Seeing a Patient's Eyes: System Trust in Telemedicine

This paper reports on system trust and interpersonal trust issues revealed in an embedded-case study of two telemedicine services offered by a teaching hospital. Consistent with McKnight (2005) perceived system competence was an important dimension of system trustworthiness. Drawing on representation theory (Wand and Weber, 1995) we observed: 1. Some clinicians feel telemedicine provides a better representation than they can achieve in conventional practice. 2) The ability to control specific technical features leads to increased representational quality, perceived system trustworthiness and usage. 3) Some clinicians adapt the telemedicine system to improve it. 4) Some users do not distinguish between the technology artifact and a human helper when judging system trustworthiness. We conclude with two key findings: 1) judgments about system trustworthiness interact with users’ technical and clinical skills and 2) system trust and interpersonal trust are reciprocal.

[1]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Interpersonal Traits, Complementarity, and Trust in Virtual Collaboration , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[3]  Ron Weber,et al.  Editor's comment: still desperately seeking the IT artifact , 2003 .

[4]  Nicholas Berente,et al.  Embedding New IT Artifacts into Design Practice for Knowledge Creation , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[5]  Gary E. Bolton,et al.  Does Competition Promote Trust and Trustworthiness in Online Trading? An Experimental Study , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Varun Grover,et al.  The Role of System Trust in Business-to-Consumer Transactions , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Matteo Curcuruto,et al.  Trust in information system technology. A contribution to Italian validation of a model , 2009 .

[8]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Influence Processes for Information Technology Acceptance: An Elaboration Likelihood Model , 2006, MIS Q..

[9]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Examining Trust in Information Technology Artifacts: The Effects of System Quality and Culture , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  W. Orlikowski.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[11]  Daniel Z. Levin,et al.  The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[12]  Anne Beaudry,et al.  Understanding User Responses to Information Technology: A Coping Model of User Adaption , 2005, MIS Q..

[13]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999 .

[14]  Andrew Burton-Jones,et al.  Using Information Systems Effectively: A Representational Perspective , 2008 .

[15]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effectsof Interorganizational and Interpersonaltrust on Performance , 1998 .

[16]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Understanding Customer Trust in Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce, Web-Mediated Electronic Commerce, and Traditional Commerce , 2004, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[17]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Trust In and Adoption of Online Recommendation Agents , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[18]  B. Delahaye,et al.  Influences On Knowledge processes In Organizational Learning: The Psychosocial Filter , 2000 .

[19]  David L. Paul,et al.  A Field of Study of the Effect of Interpersonal Trust on Virtual Collaborative Relationship Performance , 2004, MIS Q..

[20]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  Toward Contextualized Theories of Trust: The Role of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[22]  Charles J. Kacmar,et al.  Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  Norah E. Dunbar,et al.  Testing the Interactivity Model: Communication Processes, Partner Assessments, and the Quality of Collaborative Work , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Swift trust and temporary groups. , 1996 .

[25]  Rob Kling,et al.  Reconceptualizing Users as Social Actors in Information Systems Research , 2003, MIS Q..

[26]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  Does Information Technology Training Really Matter? A Social Information Processing Analysis of Coworkers' Influence on IT Usage in the Workplace , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Ron Weber,et al.  On the deep structure of information systems , 1995, Inf. Syst. J..

[28]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Reliability, Mindfulness, and Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[29]  R. Stake.  The art of case study research , 1995 .

[30]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .