[23]  F. Rocha,et al.  A Generic Crystallization-like Model That Describes the Kinetics of Amyloid Fibril Formation*♦ , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  W. Cao,et al.  Quantitative full time course analysis of nonlinear enzyme cycling kinetics , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[25]  P. Maini,et al.  Enzyme kinetics at high enzyme concentration , 2000, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[26]  Robert A Copeland,et al.  Evaluation of enzyme inhibitors in drug discovery. A guide for medicinal chemists and pharmacologists. , 2005, Methods of biochemical analysis.

[27]  A. Fersht,et al.  Demonstration of two reaction pathways for the aminoacylation of tRNA. Application of the pulsed quenched flow technique. , 1975, Biochemistry.

[28]  J. Millán,et al.  High-throughput screening of tissue-nonspecific alkaline phosphatase for identification of effectors with diverse modes of action , 2010, Nature Protocols.

[29]  William W. Chen,et al.  Classic and contemporary approaches to modeling biochemical reactions. , 2010, Genes & development.

[30]  Sonya M. Hanson,et al.  Reactant stationary approximation in enzyme kinetics. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[31]  E. Seibert,et al.  Fundamentals of enzyme kinetics. , 2014, Methods in molecular biology.