A methodology for static stiffness mapping in lower mobility parallel manipulators with decoupled motions

In this paper a general methodology for obtaining static stiffness maps in lower mobility parallel manipulators is proposed. The main objective is to define a set of guidelines, which allow the experimental work to be optimized and computational time to be reduced. First, a two-degree-of-freedom (DOF) mechanism will be used for methodology validation, since it is the stiffness of the basic kinematic chain of the manipulator that is to be analysed. Two mathematical models of this mechanism and an experimental prototype will be considered for the validation. After that, the methodology will be applied to a lower mobility (4-DOF) parallel manipulator. In this paper, the experimental prototype and its set-up is highly important because some particular features of the experimental analysis will be defined. This paper introduces a key experimental tool: the preload, which allows the clearances and possible assembling errors to be considered. The added value from the application of this procedure is the obtaining of graphs that describe, in an intuitive and useful way, the behaviour of the manipulator's stiffness inside its workspace as a function of the mobile platform position and orientation.

[1]  J Wu,et al.  Dexterity and stiffness analysis of a three-degree-of-freedom planar parallel manipulator with actuation redundancy , 2007 .

[2]  Qingsong Xu,et al.  Stiffness analysis for a 3-PUU parallel kinematic machine , 2008 .

[3]  Tian Huang,et al.  Stiffness estimation of a tripod-based parallel kinematic machine , 2002, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[4]  François Pierrot,et al.  A Method for Modeling Analytical Stiffness of a Lower Mobility Parallel Manipulator , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[5]  Liping Wang,et al.  Stiffness analysis of a Stewart platform-based parallel kinematic machine , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[6]  Dominique Deblaise,et al.  A systematic analytical method for PKM stiffness matrix calculation , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[7]  Qingsong Xu,et al.  Kinematics and Stiffness Analysis for a General 3-PRS Spatial Parallel Mechanism , 2004 .

[8]  Alberto Rovetta,et al.  Analysis of typical locomotion of a symmetric hexapod robot , 2009, Robotica.

[9]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  Stiffness mapping for parallel manipulators , 1990, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[10]  Haitao Liu,et al.  Stiffness Modeling of the Tricept Robot Using the Overall Jacobian Matrix , 2009 .

[11]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  Theory of elasticity , 1975 .

[12]  Charles Pinto,et al.  Workspaces associated to assembly modes of the 5R planar parallel manipulator , 2008, Robotica.

[13]  J. Fauroux,et al.  Evaluation of a 4-Degree of Freedom Parallel Manipulator Stiffness , 2003 .

[14]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  Parametric Stiffness Analysis of the Orthoglide , 2004, ArXiv.

[15]  P. Ray Design of New High Speed Machining Machines , 2004 .

[16]  Placid Mathew Ferreira,et al.  Computation of stiffness and stiffness bounds for parallel link manipulators 1 This research was sup , 1999 .

[17]  Dan Zhang,et al.  Analysis of parallel kinematic machine with kinetostatic modelling method , 2004 .

[18]  Zhenqi Zhu,et al.  Errors and Corrections of Robotics Standard ANSI/RIA R15.05-1-1990: Industrial Robots and Robot Systems Point to Point and Static Performance Characteristics—Evaluation , 2002 .