Unveiling videos: Consumer‐generated ads as qualitative inquiry

Companies spend millions of dollars researching consumers, consumer attitudes to brands, and consumer uses of products. Yet the irony is that consumers are now doing this research themselves and posting their material to video-sharing sites such as YouTube. In this paper we argue that the BASIC IDS framework (Cohen, 1999) for dimensional qualitative research can be used to deconstruct consumer-generated videos to yield valuable insights into the paradoxes of consumer–service interactions. One category of service that has gained huge media attention of late, and yet is poorly understood, is the phenomenon of online social networks. Using three consumer-generated ads about the social networking site Facebook, we explore the paradoxes of consumer–service interaction, namely consumers' ambivalent attitudes to the service, how the consumer uses and is used by the service, how the service both facilitates behavior and changes behavior, and how the service mediates social interactions yet drives social actors. Finally, we locate the findings in terms of the wider context of Gen Y and the digital revolution, specify limitations, and cite implications and avenues for future research. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship , 2007, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[2]  B. Wolfe Toward a unified conceptual framework of psychotherapy. , 2008 .

[3]  K. Wilber,et al.  Unification beyond eclecticism and integration: Integral psychotherapy. , 2008 .

[4]  Laura E. Buffardi,et al.  Narcissism and Social Networking Web Sites , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[5]  P. Berthon,et al.  Ad Lib: When Customers Create the Ad , 2008 .

[6]  Martin J. Downing,et al.  Why Video? How Technology Advances Method , 2008 .

[7]  David Ingram “My Dirty Stream”: Pete Seeger, American Folk Music, and Environmental Protest , 2008 .

[8]  Hope Schau,et al.  Vigilante Marketing and Consumer-Created Communications , 2007 .

[9]  J. Deighton,et al.  Digital Interactivity: Unanticipated Consequences for Markets, Marketing, and Consumers , 2007 .

[10]  Haseeb Shabbir,et al.  Determining the antecedents and consequences of donor‐perceived relationship quality—A dimensional qualitative research approach , 2007 .

[11]  S. Kates,et al.  When Customers Get Clever: Managerial Approaches to Dealing with Creative Consumers , 2007, Strategic Direction.

[12]  Leyland Pitt,et al.  Consuming Technology: Why Marketers Sometimes Get it Wrong , 2005 .

[13]  J. Allen,et al.  The two faces of adolescents' success with peers: adolescent popularity, social adaptation, and deviant behavior. , 2005, Child development.

[14]  S. Lea,et al.  Through the looking glass: considering the challenges visual methodologies raise for qualitative research , 2005 .

[15]  Performance, Self-Representation and Narrative: Interviewing with Video , 2004 .

[16]  G. Hopkinson,et al.  "What happened was..." Broadening the Agenda for Storied Research , 2001 .

[17]  M. Mazzotta Alunos e escolas com necessidades especiais no século XXI , 2001 .

[18]  R. Cohen What qualitative research can be , 1999 .

[19]  A. Portes Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology , 1998 .

[20]  J. Thompson,et al.  Critical Hermeneutics: Contents , 1981 .

[21]  J. Thompson,et al.  Critical Hermeneutics: Thematic exposition , 1981 .